Literature DB >> 19596873

AI-2/LuxS is involved in increased biofilm formation by Streptococcus intermedius in the presence of antibiotics.

Nibras A Ahmed1, Fernanda C Petersen, Anne A Scheie.   

Abstract

Bacteria utilize quorum-sensing communication to organize their behavior by monitoring the concentration of bacterial signals, referred to as autoinducers (AIs). The widespread detection of AI-2 signals and its enzymatic synthase (LuxS) in bacteria suggests that AI-2 is an inter- and intraspecies communication signal. We have previously shown that antibiotic susceptibility is affected by AI-2 signaling in Streptococcus anginosus. Since chronic infections involve persistent biofilms resilient to antibiotic treatment, we explored the role of AI-2/LuxS in Streptococcus intermedius biofilm formation and cell viability when the organism was exposed to sub-MICs of ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, or tetracycline. The S. intermedius wild type (WT) and its isogenic luxS mutant, strain SI006, were exposed to sub-MICs of ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, or tetracycline. Biofilms were formed on polystyrene discs in microtiter plates. To assess planktonic cell viability, the ATP microbial viability assay was performed and the numbers of CFU were determined. For complementation assays, the AI-2 precursor dihydroxy pentanedione (DPD) was used as a supplement for SI006. Relative luxS expression was quantified by real-time PCR. The sub-MICs of all three antibiotics increased biofilm formation in S. intermedius WT. However, biofilm formation by SI006 was either unaffected or reduced (P < or = 0.05). Bacterial viability tests of biofilm and planktonic cell cultures indicated that SI006 was more susceptible to antibiotics than the WT. DPD complemented the luxS mutant phenotype. Real-time PCR revealed modest yet significant changes in luxS expression in the presence of antibiotic concentrations that increased biofilm formation. In conclusion, in S. intermedius, AI-2/LuxS was involved in antibiotic susceptibility and increased biofilm formation at sub-MICs of antibiotic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596873      PMCID: PMC2764162          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00546-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

1.  Distribution and antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin in human soft tissues.

Authors:  M Brunner; U Hollenstein; S Delacher; D Jäger; R Schmid; E Lackner; A Georgopoulos; H G Eichler; M Müller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR.

Authors:  Michael W Pfaffl; Graham W Horgan; Leo Dempfle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm?

Authors:  Kimberly K Jefferson
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Antibiotic susceptibilities of genetically characterized Streptococcus milleri group strains.

Authors:  M Tracy; A Wanahita; Y Shuhatovich; E A Goldsmith; J E Clarridge; D M Musher
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus anginosus ("Streptococcus milleri group") are of different clinical importance and are not equally associated with abscess.

Authors:  J E Claridge; S Attorri; D M Musher; J Hebert; S Dunbar
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Penetration of beta-lactam antibiotics into cardiac vegetations, aorta and heart muscle in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: comparison of ceftazidime, cefuroxime and methicillin.

Authors:  A A McColm; D M Ryan
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Novel streptococcal-integration shuttle vectors for gene cloning and inactivation.

Authors:  L Tao; D J LeBlanc; J J Ferretti
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1992-10-12       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus anginosus (the Streptococcus milleri group): association with different body sites and clinical infections.

Authors:  R A Whiley; D Beighton; T G Winstanley; H Y Fraser; J M Hardie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Biofilm formation by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: modulation by quinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ceftazidime.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Bonaventura; Ilaria Spedicato; Domenico D'Antonio; Iole Robuffo; Raffaele Piccolomini
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to imipenem exhibit changes in global gene expression and beta-lactamase and alginate production.

Authors:  Niels Bagge; Martin Schuster; Morten Hentzer; Oana Ciofu; Michael Givskov; Everett Peter Greenberg; Niels Høiby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance.

Authors:  Paul E Kolenbrander; Robert J Palmer; Saravanan Periasamy; Nicholas S Jakubovics
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Antibiotic modulation of the plasminogen binding ability of viridans group streptococci.

Authors:  Cristina Teles; Andrew Smith; Sue Lang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Regulatory Mechanisms of the LuxS/AI-2 System and Bacterial Resistance.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Baobao Liu; Daniel Grenier; Li Yi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The LuxS-dependent quorum-sensing system regulates early biofilm formation by Streptococcus pneumoniae strain D39.

Authors:  Jorge E Vidal; Herbert P Ludewick; Rebekah M Kunkel; Dorothea Zähner; Keith P Klugman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Natural-Product Antibiotics: Cues for Modulating Bacterial Biofilm Formation.

Authors:  Loni Townsley; Elizabeth A Shank
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 6.  Antibiotics as signal molecules.

Authors:  Diego Romero; Matthew F Traxler; Daniel López; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 7.  Beyond conventional antibiotics - New directions for combination products to combat biofilm.

Authors:  Danir Fanisovich Bayramov; Jennifer Ann Neff
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Quorum-sensing systems LuxS/autoinducer 2 and Com regulate Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms in a bioreactor with living cultures of human respiratory cells.

Authors:  Jorge E Vidal; Kristen E Howery; Herbert P Ludewick; Porfirio Nava; Keith P Klugman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Concentrations of amoxicillin and clindamycin in teeth following a single dose of oral medication.

Authors:  Yvonne Schüssl; Klaus Pelz; Jürgen Kempf; Jörg-Elard Otten
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Perturbation of the indigenous rat oral microbiome by ciprofloxacin dosing.

Authors:  P Manrique; M O Freire; C Chen; H H Zadeh; M Young; P Suci
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.