Literature DB >> 19597517

Expression profile of mRNAs encoding core circadian regulatory proteins in human subcutaneous adipose tissue: correlation with age and body mass index.

X Wu1, H Xie, G Yu, T Hebert, B C Goh, S R Smith, J M Gimble.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Circadian mechanisms underlie the physiology of mammals as an adaptation to the earth's rotation on its axis. Highly conserved core circadian regulatory proteins (CCRPs) maintain an oscillatory expression profile in the central and peripheral tissues. The CCRP include both a positive and negative arm, as well as downstream transcriptional regulators. Recent studies in murine models have determined that the mRNAs encoding the CCRP are present in multiple adipose tissue depots and exhibit a robust oscillatory expression profile. This study set out to examine the expression of CCRP mRNAs in human subcutaneous adipose tissues.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of total RNA isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue.
SUBJECTS: A total of 150 healthy female and male lean (body mass index (BMI) <25), overweight (BMI between 25 and 29.99) or obese (BMI >30) subjects of varied ethnic backgrounds undergoing elective liposuction or surgical procedures.
RESULTS: The expression of the CCRP mRNAs displayed a significant correlation between each other and mRNAs representative of adipogenic biomarkers. Hierarchical cluster analyses of mRNAs isolated from the cohort of female Caucasian subjects (n=116) identified three major clusters based on expression of downstream CCRP mRNAs. The mRNAs encoding D site of albumin promoter-binding protein (DBP), E4 promoter-binding protein 4 (E4BP4), PPARgamma coactivator-1beta (PGC-1beta) and Rev-erbalpha were negatively correlated with BMI in a lean cluster (n=66), positively correlated with BMI in a younger overweight/obese cluster (n=19), and not significantly correlated with BMI in an older, overweight/obese cluster (n=31).
CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm and extend findings that link the CCRP and circadian mechanisms to the risk of obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19597517      PMCID: PMC2743775          DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


Introduction

The earth’s rotation around the sun has impacted physiology in all organisms. As a consequence, there has evolved a highly conserved set of genes encoding core circadian regulatory proteins (CCRP(1, 2). Two of these proteins, brain muscle Arnt-like-1 (Bmal1) and circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (Clock) or its homolog, neural PAS domain protein 2 (Npas2), serve as the positive arm of the circadian pathway (1, 2). They heterodimerize and bind to conserved E-box cis elements in the promoters of downstream targets (1, 2). Among their many actions, Bmal1-Clock or Bmal1-Npas2 heterodimers activate transcription of their own negative regulators, cryptochrome (Cry) and period (Per), which heterodimerize and repress transcription of Bmal1 through a feedback mechanism (1, 2). This results in an oscillatory anti-phase expression profile between the positive and negative arms of the pathway that repeats every 24 hour cycle (1, 2). Additional downstream genes regulated by Bmal1-Clock include the transcription factors D site of albumin promoter binding protein (DBP), E4 promoter binding protein 4 (E4BP4), and the nuclear hormone receptor family members Rev-erb α and β and retinoid-like orphan receptor (ROR) α and γ (1, 2). For purposes of this manuscript, the following genes are encompassed by the term “CCRP”: (1) The positive arm genes encoding Bmal1, Clock, and Npas2; (2) The negative arm genes encoding Cry and Per isoforms; (3) The downstream targets DBP, E4BP4, Rev-erb and ROR isoforms. Furthermore, the genes encoding glycogen synthase kinase 3 β, responsible for the phosphorylation and proteasomal targeting of Per, and PPARγ2 Coactivator-1 (PGC1), which has been found to modulate circadian rhythms (3, 4), are included under the term “CCRP”. The CCRP have been linked to obesity, metabolism, and sleep disorders. Murine models homozygous for a mutated version of Clock displayed hyperphagia, hypertriglyceridemia, glucose intolerance, and a propensity towards obesity and the metabolic syndrome (5). Exposure to high fat diets has been observed to attenuate, phase advance, and/or disrupt the circadian rhythm in rodent models (6) (7, 8). Both Bmal1 and Clock have been linked functionally to glucose metabolism in murine models (9). Recent genotyping studies have identified Clock gene polymorphisms that are associated with an increased risk of obesity and metabolic syndrome in human population studies (10–13). Furthermore, murine strains with the Clock mutation or deficient in Bmal1, DBP, Npas2, or Per2 display abnormal sleep/wake cycles when deprived of photic stimuli as an entrainer (14, 15) (16–19). Consistent with this, polymorphisms in the human Clock and Period 3 gene are associated with sleep /wake preferences or disturbances (20–23). The importance of the CCRP genes in regulating sleep is of particular relevance. Pioneering clinical and epidemiological research by Van Cauter and others has demonstrated a direct association between human sleep patterns, glucose metabolism, and risk of obesity (24–30). Reduced length of sleep has been correlated with increased incidence of obesity at various points in human development (31–35). While the CCRP genes play a critical role within the body’s master circadian clock located within the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the brain (1), the genes have been detected in multiple peripheral tissues(36, 37). Their expression profile displays some degree of autonomy since circadian oscillations persist for several days in organs isolated from Per2 promoter/luciferase reporter transgenic mice in the absence of systemic synchronizing stimuli (37). The mRNAs encoding the CCRP have been found in multiple murine adipose depots and display a robust circadian oscillation in vivo (38–40). Similarly, Bmal1, Cry1, and Per2 have been detected in both subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue obtained from eight morbidly obese human males (41). In subcutaneous adipose tissue, these CCRP genes correlated with each other as well as parameters associated with the metabolic syndrome (41). Furthermore, in vitro studies have demonstrated that both mRNAs encoding CCRPs (42) and glucocorticoid-metabolic enzymes (43) can display an oscillatory expression profile in primary adipose-derived stem cell cultures and tissue explants, respectively. Based on these findings, the current study set out to examine the expression of a panel of CCRP mRNAs in subcutaneous adipose tissue obtained from healthy human subjects undergoing elective surgeries. The expression level of individual CCRP mRNAs has been analyzed relative to each other and to adipocyte-associated biomarkers and evaluated in the context of donor age and body mass index.

Materials, Subjects, and Methods

Human Subjects

All procedures and collections were performed under a research protocol reviewed and approved by the Pennington Biomedical Research Center Institutional Review Board in accordance with Helsinki Principles and HIPAA requirements. All research subjects provided their informed written consent prior to their surgery allowing the use of their tissue specimens for research purposes. Subcutaneous adipose tissue samples were obtained from otherwise healthy patients undergoing elective tumescent liposuction or bariatric surgery under the care of collaborating surgeons (see Acknowledgements). All subjects (n = 150) were healthy without a history of metabolic disease and displayed the following demographics: (1) mean age of 41.9 ± 10.7 years; (2) mean BMI of 26.9 ± 4.9; (3) ethnicity 81% Caucasian, 11% African American, 3% Asian, 3% Hispanic, 2% Not recorded; female 93%, male 7%. The majority of specimens contained subcutaneous adipose tissue from one or more of the following locations: abdomen (54%), flank (36%), lower extremity (29%), hip (15%), upper extremity (9%), breast/chest (5%), gluteus (1%). Samples were harvested between the hours of 8 AM to 2 PM, transferred to the research laboratory, and frozen at −80° C until processed for RNA recovery.

Quantitative Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was purified from human lipoaspirate tissues obtained from 151 subjects using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Approximately 2µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Reverse Transcriptase (MMLV-RT; Promega), with Oligo dT at 42°C for 1 hour in a 20µL reaction. Primers for genes of interest were identified using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) as previously described (42, 44). A complete list of primers used in these studies is listed in Supplement Table 1. qRT-PCR was performed on diluted cDNA samples with SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) using the 7900 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) under universal cycling conditions (95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec; then 60°C for 1 min). All results were normalized relative to the expression of β-Actin, β, and 18S RNA as expression controls.

Cluster Analysis

Without any assumption regarding the distributions of the raw data, we used hierarchical clustering method to segment the study population into N clusters on the basis of the samples’ age and BMI data (45). Four of 151 samples are automatically excluded from the procedure due the missing data. R-square value of each clustering is used as index to determine the number of clusters N. Within each cluster, we conducted the spearman’s rank correlation analysis to measure the relationship among the circadian genes. All analysis is performed in SAS v9.1 or JMP (SAS, Cary, NC). All values are expressed as the mean ± S.D.

Results

CCRP mRNA Expression and Correlation with Adipocyte Biomarkers

Subcutaneous adipose tissue was obtained from subjects undergoing elective surgery. Total mRNA was extracted from 151 male and female donors with a mean age of 41.7 ± 10.6 years (range 18 to 72) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.0 ± 4.9 (range 18.7 to 47.4) (Figure 1). The CCRP genes Bmal1, Clock, Cry1, DBP, E4BP4, Npas2, Rev-erbα, and Rev-erbβ were detected in adipose tissue. In the total population, the Cry1, DBP, Rev-erbα, Rev-erbβ, and RORα mRNAs displayed a highly significant positive correlation with each other while Npas2 correlated negatively with all genes except Bmal1, E4BP4, and RORα, where no significant correlation was observed (Figure 2). In contrast, the mRNAs encoding Clock, E4BP4, and RORα displayed a less significant correlation with each other and the related CCRP genes. With the exception of RORα, Bmal1 failed to display a significant correlation with any other CCRP mRNA. The correlation among the CCRP mRNAs in the subset of female Caucasian donors (n = 116) displayed a nearly identical pattern (Figure 3). In both groups, the majority of CCRP mRNAs positively correlated with all adipocyte biomarkers (aP2, C/EBPα, LPL, PPARγ2, PGC1β) with the exception of PGC1α, where a negative correlation was observed.
Figure 1

Scatter Plot of Body Mass Index (BMI) versus Age

The study cohort (n = 150) BMI (Y-axis) was evaluated relative to age (X-axis).

Figure 2

Direct Correlation Between CCRP and Adipogenic Genes in All Subjects

The correlation individual genes with each other and with age or BMI was determined in the entire study cohort (n = 150). Statistical significance based on t-test is displayed in varying shades of gray and black. Gene abbreviations are defined in Supplement Table 1.

Figure 3

Direct Correlation Between CCRP and Adipogenic Genes in Female Caucasian Subjects

The correlation individual genes with each other and with age or BMI was determined in the subset of Caucasian female subjects (n = 116). Statistical significance based on t-test is displayed in varying shades of gray and black. Gene abbreviations are defined in Supplement Table 1.

CCRP mRNA Correlation with Age and BMI

The individual CCRP and adipocyte biomarker mRNAs were correlated relative to each other in sectors of the total population subdivided based on BMI (Supplemental Table 1). Similar but not identical correlations among the CCRP and adipocyte mRNAs were observed in lean subjects (n = 56, BMI < 25), overweight (n = 59, 25< BMI < 30), and obese (n = 32, BMI > 30). To determine if a correlation exists between gene expression relative to age and BMI, the subset of Caucasian female donors (n = 116) were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis (Table 1). Three individual clusters were identified. Cluster 1 included 31 older (55.7 year) overweight/obese (BMI 29.1) individuals, Cluster 2 included 66 younger (40 year) lean (24.1 BMI) individuals, and Cluster 3 included 19 younger (30.5 year) overweight/obese (29.9 BMI). While age displayed a significant negative correlation with BMI in the older, overweight/obese subjects (Cluster 1), no significant correlation was noted for CCRP or adipocyte biomarker mRNAs relative to BMI. In contrast, age displayed a significant positive correlation with BMI in the leaner individuals (Cluster 2) and a trend, but not significance, towards this pattern in the younger, overweight/obese individuals (Cluster 3). A subset of CCRP genes (DBP, PGC1β, Rev-erb α) and adipocyte biomarker (PPARγ2) displayed a significant (p < 0.05) or near significant (p < 0.1) negative correlation with BMI in the lean Cluster 2 (Table 2). Furthermore, in Cluster 2, a near significant positive (0.416, p = 0.0965) and negative (−0.434, p = 0.0718) correlation was observed for DBP and Npas2, respectively, relative to age. In contrast, the CCRP (DBP, E4BP4, PGC1β, Rev-erbα) mRNAs displayed a significant or near significant positive correlation with BMI in the younger, overweight/obese Cluster 3.
Table 1

Age and BMI Dependence of Selected Human Adipose Tissue CCRP mRNAs in Caucasian Female Subjects

Cluster 1 (n = 31)Overweight/Obese,OlderCluster 2 (n = 66)Lean, YoungerCluster 3 (n = 19)Overweight/Obese,Younger
Age (± S.D.)55.7 ± 6.740.0 ± 6.130.5 ± 4.9
BMI (± S.D.)29.1 ± 4.824.1 ± 2.829.9 ± 3.8
Gene or Age BMI CorrelationP ValueBMI CorrelationP ValueBMI CorrelationP Value
Age−0.4690.00780.3780.00180.3510.141
DBP−0.0080.9678−0.2560.04470.4850.0483
Rev-Erbα−0.1140.5961−0.2550.06490.5880.0165
E4BP4−0.1110.5540−0.0710.5700.4160.0766
PGC1b0.3580.1325−.05120.07630.5830.0992
PPARγ2−0.2590.1662−0.2780.02310.2260.3515

Grey color: p value < 0.05.

Discussion

There has been a growing appreciation in the literature of the role circadian mechanisms play in adipose tissue biology, metabolism, and obesity (40, 46–48). The current study documents the expression of multiple CCRP mRNAs in human subcutaneous adipose tissue. The results confirm findings in rodent models (38–40) and confirm and extend the existing literature relating to CCRP gene expression in human adipose tissues (41). It is of note that mRNA expression profiles of Bmal1 and Npas2 display either an absent or negative correlation with the other CCRP mRNAs. This may be explained by the fact that both Bmal1 and Npas2, as components of the CCRP positive arm, are predicted to be out of phase with Cry, Per, and elements of the negative CCRP arm. The expression of the downstream components of the CCRP (DBP, E4BP4, Rev-erb, ROR) in positive correlation with Cry1 may reflect some degree of temporal synchrony in their profiles. This is consistent with observations in murine adipose depots, where the acrophase of Bmal1 and Npas2 were out of phase with Cry, Per, DBP, and Rev-erb mRNAs (39). Because the current study was performed with human adipose tissue obtained from individual donors at only one time point, the conclusions supported by this data are limited relative to in vivo murine studies (39). Further studies involving serial adipose tissue biopsies from a single donor will be necessary to define the relative expression profiles of the human CCRP mRNAs. Likewise, it remains to be determined if the human adipose tissue depot site (subcutaneous vs. visceral) significantly modulates the CCRP mRNA temporal expression profiles as previous studies have suggested (41) The current results indicate that the expression of a subset of CCRP genes is directly correlated to both subject age and BMI. The CCRP mRNA subset positively correlated with BMI in young, overweight/obese subjects (Cluster 3). This association was absent in an older cluster of nearly identical BMI (Cluster 3). This suggests that advancing age may attenuate or inhibit circadian mechanisms in adipose depots. In contrast, this subset of CCRP mRNAs negatively correlated with BMI in relatively young, lean subjects (Cluster 2). This non-linear correlation of CCRP mRNA expression levels with BMI in the younger individuals remains puzzling. It is well known that increased BMI alters the cellular composition of adipose tissue, reducing the frequency of adipose stem cells or pre-adipocytes while increasing the numbers of macrophages and large volume adipocytes. It is feasible that altered numbers of distinct cell lineages in the adipose tissue itself contributed to the current findings; however, this remains speculative and the subject merits further investigation. This subset of CCRP genes (DBP, E4BP4, Rev-erb α) are downstream of both the positive and negative arms of the core circadian oscillator where they act as transcriptional regulators, often with a repressor function. The E4BP4 factor, also known as nuclear factor IL-3 (NFIL-3), has been associated with the regulation of osteoblast differentiation (49, 50). This has potential implications in light of the multi-lineage differentiation potential of adipose-derived stem cells and the inverse relationship between the adipocyte and osteoblast pathways (51). The regulation of Rev-erb proteins has been linked to diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and obesity (47, 48). Recently, the Rev-erb α ligand has been identified as the iron containing heme moiety (52–55) which has long been known to enhance adipocyte differentiation in vitro (56). While PGC-1 was first described in the context of PPARγ function in adipose tissue and muscle (57), it has been identified additionally as a component of the circadian mechanism. Mice deficient in either PGC-1α or PGC-1β both display abnormalities in their circadian metabolic activities (3, 4). The significance of the divergent correlation between the subset of CCRP mRNAs in the younger lean and overweight/obese cohorts. Thus, expression of at least four CCRP transcripts correlate with age and/or BMI in human subcutaneous adipose tissue. In summary, human subcutaneous adipose tissue contained detectable levels of a subset of CCRP mRNAs. At least 4 of the downstream CCRP mRNAs were expressed as a function of subject age and BMI. While these CCRP mRNAs exhibited a negative correlation with BMI in lean, younger subjects, the correlation was positive in obese, younger subjects; however, in older, obese subjects, any significant correlation between CCRP mRNA levels and age was absent.
  56 in total

1.  Altered patterns of sleep and behavioral adaptability in NPAS2-deficient mice.

Authors:  Carol A Dudley; Claudia Erbel-Sieler; Sandi Jo Estill; Martin Reick; Paul Franken; SiNae Pitts; Steven L McKnight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Resetting mechanism of central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Hirota; Yoshitaka Fukada
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.931

3.  The transcription factor DBP affects circadian sleep consolidation and rhythmic EEG activity.

Authors:  P Franken; L Lopez-Molina; L Marcacci; U Schibler; M Tafti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The metabolic consequences of sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Kristen L Knutson; Karine Spiegel; Plamen Penev; Eve Van Cauter
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 11.609

5.  Photic and circadian expression of luciferase in mPeriod1-luc transgenic mice invivo.

Authors:  Lisa D Wilsbacher; Shin Yamazaki; Erik D Herzog; Eun-Joo Song; Laurel A Radcliffe; Michikazu Abe; Gene Block; Edward Spitznagel; Michael Menaker; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Parathyroid hormone induces E4bp4 messenger ribonucleic acid expression primarily through cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate signaling in osteoblasts.

Authors:  Ibrahim C Ozkurt; Flavia Q Pirih; Sotirios Tetradis
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 4.736

7.  Parathyroid hormone-induced E4BP4/NFIL3 down-regulates transcription in osteoblasts.

Authors:  Ibrahim C Ozkurt; Sotirios Tetradis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-05-12       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Hemin enhances the differentiation of mouse 3T3 cells to adipocytes.

Authors:  J J Chen; I M London
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Mammalian circadian biology: elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization.

Authors:  Phillip L Lowrey; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

10.  PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Yoo; Shin Yamazaki; Phillip L Lowrey; Kazuhiro Shimomura; Caroline H Ko; Ethan D Buhr; Sandra M Siepka; Hee-Kyung Hong; Won Jun Oh; Ook Joon Yoo; Michael Menaker; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Prospective influences of circadian clocks in adipose tissue and metabolism.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Gimble; Gregory M Sutton; Bruce A Bunnell; Andrey A Ptitsyn; Z Elizabeth Floyd
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Transcriptional repressor E4-binding protein 4 (E4BP4) regulates metabolic hormone fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) during circadian cycles and feeding.

Authors:  Xin Tong; Marina Muchnik; Zheng Chen; Manish Patel; Nan Wu; Shree Joshi; Liangyou Rui; Mitchell A Lazar; Lei Yin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Nuclear receptors linking circadian rhythms and cardiometabolic control.

Authors:  Hélène Duez; Bart Staels
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 4.  Age-Related Sleep Disruption and Reduction in the Circadian Rhythm of Urine Output: Contribution to Nocturia?

Authors:  Jeanne F Duffy; Karine Scheuermaier; Kevin R Loughlin
Journal:  Curr Aging Sci       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Circadian rhythms and metabolic syndrome: from experimental genetics to human disease.

Authors:  Eleonore Maury; Kathryn Moynihan Ramsey; Joseph Bass
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Circadian integration of metabolism and energetics.

Authors:  Joseph Bass; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Hepatic metabolic regulation by nuclear factor E4BP4.

Authors:  Zifeng Zhao; Lei Yin; Feihua Wu; Xin Tong
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.098

Review 8.  The role of circadian clocks in metabolic disease.

Authors:  Min-Dian Li; Chao-Min Li; Zhong Wang
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2012-09-25

9.  Rhythmic diurnal gene expression in human adipose tissue from individuals who are lean, overweight, and type 2 diabetic.

Authors:  Daniella T Otway; Simone Mäntele; Silvia Bretschneider; John Wright; Paul Trayhurn; Debra J Skene; M Denise Robertson; Jonathan D Johnston
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Disrupting rhythms: diet-induced obesity impairs diurnal rhythms in metabolic tissues.

Authors:  Lisa Wu; Akhilesh B Reddy
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.