Literature DB >> 19596874

Use of different inhibitory quotients to predict early virological response to tipranavir in antiretroviral-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Judit Morello1, Carmen De Mendoza, Vincent Soriano, Lourdes Anta, Gema González-Pardo, Angélica Corral, Francisco Blanco, Inmaculada Jiménez-Nácher, Juan González-Lahoz, Sonia Rodríguez-Novoa.   

Abstract

Information about the relationship between pharmacological parameters and an early virological response to tipranavir (TPV) is scarce. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who had received TPV as part of a salvage regimen were analyzed retrospectively. A virological response was defined as a decline in the HIV RNA level of > or = 1 log unit or to <50 copies/ml between weeks 4 and 12 of therapy. The virtual inhibitory quotient (vIQ) was calculated as the ratio of the TPV plasma trough concentration (C(trough))/virtual change in the 50% inhibitory concentration. Three genotypic inhibitory quotients (gIQs) were calculated by using different TPV resistance mutation scores (from the International AIDS Society-USA [IAS-USA], Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multidrug-Resistant Patients with Tipranavir [RESIST], and Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales [ANRS] trials). The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and likelihood ratios for a positive result (LHR+) and a negative result (LHR-) [LHR+ = sensitivity/(1-specificity); LHR- = (1-sensitivity)/specificity] were calculated. A total of 57 HIV-infected patients were analyzed. A virological response was achieved by 77% of the patients. TPV resistance mutations, TPV C(trough), vIQs, and gIQs were all significantly associated with a virological response. The vIQ had the best PPV and NPV (97% and 78%, respectively). The values of the LHR+ were 7.8 for vIQ, 3.4 for the RESIST gIQ, 3.3 for the IAS-USA gIQ, 3.1 for the ANRS gIQ, 2.2 for TPV C(trough), and 1.3 for the IAS-USA and RESIST scores. The values of LHR- were 0 for the RESIST score, 0.07 for vIQ, 0.09 for the IAS-USA score, 0.27 for the RESIST gIQ, 0.32 for the IAS-USA gIQ, 0.37 for the ANRS gIQ, and 0.48 for TPV C(trough). HIV-infected patients who initiate a salvage regimen based on TPV may benefit from baseline drug resistance testing and TPV plasma concentration determination, as vIQ is the best predictor of a virological response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596874      PMCID: PMC2764193          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00041-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

1.  The first positive: computing positive predictive value at the extremes.

Authors:  J E Smith; R L Winkler; D G Fryback
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis.

Authors:  Joachim E Fischer; Lucas M Bachmann; Roman Jaeschke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Quantification of tipranavir in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Giraud; Elisabeth Rey; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Gérard Pons; Vincent Jullien
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  Virological and pharmacological factors associated with virological response to salvage therapy after an 8-week of treatment interruption in a context of very advanced HIV disease (GigHAART ANRS 097).

Authors:  Constance Delaugerre; Gilles Peytavin; Stephanie Dominguez; Anne-Genevieve Marcelin; Claudine Duvivier; Karine Gourlain; Bahia Amellal; Mayeule Legrand; François Raffi; Dominique Costagliola; Christine Katlama; Vincent Calvez
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Likelihood ratios: a real improvement for clinical decision making?

Authors:  B Dujardin; J Van den Ende; A Van Gompel; J P Unger; P Van der Stuyft
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Virological and pharmacological parameters predicting the response to lopinavir-ritonavir in heavily protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Authors:  Anne-Geneviève Marcelin; Isabelle Cohen-Codar; Martin S King; Philippe Colson; Emmanuel Guillevic; Diane Descamps; Claire Lamotte; Véronique Schneider; Jacques Ritter; Michel Segondy; Hélène Peigue-Lafeuille; Laurence Morand-Joubert; Anne Schmuck; Annick Ruffault; Pierre Palmer; Marie-Laure Chaix; Vincent Mackiewicz; Véronique Brodard; Jacques Izopet; Jacqueline Cottalorda; Evelyne Kohli; Jean-Pierre Chauvin; Dale J Kempf; Gilles Peytavin; Vincent Calvez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The normalized inhibitory quotient of boosted protease inhibitors is predictive of viral load response in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected individuals.

Authors:  Alan Winston; Gill Hales; Janaki Amin; Erno van Schaick; David A Cooper; Sean Emery
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  Tipranavir-ritonavir genotypic resistance score in protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Authors:  Anne-Genevieve Marcelin; Bernard Masquelier; Diane Descamps; Jacques Izopet; Charlotte Charpentier; Chakib Alloui; Magali Bouvier-Alias; Anne Signori-Schmuck; Brigitte Montes; Marie-Laure Chaix; Corinne Amiel; Georges Dos Santos; Annick Ruffault; Francis Barin; Gilles Peytavin; Marc Lavignon; Philippe Flandre; Vincent Calvez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Genotypic inhibitory quotient as predictor of virological response to ritonavir-amprenavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Authors:  Anne-Geneviève Marcelin; Claire Lamotte; Constance Delaugerre; Nadine Ktorza; Hocine Ait Mohand; Raquel Cacace; Manuela Bonmarchand; Marc Wirden; Anne Simon; Philippe Bossi; François Bricaire; Dominique Costagliola; Christine Katlama; Gilles Peytavin; Vincent Calvez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of antiretroviral therapy in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Natella Y Rakhmanina
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Novel method to assess antiretroviral target trough concentrations using in vitro susceptibility data.

Authors:  Edward P Acosta; Kay L Limoli; Lan Trinh; Neil T Parkin; Jennifer R King; Jodi M Weidler; Ighovwerha Ofotokun; Christos J Petropoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.191

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.