AIM: We sought to assess the effect of sunitinib and lapatinib applied either alone or in combination, on U87 and M059K glioma cells. METHODS: Both cell lines were cultured as recommended by the manufacturer. Sunitinib and lapatinib were applied, either separately or in combination, in the cultured cells after cell attachment at doses of 10 nM, 100 nM, 1 microM and 10 microM. To determine whether the agents affect the proliferation of glioma cells, the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 dimethyltetrazolium bromide assay was used. Apoptosis was detected using annexin V/propidium iodide detection assay, migration assay was performed in 24-well microchemotaxis chambers. The release of MMPs into the culture medium of U87 and M059K cells was measured by zymography. RESULTS: Both agents, administered either alone or in combination, decreased cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner 48 h after their application in both cell lines. The inhibition of their combination was statistically different than the inhibition of each agent alone. Apoptosis was increased and migration of U87 and M059K cells was inhibited either by each agent alone or their combination. MMPs levels remained unaffected by the application of both agents in U87 cells. However, MMP-9 and MMP-2 levels were decreased 48 h after treatment of M059K cells with sunitinib either alone or in combination with lapatinib. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib and/or lapatinib appear to exhibit significant effects on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of glioma cells. When applied alone, sunitinib appears to be a more potent inhibitor than lapatinib.
AIM: We sought to assess the effect of sunitinib and lapatinib applied either alone or in combination, on U87 and M059K glioma cells. METHODS: Both cell lines were cultured as recommended by the manufacturer. Sunitinib and lapatinib were applied, either separately or in combination, in the cultured cells after cell attachment at doses of 10 nM, 100 nM, 1 microM and 10 microM. To determine whether the agents affect the proliferation of glioma cells, the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 dimethyltetrazolium bromide assay was used. Apoptosis was detected using annexin V/propidium iodide detection assay, migration assay was performed in 24-well microchemotaxis chambers. The release of MMPs into the culture medium of U87 and M059K cells was measured by zymography. RESULTS: Both agents, administered either alone or in combination, decreased cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner 48 h after their application in both cell lines. The inhibition of their combination was statistically different than the inhibition of each agent alone. Apoptosis was increased and migration of U87 and M059K cells was inhibited either by each agent alone or their combination. MMPs levels remained unaffected by the application of both agents in U87 cells. However, MMP-9 and MMP-2 levels were decreased 48 h after treatment of M059K cells with sunitinib either alone or in combination with lapatinib. CONCLUSION:Sunitinib and/or lapatinib appear to exhibit significant effects on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of glioma cells. When applied alone, sunitinib appears to be a more potent inhibitor than lapatinib.
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Brian I Rini; Ronald M Bukowski; Brendan D Curti; Daniel J George; Gary R Hudes; Bruce G Redman; Kim A Margolin; Jaime R Merchan; George Wilding; Michelle S Ginsberg; Jennifer Bacik; Sindy T Kim; Charles M Baum; M Dror Michaelson Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ranjit K Goudar; Qing Shi; Mark D Hjelmeland; Stephen T Keir; Roger E McLendon; Carol J Wikstrand; Elizabeth D Reese; Charles A Conrad; Peter Traxler; Heidi A Lane; David A Reardon; Webster K Cavenee; Xiao-Fan Wang; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman; Jeremy N Rich Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Joseph A Blansfield; Diana Caragacianu; H Richard Alexander; Michael A Tangrea; Shane Y Morita; Dominique Lorang; Peter Schafer; George Muller; David Stirling; Richard E Royal; Steven K Libutti Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paul A Clark; Mari Iida; Daniel M Treisman; Haviryaji Kalluri; Sathyapriya Ezhilan; Michael Zorniak; Deric L Wheeler; John S Kuo Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Yan Cheng; Yi Zhang; Li Zhang; Xingcong Ren; Kathryn J Huber-Keener; Xiaoyuan Liu; Lei Zhou; Jason Liao; Heike Keihack; Li Yan; Eric Rubin; Jin-Ming Yang Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Olga Martinho; Renato Silva-Oliveira; Vera Miranda-Gonçalves; Carlos Clara; José Reynaldo Almeida; André Lopes Carvalho; João Taborda Barata; Rui Manuel Reis Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Steven G Dubois; Suzanne Shusterman; Ashish M Ingle; Charlotte H Ahern; Joel M Reid; Bing Wu; Sylvain Baruchel; Julia Glade-Bender; Percy Ivy; Holcombe E Grier; Peter C Adamson; Susan M Blaney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sylvia Moeckel; Katharina Meyer; Petra Leukel; Fabian Heudorfer; Corinna Seliger; Christina Stangl; Ulrich Bogdahn; Martin Proescholdt; Alexander Brawanski; Arabel Vollmann-Zwerenz; Markus J Riemenschneider; Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff; Rainer Spang; Peter Hau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dionysia Lymperatou; Efstathia Giannopoulou; Angelos K Koutras; Haralabos P Kalofonos Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 3.411