Literature DB >> 19602688

Prevalence and repair of intraoperatively diagnosed patent foramen ovale and association with perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

Richard A Krasuski1, Stephen A Hart, Drew Allen, Athar Qureshi, Gosta Pettersson, Penny L Houghtaling, Lillian H Batizy, Eugene Blackstone.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A recent survey suggested that cardiothoracic surgeons may alter planned procedures to repair incidentally discovered patent foramen ovale (PFO). How frequently this occurs and the impact on outcomes remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the frequency of incidentally discovered PFO closure during cardiothoracic surgery and determine its perioperative and long-term impact. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We reviewed the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms of 13,092 patients without prior diagnosis of PFO or atrial septal defect undergoing surgery at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, from 1995 through 2006. Postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected until discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause hospital mortality and stroke were predetermined primary outcomes; length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and time on cardiopulmonary bypass were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Intraoperative PFO was diagnosed in 2277 patients in the study population (17%), and risk factors for stroke were similar in patients with and without PFO. After propensity matching was performed with the comparator groups, patients with PFO demonstrated similar rates of in-hospital death (3.4% vs 2.6%, P = .11) and postoperative stroke (2.3% vs 2.3%, P = .84). Surgical closure was performed in 639 PFO patients (28%), and surgeons were more likely to close defects in patients who were younger (mean [SD] age, 61.1 [14] vs 64.4 [13] years; P < .001), were undergoing mitral or tricuspid valve surgery (51% vs 32%, P < .001), or had history of transient ischemic attack or stroke (16% vs 10%, P < .001). Patients with repaired PFO demonstrated a 2.47-times greater odds (95% confidence interval, 1.02-6.00) of having a postoperative stroke compared with those with unrepaired PFO (2.8% vs 1.2%, P = .04). Long-term analysis demonstrated that PFO repair was associated with no survival difference (P = .12).
CONCLUSIONS: Incidental PFO is common in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery but is not associated with increased perioperative morbidity or mortality. Surgical closure appears unrelated to long-term survival and may increase postoperative stroke risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19602688     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  16 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative echocardiography in valvular heart disease: an evidence-based appraisal.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Martin D Abel; Rakesh M Suri; William K Freeman; Roger L Click; Thoralf M Sundt; Hartzell V Schaff; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Current status of percutaneous PFO closure.

Authors:  N Rohrhoff; J P Vavalle; S Halim; T L Kiefer; J K Harrison
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke.

Authors:  Shunichi Homma; Marco R Di Tullio
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Transesophageal Echocardiography, Acute Kidney Injury, and Length of Hospitalization Among Adults Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Emily J MacKay; Rachel M Werner; Peter W Groeneveld; Nimesh D Desai; Peter P Reese; Jacob T Gutsche; John G Augoustides; Mark D Neuman
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Index event bias as an explanation for the paradoxes of recurrence risk research.

Authors:  Issa J Dahabreh; David M Kent
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Contemporary approach to paradoxical embolism.

Authors:  Matthew Nayor; Bradley A Maron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Role of PFO Closure in Ischemic Stroke Prevention.

Authors:  Nicholas D Osteraas; Alejandro Vargas; Laurel Cherian; Sarah Song
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-14

8.  Intraoperative echocardiography for patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Authors:  Adam Evans; Sanjay Dwarakanath; Charles Hogue; Marybeth Brady; Jeremy Poppers; Steven Miller; Menachem M Weiner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Association of Preoperatively Diagnosed Patent Foramen Ovale With Perioperative Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Pauline Y Ng; Andrew K-Y Ng; Balachundhar Subramaniam; Sara M Burns; Fanny Herisson; Fanny P Timm; Cand Med; Maira I Rudolph; Cand Med; Flora Scheffenbichler; Cand Med; Sabine Friedrich; Cand Med; Timothy T Houle; Deepak L Bhatt; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patent foramen ovale. Incidental patent foramen ovale during cardiothoracic surgery: to repair or not to repair?

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Ana C Garrido-Castro; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.