Literature DB >> 19601632

Analysis of RP-HPLC loading conditions for maximizing peptide identifications in shotgun proteomics.

Amelia Peterson1, Laura Hohmann, Li Huang, Bong Kim, Jimmy K Eng, Daniel B Martin.   

Abstract

Substantial energy and resources have been invested in improving mass spectrometry (MS) instrumentation, upstream sample preparation protocols, and database search strategies to maximize peptide and protein identifications. The role of HPLC sample loading methods in maximizing MS identifications has been largely overlooked, and there exists an immense heterogeneity in the methods employed in the proteomics literature. We sought to optimize loading methods by testing multiple loading conditions (buffer composition, resin, initial gradient) using tryptic digests of an 18 protein mixture and whole yeast lysate. The loading buffer acetonitrile (ACN) concentration greatly affected peptide identifications: up to a 26% increase in peptide identifications was observed by decreasing the ACN concentration from 5 to 2% during sample loading. Hydrophilic peptides were the main contributors to the increase in peptide identifications and, at higher ACN concentrations, were washed from the precolumn during desalting. Sampling of the hydrophilic peptides was enhanced by using a shallow initial ACN gradient. The results were found to be resin-specific and not generalizable. Our investigation demonstrates the often unappreciated importance of optimizing sample loading conditions to reflect the aims of the research and the characteristics of the LC configurations employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19601632      PMCID: PMC2757279          DOI: 10.1021/pr9001417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  22 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry in proteomics.

Authors:  R Aebersold; D R Goodlett
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Advanced nanoscale separations and mass spectrometry for sensitive high-throughput proteomics.

Authors:  Yufeng Shen; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Sequence-specific retention calculator. Algorithm for peptide retention prediction in ion-pair RP-HPLC: application to 300- and 100-A pore size C18 sorbents.

Authors:  Oleg V Krokhin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Sequence-specific retention calculator. A family of peptide retention time prediction algorithms in reversed-phase HPLC: applicability to various chromatographic conditions and columns.

Authors:  Vic Spicer; Andriy Yamchuk; John Cortens; Sandra Sousa; Werner Ens; Kenneth G Standing; John A Wilkins; Oleg V Krokhin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Evaluation of on-line solid-phase extraction parameters for hyphenated, high-performance liquid chromatography-solid-phase extraction-nuclear magnetic resonance applications.

Authors:  Cailean Clarkson; Martin Sibum; Robert Mensen; Jerzy W Jaroszewski
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 7.  Multidimensional LC separations in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Akira Motoyama; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Essential enrichment strategies in phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Martijn W H Pinkse; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2006

9.  Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Blagoy Blagoev; Florian Gnad; Boris Macek; Chanchal Kumar; Peter Mortensen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Mass spectrometry for proteomics.

Authors:  Xuemei Han; Aaron Aslanian; John R Yates
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Performance comparisons of nano-LC systems, electrospray sources and LC-MS-MS platforms.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Jennifer S Cobb; Joshua L Johnson; Qi Wang; Jeffrey N Agar
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 1.618

2.  Evaluation and optimization of mass spectrometric settings during data-dependent acquisition mode: focus on LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzers.

Authors:  Anastasia Kalli; Geoffrey T Smith; Michael J Sweredoski; Sonja Hess
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Shotgun Proteomics of Tomato Fruits: Evaluation, Optimization and Validation of Sample Preparation Methods and Mass Spectrometric Parameters.

Authors:  Himabindu V Kilambi; Kalyani Manda; Hemalatha Sanivarapu; Vineet K Maurya; Rameshwar Sharma; Yellamaraju Sreelakshmi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Quantification of Multifunctional Dipeptide YA from Oyster Hydrolysate for Quality Control and Efficacy Evaluation.

Authors:  Cheng-Liang Xie; Sang Soo Kang; Ciyong Lu; Yeung Joon Choi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.