Literature DB >> 19603669

Evaluation of SBRC-gastric and SBRC-intestinal methods for the prediction of in vivo relative lead bioavailability in contaminated soils.

Albert L Juhasz1, John Weber, Euan Smith, Ravi Naidu, Bernd Marschner, Matthew Rees, Allan Rofe, Tim Kuchel, Lloyd Sansom.   

Abstract

In this study, lead (Pb) bioaccessibility in contaminated soils was assessed using an in vitro method (SBRC) encompassing gastric (SBRC-G) and intestinal (SBRC-I) phases. Initially, bioaccessibility studies were performed with a Pb reference material (Pb acetate, 1-10 mg L(-1)) in order to determine the influence of pH on Pb solubility. In the gastric phase (pH 1.5), Pb solubility was 100% (100 +/- 2.9%, n = 16) irrespective of the Pb concentration added, however, when the pH of the intestinal phase was increased to near neutral, Pb solubility decreased to 14.3 +/- 7.2%. In contaminated soils, Pb bioaccessibility varied from 35.7 to 64.1% and 1.2 to 2.7% for SBRC-G and SBRC-I phases, respectively. When relative bioaccessibility (Rel-SBRC-I) was calculated by adjusting the dissolution of Pb from contaminated soils by the solubility of Pb acetate at pH 6.5 (intestinal phase pH); Rel-SBRC-I values ranged from 11.7-26.1%. A stepwise regression model based on Pearson correlation factors was used to determine the suitability of in vitro assays for predicting in vivo (swine assay) relative Pb bioavailability. Rel-SBRC-I provided the best estimate of in vivo relative Pb bioavailability for soils used in this study (in vive relative Pb bioavailability [%] = Rel-SBRC-I [pH 6.5%] x 0.58 + 1.98, P = 0.53). The versatility of Rel-SBRC-I was demonstrated by accurately predicting relative Pb bioavailability from other reported in vivo studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603669     DOI: 10.1021/es803238u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of relative bioavailability of heavy metals in soil using in vivo mouse model and its implication for risk assessment compared with bioaccessibility using in vitro assay.

Authors:  Yuan Kang; Weijian Pan; Siyun Liang; Ning Li; Lixuan Zeng; Qiuyun Zhang; Jiwen Luo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Quantifying statistical relationships between commonly used in vitro models for estimating lead bioaccessibility.

Authors:  Kaihong Yan; Zhaomin Dong; Yanju Liu; Ravi Naidu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Interaction effects of As, Cd and Pb on their respective bioaccessibility with time in co-contaminated soils assessed by the Unified BARGE Method.

Authors:  Qing Xia; Dane Lamb; Cheng Peng; Jack C Ng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Influence of ageing on lead bioavailability in soils: a swine study.

Authors:  M A Ayanka Wijayawardena; Ravi Naidu; Mallavarapu Megharaj; Dane Lamb; Palanisami Thavamani; Tim Kuchel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Relationship between Pb relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility in phosphate amended soil: Uncertainty associated with predicting Pb immobilization efficacy using in vitro assays.

Authors:  Farzana Kastury; Silvia Placitu; John Boland; Ranju R Karna; Kirk G Scheckel; Euan Smith; Albert L Juhasz
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  An inhalation-ingestion bioaccessibility assay (IIBA) for the assessment of exposure to metal(loid)s in PM10.

Authors:  Farzana Kastury; E Smith; Ranju R Karna; Kirk G Scheckel; A L Juhasz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Bioaccessibility of metals in alloys: evaluation of three surrogate biofluids.

Authors:  Wendy E Hillwalker; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Mineralogy affects geoavailability, bioaccessibility and bioavailability of zinc.

Authors:  Ramon M Molina; Laurel A Schaider; Thomas C Donaghey; James P Shine; Joseph D Brain
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Bioaccessibility of potentially toxic elements in mine residue particles.

Authors:  Corona-Sánchez Jesús Eulises; Ma Del Carmen A González-Chávez; Rogelio Carrillo-González; José Luis García-Cué; Demetrio S Fernández-Reynoso; Matthew Noerpel; Kirk G Scheckel
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.238

10.  Experimental determination of the oral bioavailability and bioaccessibility of lead particles.

Authors:  Elise Deshommes; Robert Tardif; Marc Edwards; Sébastien Sauvé; Michèle Prévost
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.