OBJECTIVE: Genetic variation influences differential vulnerability to addiction within populations. However, it remains unclear whether differences in frequencies of vulnerability alleles contribute to disparities between populations and to what extent ancestry correlates with differential exposure to environmental risk factors, including poverty and trauma. METHOD: The authors used 186 ancestry-informative markers to measure African ancestry in 407 addicts and 457 comparison subjects self-identified as African Americans. The reference group was 1,051 individuals from the Human Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel, which includes 51 diverse populations representing most worldwide genetic diversity. RESULTS: African Americans varied in degrees of African, European, Middle Eastern, and Central Asian genetic heritage. The overall level of African ancestry was actually smaller among cocaine, opiate, and alcohol addicts (proportion=0.76-0.78) than nonaddicted African American comparison subjects (proportion=0.81). African ancestry was associated with living in impoverished neighborhoods, a factor previously associated with risk. There was no association between African ancestry and exposure to childhood abuse or neglect, a factor that strongly predicted all types of addictions. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that African genetic heritage does not increase the likelihood of genetic risk for addictions. They highlight the complex interrelation between genetic ancestry and social, economic, and environmental conditions and the strong relation of those factors to addiction. Studies of epidemiological samples characterized for genetic ancestry and social, psychological, demographic, economic, cultural, and historical factors are needed to better disentangle the effects of genetic and environmental factors underlying interpopulation differences in vulnerability to addiction and other health disparities.
OBJECTIVE: Genetic variation influences differential vulnerability to addiction within populations. However, it remains unclear whether differences in frequencies of vulnerability alleles contribute to disparities between populations and to what extent ancestry correlates with differential exposure to environmental risk factors, including poverty and trauma. METHOD: The authors used 186 ancestry-informative markers to measure African ancestry in 407 addicts and 457 comparison subjects self-identified as African Americans. The reference group was 1,051 individuals from the Human Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel, which includes 51 diverse populations representing most worldwide genetic diversity. RESULTS: African Americans varied in degrees of African, European, Middle Eastern, and Central Asian genetic heritage. The overall level of African ancestry was actually smaller among cocaine, opiate, and alcohol addicts (proportion=0.76-0.78) than nonaddicted African American comparison subjects (proportion=0.81). African ancestry was associated with living in impoverished neighborhoods, a factor previously associated with risk. There was no association between African ancestry and exposure to childhood abuse or neglect, a factor that strongly predicted all types of addictions. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that African genetic heritage does not increase the likelihood of genetic risk for addictions. They highlight the complex interrelation between genetic ancestry and social, economic, and environmental conditions and the strong relation of those factors to addiction. Studies of epidemiological samples characterized for genetic ancestry and social, psychological, demographic, economic, cultural, and historical factors are needed to better disentangle the effects of genetic and environmental factors underlying interpopulation differences in vulnerability to addiction and other health disparities.
Authors: D P Bernstein; L Fink; L Handelsman; J Foote; M Lovejoy; K Wenzel; E Sapareto; J Ruggiero Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Howard A Crystal; Sara Hamon; Matthew Randesi; Judith Cook; Kathryn Anastos; Jason Lazar; Chenglong Liu; Leigh Pearce; Elizabeth Golub; Victor Valcour; Kathleen M Weber; Susan Holman; Ann Ho; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Orna Levran; Matthew Randesi; Joel Correa da Rosa; Jurg Ott; John Rotrosen; Miriam Adelson; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Ann Hum Genet Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 1.670
Authors: Vadim Yuferov; Matthew Randesi; Eduardo R Butelman; Wim van den Brink; Peter Blanken; Jan M van Ree; Jürg Ott; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Matthew Randesi; Wim van den Brink; Orna Levran; Vadim Yuferov; Peter Blanken; Jan M van Ree; Jurg Ott; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Matthew Randesi; Wim van den Brink; Orna Levran; Peter Blanken; Eduardo R Butelman; Vadim Yuferov; Joel Correa da Rosa; Jurg Ott; Jan M van Ree; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 4.492