Literature DB >> 19601703

Opioid switching and rotation in primary care: implementation and clinical utility.

Neal E Slatkin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Opioid therapy is the standard treatment for moderate-to-severe cancer pain and is becoming a more frequent treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic noncancer pain. Response to opioids varies significantly between patients and even within the individual patient at different stages of treatment. Finding an opioid at a dose that provides adequate long-term analgesia with minimal adverse effects can be difficult. Opioid switching and opioid rotation, at different stages of therapy, represent two clinical strategies used to optimize opioid response for patients with moderate-to-severe pain.
OBJECTIVES: Review the theoretical and clinical evidence supporting the concepts of opioid switching and rotation, outline the conditions under which these practices should be considered, and briefly suggest practical steps for their implementation. SCOPE: Clinical literature, clinical practice and guideline databases, and professional society websites were searched for articles or reports describing opioid switching or opioid rotation in chronic pain therapy; variability in patient response to opioid therapy; physiologic, pharmacologic, and genetic factors that affect clinical response to opioids; and practical approaches to maximizing analgesia and minimizing adverse effects in opioid therapy. It is outside the scope of this review to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic aspects that affect changes in opioid therapy.
FINDINGS: The variability in de novo clinical response to opioids likely represents the interaction of the varying properties of the individual opioids with the variability in individual patient biology. This interaction forms the rationale for opioid switching and explains its clinical utility. As with opioid switching, success with opioid rotation is related to the myriad of factors determining an individual patient's response to a specific opioid. However, the benefits of opioid rotation also derive from a partial reversal of tolerance at the mu-opioid receptor and the response of different micro-opioid receptor subtypes to the different opioids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19601703     DOI: 10.1185/03007990903120158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  21 in total

1.  Oxymorphone Extended-Release Tablets (Opana ER) For the Management of Chronic Pain: A Practical Review for Pharmacists.

Authors:  David S Craig
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  OROS hydromorphone prolonged release: a review of its use in the management of chronic, moderate to severe pain.

Authors:  Natalie J Carter; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Opioid pharmaceuticals and addiction: the issues, and research directions seeking solutions.

Authors:  Wendy M Walwyn; Karen A Miotto; Christopher J Evans
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Lack of Antinociceptive Cross-Tolerance With Co-Administration of Morphine and Fentanyl Into the Periaqueductal Gray of Male Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Erin N Bobeck; Shauna M Schoo; Susan L Ingram; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Feasibility study of rapid opioid rotation and titration.

Authors:  Marina Korkmazsky; Javid Ghandehari; Angela Sanchez; Hung-Mo Lin; Huong-Mo Lin; Marco Pappagallo
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Differences between opioids: pharmacological, experimental, clinical and economical perspectives.

Authors:  Asbjørn M Drewes; Rasmus D Jensen; Lecia M Nielsen; Joanne Droney; Lona L Christrup; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Julia Riley; Albert Dahan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Switching from oxycodone to methadone in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante; Patrizia Ferrera; Patrizia Villari; Claudio Adile; Alessandra Casuccio
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Strategies to reduce the tampering and subsequent abuse of long-acting opioids: potential risks and benefits of formulations with physical or pharmacologic deterrents to tampering.

Authors:  Steven P Stanos; Patricia Bruckenthal; Robert L Barkin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Analgesia and central side-effects: two separate dimensions of morphine response.

Authors:  Joanne M Droney; Sophy K Gretton; Hiroe Sato; Joy R Ross; Ruth Branford; Kenneth I Welsh; William Cookson; Julia Riley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Modified glasgow prognostic score predicting high conversion ratio in opioid switching from oral oxycodone to transdermal fentanyl in patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  Shu-Shan Jia; Li Shang; Ming-E Li; Dong-Mei Zhao; Wen-Hua Xu; Yao-Qi Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.