OBJECTIVE: To characterize hypertension management in an academic family medicine clinic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional chart review. SETTING: Academic family medicine clinic in Edmonton, Alta. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 210 patients with 1 or more visits for hypertension during the previous 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, current antihypertensive therapies, most recent blood pressure measurements, and compelling indications according to the 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 185 subjects (88%) were prescribed antihypertensive medications, and 89 (42%) had controlled hypertension. Younger subjects, people with diabetes, and people not receiving antihypertensive medication therapy appeared less likely to have controlled hypertension. There were 76 subjects (36%) prescribed 1 antihypertensive medication, 65 subjects (31%) prescribed 2 antihypertensive medications, and 44 (21%) prescribed 3 or more antihypertensive medications. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed for 51% of the subjects, diuretics for 47%, beta-blockers for 27%, calcium channel blockers for 23%, angiotensin receptor blockers for 20%, and alpha-blockers for 1%. CONCLUSION: Hypertension treatment and control rates in this academic family medicine clinic appear to be better than those in the general population. Following the principles of a continuous quality improvement process, this information will serve as an important foundation for identifying areas to improve hypertension management in the clinic.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize hypertension management in an academic family medicine clinic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional chart review. SETTING: Academic family medicine clinic in Edmonton, Alta. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 210 patients with 1 or more visits for hypertension during the previous 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, current antihypertensive therapies, most recent blood pressure measurements, and compelling indications according to the 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 185 subjects (88%) were prescribed antihypertensive medications, and 89 (42%) had controlled hypertension. Younger subjects, people with diabetes, and people not receiving antihypertensive medication therapy appeared less likely to have controlled hypertension. There were 76 subjects (36%) prescribed 1 antihypertensive medication, 65 subjects (31%) prescribed 2 antihypertensive medications, and 44 (21%) prescribed 3 or more antihypertensive medications. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed for 51% of the subjects, diuretics for 47%, beta-blockers for 27%, calcium channel blockers for 23%, angiotensin receptor blockers for 20%, and alpha-blockers for 1%. CONCLUSION:Hypertension treatment and control rates in this academic family medicine clinic appear to be better than those in the general population. Following the principles of a continuous quality improvement process, this information will serve as an important foundation for identifying areas to improve hypertension management in the clinic.
Authors: L S Phillips; W T Branch; C B Cook; J P Doyle; I M El-Kebbi; D L Gallina; C D Miller; D C Ziemer; C S Barnes Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-11-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ramachandran S Vasan; Alexa Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; Martin G Larson; William B Kannel; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-02-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Susan A Oliveria; Pablo Lapuerta; Bruce D McCarthy; Gilbert J L'Italien; Dan R Berlowitz; Steven M Asch Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2002-02-25
Authors: Carel F Schaars; Petra Denig; Willeke N Kasje; Roy E Stewart; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Wayne Putnam; Beverley Lawson; Farokh Buhariwalla; Mary Goodfellow; Rose Anne Goodine; Jennifer Hall; Kendrick Lacey; Ian MacDonald; Frederick I Burge; Nandini Natarajan; Ingrid Sketris; Beth Mann; Peggy Dunbar; Kristine Van Aarsen; Marshall S Godwin Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 2.497