INTRODUCTION: The medical conditions shared by hospital emergency services and community-hospital neurology clinics (CHNC) have not been described, and the quality of the medical care received in these conditions has not been evaluated in our environment. METHODS: Over a 2 month period, those patients presenting at any of the seven CHNC in a Health Care Area 1 of Madrid due to previously attended medical conditions in the emergency services were systematically registered. The area neurologists of the CHNC collected administrative and clinical variables and made a judgment on the medical care (primary outcome measure) and diagnoses (secondary outcome measure) received. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were included (mean age: 58 years; 60% women). The inclusion rate was one patient per working day, and 31% of patients were visited out of the established quota number of patients for the clinic. The most frequent reasons for visiting the emergency room were: headache (20%), focal neurological syndrome (16%) and loss of consciousness (14%). The most frequent diagnoses at the CHNC were: primary headache (19 %), stroke (11%) and epilepsy (9 %). Emergency care was deemed correct in 56 % of patients. When the patients with intervention were compared to those with no intervention, participation of the neurology service in the emergency room was associated to a greater percentage of correct diagnoses (59% vs. 41%; p=0.019) and care (69% vs. 47%; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The medical conditions shared with the emergency services represent a small but relevant proportion of the patients assisted in the CHNC. Some of these conditions (primary headaches, syncopes) should be canalized into primary health care. Others (epilepsy) require a circuit between emergency room and CNNC, but the appointment system should be adapted. The intervention of a neurologist in the emergency room raises the quality of the care.
INTRODUCTION: The medical conditions shared by hospital emergency services and community-hospital neurology clinics (CHNC) have not been described, and the quality of the medical care received in these conditions has not been evaluated in our environment. METHODS: Over a 2 month period, those patients presenting at any of the seven CHNC in a Health Care Area 1 of Madrid due to previously attended medical conditions in the emergency services were systematically registered. The area neurologists of the CHNC collected administrative and clinical variables and made a judgment on the medical care (primary outcome measure) and diagnoses (secondary outcome measure) received. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were included (mean age: 58 years; 60% women). The inclusion rate was one patient per working day, and 31% of patients were visited out of the established quota number of patients for the clinic. The most frequent reasons for visiting the emergency room were: headache (20%), focal neurological syndrome (16%) and loss of consciousness (14%). The most frequent diagnoses at the CHNC were: primary headache (19 %), stroke (11%) and epilepsy (9 %). Emergency care was deemed correct in 56 % of patients. When the patients with intervention were compared to those with no intervention, participation of the neurology service in the emergency room was associated to a greater percentage of correct diagnoses (59% vs. 41%; p=0.019) and care (69% vs. 47%; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The medical conditions shared with the emergency services represent a small but relevant proportion of the patients assisted in the CHNC. Some of these conditions (primary headaches, syncopes) should be canalized into primary health care. Others (epilepsy) require a circuit between emergency room and CNNC, but the appointment system should be adapted. The intervention of a neurologist in the emergency room raises the quality of the care.
Authors: Achary Umesh; Guru S Gowda; Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar; Dwarakanath Srinivas; Bharath Rose Dawn; Ragasudha Botta; Ravi Yadav; Suresh Bada Math Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Date: 2017 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.383