Literature DB >> 19597041

Validating the Framingham Hypertension Risk Score: results from the Whitehall II study.

Mika Kivimäki1, G David Batty, Archana Singh-Manoux, Jane E Ferrie, Adam G Tabak, Markus Jokela, Michael G Marmot, George Davey Smith, Martin J Shipley.   

Abstract

A promising hypertension risk prediction score using data from the US Framingham Offspring Study has been developed, but this score has not been tested in other cohorts. We examined the predictive performance of the Framingham hypertension risk score in a European population, the Whitehall II Study. Participants were 6704 London-based civil servants aged 35 to 68 years, 31% women, free from prevalent hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and coronary heart disease. Standard clinical examinations of blood pressure, weight and height, current cigarette smoking, and parental history of hypertension were undertaken every 5 years for a total of 4 times. We recorded a total of 2043 incident (new-onset) cases of hypertension in three 5-year baseline follow-up data cycles. Both discrimination (C statistic: 0.80) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi(2): 11.5) of the Framingham hypertension risk score were good. Agreement between the predicted and observed hypertension incidences was excellent across the risk score distribution. The overall predicted:observed ratio was 1.08, slightly better among individuals >50 years of age (0.99 in men and 1.02 in women) than in younger participants (1.16 in men and 1.18 in women). Reclassification with a modified score on the basis of our study population did not improve the prediction (net reclassification improvement: -0.5%; 95% CI: -2.5% to 1.5%). These data suggest that the Framingham hypertension risk score provides a valid tool with which to estimate near-term risk of developing hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19597041      PMCID: PMC2828464          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.132373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  20 in total

1.  Algorithms for converting random-zero to automated oscillometric blood pressure values, and vice versa.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Susanne Moebus; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Nico Dragano; Axel Schmermund; Eva-Maria Beck; Johannes Siegrist; Raimund Erbel; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Less atherosclerosis and lower blood pressure for a meaningful life perspective with more brain.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Tom Richart; Willem H Birkenhäger
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Comparison with mercury instrument is illogical.

Authors:  H W Hense
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-28

5.  Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn?

Authors:  R M Conroy; E O'Brien; K O'Malley; N Atkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-15

6.  Long-term effects of weight loss and dietary sodium reduction on incidence of hypertension.

Authors:  J He; P K Whelton; L J Appel; J Charleston; M J Klag
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents.

Authors:  H Tunstall-Pedoe; K Kuulasmaa; P Amouyel; D Arveiler; A M Rajakangas; A Pajak
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Essential hypertension.

Authors:  Franz H Messerli; Bryan Williams; Eberhard Ritz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  40 in total

1.  Development of a risk prediction model for incident hypertension in a working-age Japanese male population.

Authors:  Toshiaki Otsuka; Yuko Kachi; Hirotaka Takada; Katsuhito Kato; Eitaro Kodani; Chikao Ibuki; Yoshiki Kusama; Tomoyuki Kawada
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  The Framingham risk score underestimates the risk of cardiovascular events in the HER2-positive breast cancer population.

Authors:  W Law; C Johnson; M Rushton; S Dent
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  The Framingham risk score is valuable in Europeans.

Authors:  Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Prediction model and assessment of probability of incident hypertension: the Rural Chinese Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bingyuan Wang; Yu Liu; Xizhuo Sun; Zhaoxia Yin; Honghui Li; Yongcheng Ren; Yang Zhao; Ruiyuan Zhang; Ming Zhang; Dongsheng Hu
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 5.  Future Direction for Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict and Manage Hypertension.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Andrew S Bomback; Usman Baber; Sripal Bangalore; Franz H Messerli; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  A non-exercise testing method for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness: associations with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a pooled analysis of eight population-based cohorts.

Authors:  Emmanuel Stamatakis; Mark Hamer; Gary O'Donovan; George David Batty; Mika Kivimaki
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  A risk score for risk factors: rationale and roadmap for preventing hypertension.

Authors:  Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Evaluating the Framingham hypertension risk prediction model in young adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

Authors:  April P Carson; Cora E Lewis; David R Jacobs; Carmen A Peralta; Lyn M Steffen; Julie K Bower; Sharina D Person; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Blood pressure tracking over the adult life course: patterns and correlates in the Framingham heart study.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Vanessa Xanthakis; Lisa M Sullivan; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Incident hypertension and its prediction model in a prospective northern urban Han Chinese cohort study.

Authors:  Y Chen; C Wang; Y Liu; Z Yuan; W Zhang; X Li; Y Yang; X Sun; F Xue; C Zhang
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.