Literature DB >> 19606026

The critical care cascade: a systems approach.

Rishi Ghosh1, Paul Pepe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To emphasize the evolving body of evidence that supports the need for a more seamless and interconnected continuum of patient care for a growing compendium of critical care conditions, starting in the prehospital and emergency department (ED) phases of management and continuing through ICU and rehabilitation services. RECENT
FINDINGS: The care of critically ill and injured patients has become increasingly complex. It now has been demonstrated that, for a number of such critical care conditions, optimal management not only relies heavily on the talents of highly coordinated, multidisciplinary teams, but it also may require shared responsibilities across a continuum of longitudinal care involving numerous specialties and departments. This continuum usually needs to begin in the prehospital and ED settings with management extending through specialized in-hospital diagnostic and interventional suites to traditional ICU and rehabilitation programs. In recent years, examples of these conditions have included the development of systems of care for trauma, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis syndromes, toxicology and other critical illnesses. Although the widespread implementation of such multidisciplinary, multispecialty critical care cascades of care has been achieved most commonly in trauma care, current healthcare delivery systems generally tend to employ compartmentalized organization for the majority of other critical care patients. Accordingly, optimal systematic care often breaks down in the management of these complex patients due to barriers such as lack of interoperable communication between teams, disjointed transfers between services, unnecessary time-consuming, re-evaluations and transitional pauses in time-dependent circumstances, deficiencies in cross-disciplinary education and quality assurance loops, and significant variability in patient care practices. Such barriers can lead to adverse outcomes in this fragile patient population.
SUMMARY: This article discusses the basis and rationale for the 'critical care cascade' concept, which contends that the optimal management of critically ill patients should be a continuum of care through the healthcare system. In the critical care cascade, each patient is enrolled on a 'pathway' of management based on their working diagnosis and each and every healthcare provider engaged along that continuum acts as part of a interconnected coordinated team that ensures a specific endpoint for these patients in a bundled manner that seamlessly extends from the prehospital and ED phases to the ICU and rehabilitation services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19606026     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832faef2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  11 in total

1.  Understanding of sepsis among emergency medical services: a survey study.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; David Carlbom; Ruth A Engelberg; Jonathan Larsen; Eileen M Bulger; Michael K Copass; Thomas D Rea
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 2.  Research in the Acute Rehabilitation Setting: a Bridge Too Far?

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Increasing critical care admissions from U.S. emergency departments, 2001-2009.

Authors:  Andrew A Herring; Adit A Ginde; Jahan Fahimi; Harrison J Alter; Judith H Maselli; Janice A Espinola; Ashley F Sullivan; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Sara Gray; Karen Burns; Clare Atzema; Alex Kiss; Andrew Worster; Damon C Scales; Gordon Rubenfeld; Jacques Lee
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  A consensus-based template for documenting and reporting in physician-staffed pre-hospital services.

Authors:  Andreas J Krüger; David Lockey; Jouni Kurola; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Maaret Castrén; Søren Mikkelsen; Hans Morten Lossius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Developing quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services: a consensus process.

Authors:  Helge Haugland; Marius Rehn; Pål Klepstad; Andreas Krüger
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Socioeconomic status, functional recovery, and long-term mortality among patients surviving acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  David A Alter; Barry Franklin; Dennis T Ko; Peter C Austin; Douglas S Lee; Paul I Oh; Therese A Stukel; Jack V Tu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors impacting on the activation and approach times of helicopter emergency medical services in four Alpine countries.

Authors:  Iztok Tomazin; Miljana Vegnuti; John Ellerton; Oliver Reisten; Guenther Sumann; Janko Kersnik
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Management of critically ill patients receiving noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Louise Rose
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-21

10.  Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in California Over 2000-2009: Implications for Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Seshadri C Mudumbai; Juli Barr; Jennifer Scott; Edward R Mariano; Edward Bertaccini; Hieu Nguyen; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Brian Cason; Ciaran S Phibbs; Todd Wagner
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.