Literature DB >> 19604192

Thyromental distance measurement--fingers don't rule.

P A Baker1, A Depuydt, J M D Thompson.   

Abstract

Thyromental distance (TMD) measurement is commonly used to predict difficult intubation. We surveyed anaesthetists to determine how this test was being performed. Comparative accuracy of ruler measurement and other forms of measurement were also assessed in a meta-analysis of published literature. Of respondents, 72% used fingers for TMD measurement and also considered three finger widths the minimum acceptable TMD. In terms of distance, the minimum acceptable TMD was felt to be 6.5 cm by 55% of respondents. However, the actual width of three fingers was (range) 4.6-7.0 cm (mean 5.9 cm), with significant differences between genders and between proximal and distal interphalangeal joints. The meta-analysis showed ruler measurement increased test sensitivity (48% (95% CI 43-53) vs 16% (95% CI 14-19) without a ruler), when predicting difficult intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19604192     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05985.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment.

Authors:  Justin S Fulkerson; Heather M Moore; Tristan S Anderson; Robert F Lowe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A technical modification for percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective case series study on one hundred patients.

Authors:  Joao B Rezende-Neto; Argenil J Oliveira; Mario P Neto; Fernando A Botoni; Sandro B Rizoli
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Prediction of ease of laryngoscopy and intubation-role of upper lip bite test, modified mallampati classification, and thyromental distance in various combination.

Authors:  Anjana S Wajekar; Shrividya Chellam; Pratibha V Toal
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

4.  Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?

Authors:  Bin Wang; Hui Peng; Weidong Yao; Ling Guo; Xiaoju Jin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Anatomic features of the neck as predictive markers of difficult direct laryngoscopy in men and women: A prospective study.

Authors:  Chara Liaskou; Liaskou Chara; Eleftherios Vouzounerakis; Vouzounerakis Eleftherios; Maria Moirasgenti; Moirasgenti Maria; Anastasia Trikoupi; Trikoupi Anastasia; Chryssoula Staikou; Staikou Chryssoula
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-03

6.  Ethnicity and upper airway measurements: A study in South Indian population.

Authors:  Kalpana P Balakrishnan; Punitha A Chockalingam
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-08

7.  The diagnostic validity of clinical airway assessments for predicting difficult laryngoscopy using a grey zone approach.

Authors:  Jeong Jin Min; Gahyun Kim; Eunhee Kim; Jong-Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Preoperative predictors of poor laryngoscope views in pediatric population undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Madan Mohan Maddali; Haifa Mohammed Ali Al-Zaabi; Is'haq Said Salim Al-Aamri; Nishant Ram Arora; Sathiya Murthi Panchatcharam
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

9.  Comparison of thyromental height test with ratio of height to thyromental distance, thyromental distance, and modified Mallampati test in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective study.

Authors:  Pratibha Panjiar; Anjali Kochhar; Kharat M Bhat; Mudassir A Bhat
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.