Literature DB >> 19605335

Comparison of clinical application of the Abbott HBV PCR kit and the VERSANT HBV DNA 3.0 test to measure serum hepatitis B virus DNA in Taiwanese patients.

Jeng-Fu Yang1, Ya-Yun Lin, Jee-Fu Huang, Shu-Fen Liu, Pei-Yu Chu, Ming-Yen Hsieh, Zu-Yau Lin, Shinn-Cherng Chen, Liang-Yen Wang, Chia-Yen Dai, Wan-Long Chuang, Ming-Lung Yu.   

Abstract

With an estimated 350-400 million people worldwide chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and the subsequent serious complications caused by liver damage including cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma, HBV infection remains a global health issue, particularly in Taiwan, an HBV-hyperendemic area. Sensitive and accurate quantification of HBV DNA is necessary to monitor patients with chronic hepatitis B who are receiving antiviral therapy to determine treatment response and adapt therapy. We evaluated and compared the clinical performance of two HBV DNA assays based on different technologies: the RealArt HBV PCR Kit (Abbott HBV DNA PCR kit, real-time polymerase chain reaction assay, detection limit: 27 IU/mL) and the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 assay (Bayer, branched DNA signal amplification assay, detection limit: 357 IU/mL). Serum levels of HBV DNA in 173 chronic HBV carriers were determined using both the RealArt HBV PCR Kit and the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 test. Of the 173 samples analyzed for baseline viral load detection, HBV DNA was quantifiable in 147 patients (82.1%) by the RealArt HBV PCR Kit, which was significantly higher than the 92 (53.2%) samples quantified by the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 assay. A total of 86 (49.7%) samples were quantifiable by both assays, whereas 25 (14.5%) were below the detection limit of both assays. The HBV DNA quantification values measured by the RealArt HBV PCR Kit and the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 assay were positively correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = 0.932, p < 0.001). On average, the results derived from the RealArt HBV PCR Kit were 0.67 log lower than those of the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 assay. HBV DNA concentrations were significantly higher in 63 HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-seropositive patients than in 110 HBeAg-seronegative patients (5.42 +/- 2.34 logs vs. 3.21 +/- 2.27 logs, p < 0.001). The RealArt HBV PCR Kit is more sensitive and has a wider dynamic range than the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 assay in the clinical setting of chronic hepatitis B patients. The sensitivity and wide dynamic range of the PCR assay allow optimal monitoring and timely adaptation of antiviral therapy. Nevertheless, the HBV DNA values measured by the RealArt HBV PCR Kit and the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 assay were significantly correlated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19605335     DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70536-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  4 in total

1.  Detection of hepatitis B virus infection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mallika Ghosh; Srijita Nandi; Shrinwanti Dutta; Malay Kumar Saha
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-18

2.  Hepatitis B virus DNA splicing in Lebanese blood donors and genotype A to E strains: implications for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification and infectivity.

Authors:  Mira El Chaar; Tamima El Jisr; Jean-Pierre Allain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of Abbott and Da-an real-time PCR for quantitating serum HBV DNA.

Authors:  Ning Qiu; Rui Li; Jian-Guo Yu; Wen Yang; Wei Zhang; Yong An; Tong Li; Xue-En Liu; Hui Zhuang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Alu-based cell-free DNA: a novel biomarker for screening of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chen Qian; Shaoqing Ju; Jing Qi; Jianmei Zhao; Xianjuan Shen; Rongrong Jing; Juan Yu; Li Li; Yingjuan Shi; Lurong Zhang; Zhiwei Wang; Hui Cong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.