Literature DB >> 19603876

Annoyance from environmental noise across the lifespan.

Pascal W M Van Gerven1, Henk Vos, Martin P J Van Boxtel, Sabine A Janssen, Henk M E Miedema.   

Abstract

Curvilinear effects of age on self-reported annoyance from environmental noise were investigated in a pooled international and a Dutch sample of in total 62,983 individuals aged between 15 and 102 years. All respondents were frequently exposed to varying levels of transportation noise (i.e., aircraft, road traffic, and railway noise). Results reveal an inverted U-shaped pattern, where the largest number of highly annoyed individuals was found in the middle-aged segment of the sample (peaking around 45 years) while the lowest number was found in the youngest and oldest age segments. This pattern was independent of noise exposure level and self-reported noise sensitivity. The inverted U-shape explains the absence of linear age effects in previous studies. The results are discussed in light of theories predicting an age-related vulnerability to noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603876     DOI: 10.1121/1.3147510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  2Loud?: Community mapping of exposure to traffic noise with mobile phones.

Authors:  Simone Leao; Kok-Leong Ong; Adam Krezel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise.

Authors:  Daniel Shepherd; David Welch; Kim N Dirks; Renata Mathews
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Aircraft noise and quality of life around Frankfurt Airport.

Authors:  Dirk Schreckenberg; Markus Meis; Cara Kahl; Christin Peschel; Thomas Eikmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Road-traffic noise: annoyance, risk perception, and noise sensitivity in the Finnish adult population.

Authors:  Enembe Oku Okokon; Anu W Turunen; Sari Ung-Lanki; Anna-Kaisa Vartiainen; Pekka Tiittanen; Timo Lanki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effect of Attitudinal, Situational and Demographic Factors on Annoyance Due to Environmental Vibration and Noise from Construction of a Light Rapid Transit System.

Authors:  Daniel Wong-McSweeney; James Woodcock; David Waddington; Eulalia Peris; Zbigniew Koziel; Andy Moorhouse; María Dolores Redel-Macías
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Combined Effects of High-Speed Railway Noise and Ground Vibrations on Annoyance.

Authors:  Shigenori Yokoshima; Takashi Morihara; Tetsumi Sato; Takashi Yano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance.

Authors:  Rainer Guski; Dirk Schreckenberg; Rudolf Schuemer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Noise Disturbance and Potential Hearing Loss Due to Exposure of Dental Equipment in Flemish Dentists.

Authors:  Michael Dierickx; Suzanne Verschraegen; Els Wierinck; Guy Willems; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Focused study on the quiet side effect in dwellings highly exposed to road traffic noise.

Authors:  Timothy Van Renterghem; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.