Literature DB >> 19596929

Chemotherapy response evaluation in metastatic colorectal cancer with FDG PET/CT and CT scans.

J Monteil1, N Mahmoudi, S Leobon, P Y Roudaut, A El Badaoui, S Verbeke, L Venat-Bouvet, J Martin, V Le Brun-Ly, S Lavau-Denes, A Maubon, P Bouillet, M Pouquet, J C Vandroux, N Tubiana-Mathieu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose with positron-emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans were used to assess morphological and metabolic tumour response after chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were evaluated after 4 courses of chemotherapy (+/-target therapy), and among them 20 patients after 2 courses. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and European Organisazion for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria were used to evaluate CT and PET respectively.
RESULTS: Discrepancies between the two procedures were noted after 4 courses of chemotherapy in patient-based analysis. Two morphologically complete responses (CR) were correlated with metabolic response. Seven morphological partial responses (PR) were evaluated as 3 metabolic PR, 2 CR and 1 progressive disease (PD). Seventeen cases of morphologically stable disease (SD) were evaluated as 3 metabolic CR, 13 PR and 1 PD. These discrepancies were confirmed in lesion-based analysis. Perfect concordance was noted between metabolic responses obtained after 2 and 4 cycles.
CONCLUSION: Morphological and metabolic imaging does not permit concordant therapeutic assessment in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  10 in total

1.  [Importance of PET/CT for imaging of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  F G Meinel; N Schramm; A R Haug; A Graser; M F Reiser; C Rist
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jingjie Shang; Xueying Ling; Linyue Zhang; Yongjin Tang; Zeyu Xiao; Yong Cheng; Bin Guo; Jian Gong; Li Huang; Hao Xu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Current approaches and challenges for monitoring treatment response in colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth McKeown; Daniel W Nelson; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Alexander Stojadinovic; Aviram Nissan; Itzhak Avital; Björn Ldm Brücher; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Fas signaling promotes chemoresistance in gastrointestinal cancer by up-regulating P-glycoprotein.

Authors:  Haoxuan Zheng; Zhizhong Liu; Tao Liu; Yidong Cai; Yadong Wang; Shiyong Lin; Jinmin Chen; Jing Wang; Zhiqing Wang; Bo Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-11-15

5.  Long-term outcomes and recurrence pattern of 18F-FDG PET-CT complete metabolic response in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a lesion-based and patient-based analysis.

Authors:  Keith W H Chiu; Ka-On Lam; H An; Gavin T C Cheung; Johnny K S Lau; Tim-Shing Choy; Victor H F Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Reliability of Contrast CT and Positron Emission Tomography in Post-Surgical Colorectal Cancer and Its Association with Obesity.

Authors:  Safenaz Y El Sherity; Shymaa A Shalaby; Nayera E Hassan; Sahar A El-Masry; Rokia A El-Banna
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-27

7.  Identifying an early indicator of drug efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-a prospective evaluation of circulating tumor cells, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography and the RECIST criteria.

Authors:  B Ma; A D King; L Leung; K Wang; A Poon; W M Ho; F Mo; C M L Chan; A T C Chan; S C C Wong
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  CT versus FDG-PET/CT response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.

Authors:  Kristin Skougaard; Helle Hjorth Johannesen; Dorte Nielsen; Jakob Vasehus Schou; Benny Vittrup Jensen; Estrid V S Høgdall; Helle Westergren Hendel
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Early 18F-FDG PET/CT Evaluation Shows Heterogeneous Metabolic Responses to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Erik J van Helden; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; Chantal Roth; Emma R Mulder; Henk M W Verheul; C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prospective evaluation of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA clearance and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission scan in assessing early response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Brigette Ma; Edwin P Hui; Ann King; Sing F Leung; Michael Km Kam; Frankie Mo; Leung Li; Ki Wang; Herbert Loong; Ashley Wong; Charles Ml Chan; K C Allen Chan; S C Cesar Wong; Y M Dennis Lo; Anthony Tc Chan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.