Literature DB >> 19603857

Pile driving zone of responsiveness extends beyond 20 km for harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena (L.)).

Jakob Tougaard1, Jacob Carstensen, Jonas Teilmann, Henrik Skov, Per Rasmussen.   

Abstract

Behavioral reactions of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) to underwater noise from pile driving were studied. Steel monopile foundations (4 m diameter) for offshore wind turbines were driven into hard sand in shallow water at Horns Reef, the North Sea. The impulsive sounds generated had high sound pressures [source level 235 dB re 1 microPa(pp) at 1 m, transmission loss 18 log(distance)] with a strong low frequency emphasis but with significant energy up to 100 kHz. Reactions of porpoises were studied by passive acoustic loggers (T-PODs). Intervals between echolocation events (encounters) were analyzed, and a significant increase was found from average 5.9 h between encounters in the construction period as a whole to on average 7.5 h between first and second encounters after pile driving. The size of the zone of responsiveness could not be inferred as no grading in response was observed with distance from the pile driving site but must have exceeded 21 km (distance to most distant T-POD station).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603857     DOI: 10.1121/1.3132523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Renewable energy: Wind power tests the waters.

Authors:  Gene Russo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) can detect auditory cues while diving.

Authors:  Kirstin Anderson Hansen; Alyssa Maxwell; Ursula Siebert; Ole Næsbye Larsen; Magnus Wahlberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-05-05

3.  High rates of vessel noise disrupt foraging in wild harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Danuta Maria Wisniewska; Mark Johnson; Jonas Teilmann; Ursula Siebert; Anders Galatius; Rune Dietz; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Harbour porpoises react to low levels of high frequency vessel noise.

Authors:  Monika Dyndo; Danuta Maria Wiśniewska; Laia Rojano-Doñate; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Assessing environmental impacts of offshore wind farms: lessons learned and recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Helen Bailey; Kate L Brookes; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Aquat Biosyst       Date:  2014-09-14

6.  Underwater noise levels in UK waters.

Authors:  Nathan D Merchant; Kate L Brookes; Rebecca C Faulkner; Anthony W J Bicknell; Brendan J Godley; Matthew J Witt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Avoidance of wind farms by harbour seals is limited to pile driving activities.

Authors:  Debbie J F Russell; Gordon D Hastie; David Thompson; Vincent M Janik; Philip S Hammond; Lindesay A S Scott-Hayward; Jason Matthiopoulos; Esther L Jones; Bernie J McConnell
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 6.528

Review 8.  Consolidating the State of Knowledge: A Synoptical Review of Wind Energy's Wildlife Effects.

Authors:  Eva Schuster; Lea Bulling; Johann Köppel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Short-term disturbance by a commercial two-dimensional seismic survey does not lead to long-term displacement of harbour porpoises.

Authors:  Paul M Thompson; Kate L Brookes; Isla M Graham; Tim R Barton; Keith Needham; Gareth Bradbury; Nathan D Merchant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Responses of two marine top predators to an offshore wind farm.

Authors:  Gillian C Vallejo; Kate Grellier; Emily J Nelson; Ross M McGregor; Sarah J Canning; Fiona M Caryl; Nancy McLean
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.