Literature DB >> 19597782

Gene set enrichment analysis.

Charles A Tilford1, Nathan O Siemers.   

Abstract

Set enrichment analytical methods have become commonplace tools applied to the analysis and interpretation of biological data. The statistical techniques are used to identify categorical biases within lists of genes, proteins, or metabolites. The goal is to discover the shared functions or properties of the biological items represented within the lists. Application of these methods can provide great biological insight, including the discovery of participation in the same biological activity or pathway, shared interacting genes or regulators, common cellular compartmentalization, or association with disease. The methods require ordered or unordered lists of biological items as input, understanding of the reference set from which the lists were selected, categorical classifiers describing the items, and a statistical algorithm to assess bias of each classifier. Due to the complexity of most algorithms and the number of calculations performed, computer software is almost always used for execution of the algorithm, as well as for presentation of the results. This chapter will provide an overview of the statistical methods used to perform an enrichment analysis. Guidelines for assembly of the requisite information will be presented, with a focus on careful definition of the sets used by the statistical algorithms. The need for multiple test correction when working with large libraries of classifiers is emphasized, and we outline several options for performing the corrections. Finally, interpreting the results of such analysis will be discussed along with examples of recent research utilizing the techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19597782     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  31 in total

1.  Differential gene expression in the developing lateral geniculate nucleus and medial geniculate nucleus reveals novel roles for Zic4 and Foxp2 in visual and auditory pathway development.

Authors:  Sam Horng; Gabriel Kreiman; Charlene Ellsworth; Damon Page; Marissa Blank; Kathleen Millen; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Label-Free LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Identifies Protein/Pathway Alterations and Candidate Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Mahlon A Collins; Jiyan An; Brian L Hood; Thomas P Conrads; Robert P Bowser
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Identifying gnostic predictors of the vaccine response.

Authors:  W Nicholas Haining; Bali Pulendran
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 7.486

4.  Identification and Development of Subtypes with Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Based on Both Hypoxia and Immune Cell Infiltration.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Jingjing Sun; Yang Yang; Sonia Zebaze Dongmo; Yeben Qian; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-06

5.  IL-4 and CCR7 play an important role in the development of keloids in patients with a family history.

Authors:  Mengjie Shan; Hao Liu; Yan Hao; Tian Meng; Cheng Feng; Kexin Song; Youbin Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

6.  GenomicSuperSignature facilitates interpretation of RNA-seq experiments through robust, efficient comparison to public databases.

Authors:  Sehyun Oh; Ludwig Geistlinger; Marcel Ramos; Daniel Blankenberg; Marius van den Beek; Jaclyn N Taroni; Vincent J Carey; Casey S Greene; Levi Waldron; Sean Davis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 7.  Protein function in precision medicine: deep understanding with machine learning.

Authors:  Burkhard Rost; Predrag Radivojac; Yana Bromberg
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  An introduction to effective use of enrichment analysis software.

Authors:  Hannah Tipney; Lawrence Hunter
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.639

Review 9.  Beyond standard pipeline and p < 0.05 in pathway enrichment analyses.

Authors:  Wentian Li; Andrew Shih; Yun Freudenberg-Hua; Wen Fury; Yaning Yang
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 10.  Pathway-based analysis tools for complex diseases: a review.

Authors:  Lv Jin; Xiao-Yu Zuo; Wei-Yang Su; Xiao-Lei Zhao; Man-Qiong Yuan; Li-Zhen Han; Xiang Zhao; Ye-Da Chen; Shao-Qi Rao
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.