Debora Goetz Goldberg1, Anton J Kuzel. 1. Departments of Family Medicine and Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. goetzdc@vcu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a widely accepted theory of a practice model to improve quality of care, patient satisfaction, and access to primary care services. This study explores existing elements of the PCMH and characteristics of family practices in Virginia. METHOD: We developed and administered a survey questionnaire to capture information on practice characteristics and PCMH elements. We randomly sampled 700 family medicine offices in Virginia from a population of practices derived from the Virginia Board of Medicine Practitioner Information Database. We used a mixed-mode survey, allowing practices in the sample to respond by mail or Internet or at a regional family medicine conference. RESULTS: The survey resulted in a response rate of 56%, with 342 office locations participating in the study. Most practices reported continuity-of-care processes (87%) and clinical guidelines (77%). Fewer reported use of patient surveys (48%), electronic medical record for internal coordination (38%), community linkages for care (31%), and clinical performance measurement (28%). A small number reported patient registries for multiple diseases (19%). Very few practices exhibited all elements outlined in the PCMH model (1%). Practice size (number of physicians) is significantly related to PCMH model alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Most family practices in Virginia exhibit some elements of the PCMH model. Full implementation of the PCMH model is low. Baseline information on practice characteristics, prevalence of PCMH, and challenges of small practices should be considered in guiding efforts, evaluating progress, and developing policies for care model reform.
PURPOSE: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a widely accepted theory of a practice model to improve quality of care, patient satisfaction, and access to primary care services. This study explores existing elements of the PCMH and characteristics of family practices in Virginia. METHOD: We developed and administered a survey questionnaire to capture information on practice characteristics and PCMH elements. We randomly sampled 700 family medicine offices in Virginia from a population of practices derived from the Virginia Board of Medicine Practitioner Information Database. We used a mixed-mode survey, allowing practices in the sample to respond by mail or Internet or at a regional family medicine conference. RESULTS: The survey resulted in a response rate of 56%, with 342 office locations participating in the study. Most practices reported continuity-of-care processes (87%) and clinical guidelines (77%). Fewer reported use of patient surveys (48%), electronic medical record for internal coordination (38%), community linkages for care (31%), and clinical performance measurement (28%). A small number reported patient registries for multiple diseases (19%). Very few practices exhibited all elements outlined in the PCMH model (1%). Practice size (number of physicians) is significantly related to PCMH model alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Most family practices in Virginia exhibit some elements of the PCMH model. Full implementation of the PCMH model is low. Baseline information on practice characteristics, prevalence of PCMH, and challenges of small practices should be considered in guiding efforts, evaluating progress, and developing policies for care model reform.
Authors: Diane R Rittenhouse; Lawrence P Casalino; Robin R Gillies; Stephen M Shortell; Bernard Lau Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Mark W Friedberg; Dana G Safran; Kathryn L Coltin; Marguerite Dresser; Eric C Schneider Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Elizabeth E Stewart; Carlos Roberto Jaén Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jonathan M Birnberg; Melinda L Drum; Elbert S Huang; Lawrence P Casalino; Sarah E Lewis; Anusha M Vable; Hui Tang; Michael T Quinn; Deborah L Burnet; Thomas Summerfelt; Marshall H Chin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Debora Goetz Goldberg; Stephen S Mick; Anton J Kuzel; Lisa Bo Feng; Linda E Love Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Marc Ringel; Christin Sutter; Kelly McCaffrey; Susan Gale; Tony Gerk; Sergio Sanchez; William LeBlanc; L Miriam Dickinson; Perry Dickinson Journal: London J Prim Care (Abingdon) Date: 2014
Authors: Michael L Paustian; Jeffrey A Alexander; Darline K El Reda; Chris G Wise; Lee A Green; Michael D Fetters Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Joseph S Zickafoose; Sarah J Clark; Joseph W Sakshaug; Lena M Chen; John M Hollingsworth Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kurt C Stange; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Carlos R Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Susan A Flocke; James M Gill Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 5.128