Literature DB >> 19596853

Rapid purification and high sensitivity analysis of heparan sulfate from cells and tissues: toward glycomics profiling.

Scott E Guimond1, Tania M Puvirajesinghe, Mark A Skidmore, Ina Kalus, Thomas Dierks, Edwin A Yates, Jeremy E Turnbull.   

Abstract

Studies on glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans (PGs) have been hampered by difficulties in isolation and analysis by traditional methods that are laborious and lack sensitivity and throughput. Here we demonstrate a simple method for rapid isolation of proteoglycans (RIP) employing phenol/guanidine/chloroform reagent to purify heparan sulfate (HS) PGs quantitatively from various tissues and cells. We further show that this generic purification methodology, when applied in concert with a BODIPY fluorescent label, permits structural analyses on RIP-purified HS at approximately 1,000-fold higher sensitivity than standard UV detection methods and approximately 10-100-fold higher sensitivity than previous fluorescence detection methods. The utility of RIP-BODIPY methodology was demonstrated by rapid profiling of HS structural composition from small tissue samples, multiple mouse organs, and as little as a few thousand cultured cells. It was also used to generate novel insights into in vivo structural changes in HS from Sulf1 knock-out mice for the first time that differed significantly from previous observations limited to tissue culture experiments. RIP was also applied to purify HS for bioassay testing, exemplified by cell assays of fibroblast growth factor signaling activation; this generated data from 2-O-sulfotransferase knock-out mice and revealed an unexpected deficiency in fibroblast growth factor activation by HS from heterozygous mice. These data demonstrate that RIP will underpin emerging efforts to develop glycomics profiling strategies for HS and other glycosaminoglycans to explore their structure-function relationships in complex biological systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596853      PMCID: PMC2757973          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.032755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


Heparan sulfate (HS) is a member of the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) family of polysaccharides and is found on almost all cell types in metazoan organisms, attached to core proteins to form specialized glycoproteins called proteoglcans (PGs). It is critical in many biological processes (including embryonic development, homeostasis, and wound healing), and lack of HS is lethal in higher organisms such as mice (1, 2). HS is also involved in a variety of disease processes (such as tumor angiogenesis, pathogen adhesion, and neurodegeneration). It carries out these functions primarily by binding to many different proteins and regulating their functions (1, 3). Specific binding is in part determined by the variation in structure of the HS, primarily in the number and location of sulfate moieties (4, 5). There is now intense interest in identifying specific structural motifs within HS responsible for binding and regulation of particular proteins and in exploring the heparanome, the entire complements of HS structures expressed by cells and tissues (1, 3, 6). The study of HS biochemistry and its interactions with proteins (3, 4) necessitates the ability to purify and analyze HS from tissues and cells. However, current methods of purification (such as detergent and guanidium salt extraction followed by protease digestion or chloroform/methanol extraction), although good at purifying HS in large amounts from single sources, suffer several drawbacks. They are lengthy and laborious (involving complex extraction processes and multiple column chromatographic steps) and can also result in alteration of native structure, for example N-desulfation (7–10). To address these problems, our rationale was to devise a simple extraction and purification protocol that was both rapid and streamlined, minimizing transfers to reduce losses in yield and providing HS of sufficient purity for comparative structural and functional analysis. We observed that PGs partition exclusively in the aqueous phase in extractions performed with TRIzol® (a well known phenol/guanidine/chloroform reagent that is widely used to purify DNA and RNA from tissues) (11). This observation led us to develop a method for isolation of PGs, exemplified by HSPGs. Here we demonstrate a novel approach for the rapid isolation of proteoglycans (RIP) from most tissues and cell culture samples that is quick (from cell/tissue sample to ion exchange purification in ∼30 min), reduces loss of material (only one transfer before ion exchange step), and is readily scalable. Furthermore, when coupled to a recently developed method for highly sensitive fluorescent labeling of GAG saccharides with BODIPYTM hydrazide (12), RIP allows the structural profiling and bioassay of HS from less than a milligram of starting tissue or a few thousand cells.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Chloroform, DNase I, RNase, neuraminidase, chondroitin ABC lyase, sodium hydroxide, sodium borohydride, sodium chloride, Tris acetate, sodium acetate, calcium acetate, PBS, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, SDS, and DMSO were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK). TRIzol, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, RPMI 1640, fetal calf serum, l-glutamine, penicillin-G, streptomycin sulfate, and BODIPY were from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK). Recombinant murine interleukin-3 (IL-3) and recombinant human FGF-2 were from R&D Systems (Abingdon, UK); porcine intestinal mucosa heparin was from Celsus Laboratories; and DEAE-Sephacel and PD-10 columns were from GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK). Heparinases I, II, and III were from IBEX Technologies (Montreal, Canada); Pronase was from Roche Applied Science (Welwyn, UK); HPLC-grade water and methanol were from VWR International (Lutterworth, UK); and unsaturated heparin disaccharide standards were from Dextra Laboratories (Reading, UK). BaF3 cells expressing FGFR1c were generously provided by David Ornitz (Washington University, St. Louis, MO).

Tissues

Organs from normal adult female CD1 mice were obtained from the University of Liverpool Animal House. Sulf1 knock-out mice were generated as described previously (13, 22). For cerebella preparation, heterozygous littermates were intercrossed, and after genotyping, cerebella were dissected from newborns at postnatal day 6. Mouse brains from mice wild type, heterozygous, or null for 2-O-sulfotransferase (14) were a gift from Dr. Val Wilson, Edinburgh.

3T3 Cell Culture

Murine Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts (ATCC number CCL-92) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 4 mm l-glutamine, 10 units/ml penicillin G, and 10 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate. Cells were allowed to reach 10,000 cells/cm2 in 100-mm dishes, 25-mm dishes, and 24-well plates prior to extraction. Cell numbers were obtained by counting duplicate plates.

Extraction of HSPGs with TRIzol

The extraction of HSPGs is identical to the initial purification procedure for RNA. Briefly, wet tissue or cultured cells were homogenized in a tissue grinder or solubilized in the culture dish with 1 ml of TRIzol reagent/100 mg of tissue or 10-cm2 culture dish. Samples were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature and transferred to polypropylene tubes with the addition of 0.2 ml of chloroform/1 ml of original TRIzol reagent used. Tubes were shaken vigorously for 15 s and incubated a further 3 min at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged at ∼8,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. HSPGs are present in the upper, aqueous phase (Fig. 1). The aqueous phase was applied to a 0.1–1 ml DEAE column (∼0.1 ml of bed/ml sample) in a disposable mini-column. The column was washed with 10 volumes of PBS, pH 7.4 and 10 volumes of PBS (0.25 m NaCl), pH 7.4 and eluted with 10 volumes of PBS (2 m NaCl) pH 7.4. PBS (2 m NaCl) fractions were desalted on PD10 gel filtration columns and freeze dried (“crude” GAG fraction, see Fig. 1).
FIGURE 1.

RIP strategy for the isolation of HS from tissues and cells. Cells or animal tissues are subjected to homogenization in phenol/guanidine reagent, and PGs partition into the aqueous phase after chloroform addition. This process is rapid (∼20 min) when compared with traditional methods (∼48 h). PGs are then partially purified using DEAE ion exchange chromatography and desalted, yielding crude GAG extract (∼2–3 h) suitable for initial structural analysis. Contaminating macromolecules are removed by single-pot sequential enzymatic digests, DEAE chromatography, desalting, and filtration. This yields a highly purified GAG sample (∼24 h) for use in bioassays and structural profiling. FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography.

Additional HS Purification

Freeze-dried samples were reconstituted in 100 μl of HPLC-grade water and digested in a single tube by sequential addition and incubation at 37 °C with 2.5 milliunits of chondroitin ABC lyase (in 500 mm Tris acetate, pH 8.0; 4 h), 10 milliunits of neuraminidase (in 125 mm sodium acetate, pH 5.0; 4 h), and 2 mg/ml Pronase (in 500 mm Tris acetate, 50 mm calcium acetate; 16 h). Each enzyme and buffer (at 5× final concentrations) were added at one-fifth volume at each step. The mixture was then subjected to DEAE chromatography and desalting as described above. Finally, the samples were applied to Millipore Biomax centrifuge filters (5,000 nominal molecular weight limit, Millipore, Watford, UK) and centrifuged for 5 min at 5,000 rpm. The retentate (50 μl) was brought to 500 μl with HPLC-grade H2O and reapplied to the centrifuge filters. This process was repeated three times to ensure remove of salts and other low molecular weight contaminants. The final retentate (purified GAG fraction, see Fig. 1) was stored at −20 °C until use.

Disaccharide Analysis with UV Detection

Samples in 100 mm sodium acetate, 0.1 mm calcium acetate, pH 7.0, were digested by sequential addition at 37 °C of 2.5 milliunits of heparinase I (4 h) followed by 2.5 milliunits of heparinase III (4 h) and finally with 2.5 milliunits of heparinase II (16 h). Samples were then applied to a Propac PA-1 strong-anion exchange column (4.6 × 250 mm; Dionex, Leeds, UK) and eluted with a 0–1 m NaCl gradient over 45 min on a Dionex BioLC HPLC at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Disaccharides were identified with reference to authentic heparin unsaturated disaccharide standards.

Determination of HS Concentration

The amounts of HS present in samples was determined by digesting the purified HS to completion as described above for disaccharide analysis. The molar concentration of the disaccharides present in solution was determined at A232 using the Beer-Lambert law with an extinction coefficient of 5,500 mol−1 cm−1 for the unsaturated bond chromophore generated by heparinase enzymes.

BODIPY Hydrazide Labeling and HPLC Analysis with Fluorescence Detection

Disaccharides obtained as for UV detection were labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, as described previously (12). Briefly, lyophilized samples were suspended in BODIPY fluorescent label hydrazide (5 mg/ml in methanol;10 μl). Methanol was removed by centrifugation under vacuum, and samples were resuspended in DMSO:ethanoic acid (17:3 v/v; 10 μl) prior to incubation for 4 h at room temperature in the dark. Labeled samples were reduced using sodium borohydride (1 m, aqueous; 10 μl) and incubated for 30 min (room temperature) prior to flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen and lyophilization. The fluorescently labeled disaccharides were resuspended in DMSO:H2O (50:50 v/v, 1 ml) prior to loading onto a Propac PA-1 column as above, eluted using a linear gradient of 0–1 m sodium chloride (in 150 mm NaOH) over 30 min at a flow rate of 2 ml/min on a Shimadzu HPLC system. Peaks were detected using inline fluorescence detection at excitation wavelength of λ = 488 nm and an emission wavelength of λ = 520 nm using a Shimadzu RF-551 detector. The column was reconditioned by washing with 2 m NaCl (in 300 mm NaOH) before equilibrating in 150 mm NaOH. Previously calculated correction factors were applied to quantitate the observed disaccharides (12).

BaF3 Assay

BaF3 cells (naturally devoid of HS and FGF receptors) transfected with FGFR1c were maintained as described previously (15). For proliferation assays, 10,000 cells/well were plated on a 96-well plate with culture medium (100 μl, RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mm l-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin-G, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate without IL-3) and were incubated with 2 ng/ml IL-3 or 1 nm FGF-2 with and without heparin/HS at the concentrations indicated. After 72 h at 37 °C, 250 μg/ml 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide was added, and the cells were incubated a further 4 h at 37 °C. Following solubilization in 10% SDS, 0.01 n HCl, the plates were read on a Multiscan EX spectrophotometric plate reader (Thermo Electron, Basingstoke, UK) at 570 nm. Increase in absorbance is proportional to cell number.

RESULTS

Rapid Method for HSPG Extraction and Purification

To streamline purification of HS from tissues and cell culture, we examined the benefits of a strategy exploiting phenol/guanidine/chloroform reagent (e.g. the commercial reagent TRIzol) (Fig. 1). We observed that GAGs (including HS) appear exclusively in the aqueous layer after phase separation. Following this initial isolation step, the HS is subjected to routine anion exchange chromatography on a mini-column and desalted, resulting (typically after ∼2 h) in a crude GAG preparation that can be used for initial structural analysis (Fig. 1). Further purification was achieved by sequential single-pot enzyme digestion and a second anion exchange/desalting procedure to remove unwanted GAGs and contaminating proteins. This results (after ∼24 h) in highly purified HS preparation suitable for detailed structural profiling and also bioassays (Fig. 1). RIP strategy for the isolation of HS from tissues and cells. Cells or animal tissues are subjected to homogenization in phenol/guanidine reagent, and PGs partition into the aqueous phase after chloroform addition. This process is rapid (∼20 min) when compared with traditional methods (∼48 h). PGs are then partially purified using DEAE ion exchange chromatography and desalted, yielding crude GAG extract (∼2–3 h) suitable for initial structural analysis. Contaminating macromolecules are removed by single-pot sequential enzymatic digests, DEAE chromatography, desalting, and filtration. This yields a highly purified GAG sample (∼24 h) for use in bioassays and structural profiling. FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography. A systematic approach was adopted to determine the efficacy of the RIP method in terms of recoveries (spiking experiments with 3H-labeled HSPGs) and maintenance of structural integrity. We examined the efficacy of the RIP method of purification in terms of yields. Initially 3H-labeled syndecan-1 was spiked into 100 mg of fresh mouse brain homogenate and HS purified by RIP. The amount of 3H label in the organic phase, interphase, and aqueous phase of the TRIzol extract was determined and showed that >95% of the spiked 3H-labeled HSPG was recovered in the aqueous phase (Fig. 2). Similar results were obtained by comparing yields of spiked samples from liver extracts (data not shown). It is well known that HS can be N-desulfated when exposed to low pH conditions (7–10). Because TRIzol has a pH of around 4.0, it was necessary to determine whether HS underwent any desulfation during the RIP procedure. Heparin, a highly sulfated variant of HS, was used as a proxy molecule in these control experiments and was subjected to RIP purification followed by 13C NMR analysis (10). The resulting NMR spectra confirmed that the purified heparin was identical to parental (untreated) heparin (data not shown), confirming that the procedure does not structurally modify these polysaccharides.
FIGURE 2.

3H-labeled syndecan-1 was spiked into 100 mg of fresh mouse brain homogenate and extracted in TRIzol. The organic, interphase, and aqueous phase were separated, and the amount of 3H in each was determined using a Wallac WinSpectra 1414 liquid scintillation counter and Optiphase HiSafe 3 scintillant (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Beaconsfield, UK). Data are expressed as the DPM in each phase (mean ± S.D., n = 3).

3H-labeled syndecan-1 was spiked into 100 mg of fresh mouse brain homogenate and extracted in TRIzol. The organic, interphase, and aqueous phase were separated, and the amount of 3H in each was determined using a Wallac WinSpectra 1414 liquid scintillation counter and Optiphase HiSafe 3 scintillant (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Beaconsfield, UK). Data are expressed as the DPM in each phase (mean ± S.D., n = 3).

Structural Profiling of HS from Tissues by Fluorescence Detection

We next exploited the RIP method by coupling it with a newly developed method for reducing end labeling of GAG saccharides with the fluorescent tag BODIPY hydrazide (12). With a detection limit of ∼100 fmol, this provides a >1,000-fold increase in sensitivity over the use of UV absorbance (A232, commonly used to detect the unsaturated non-reducing end bond produced by the action of the heparin lyase enzymes (16)) and a 10–100-fold increase in sensitivity over previous fluorescent labels (17–20). Fluorescence also has the advantage of minimizing background noise and non-glycan peaks, thus enhancing sensitivity. HS isolated from mouse kidney was subjected to exhaustive heparinase digestion, and the resulting disaccharides were labeled with BODIPY hydrazide and separated by high resolution strong anion exchange HPLC (Fig. 3a). The results show a typical chromatogram for HS, with a high proportion of unsulfated disaccharide (UA-GlcNAc) and smaller percentages of the other common disaccharides. Peaks eluting before 5 min represent free tag (Fig. 4); importantly, because no labeled saccharides co-elute with free tag, the samples do not require cleanup to remove this before analysis, thus streamlining analysis.
FIGURE 3.

Structural profiling of disaccharides derived from RIP-extracted tissue HS using fluorescence detection. HS was purified from differing amounts of mouse kidney by RIP, and disaccharide compositions were profiled using HPLC and BODIPY fluorescence detection. Representative profiles are shown for data obtained from 100 (a), 10 (b), and 1 mg (c) of starting material (analysis was performed on one-half of each sample). Elution positions of the eight commonly occurring disaccharides are indicated. d, quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles expressed as the percentage of total disaccharides (mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Disaccharide standards are as follows: standard 1, UA-GlcNAc; standard 2, UA-GlcNAc(6S); standard 3, UA-GlcNS; standard 4, UA-GlcNS(6S); standard 5, UA(2S)-GlcNS; standard 6, UA(2S)-GlcNS(6S); standard 7, UA(2S)-GlcNAc; standard 8, UA(2S)-GlcNAc(6S).

FIGURE 4.

Expanded chromatogram of BODIPY-labeled mouse kidney HS disaccharides showing early eluting free tag peaks. HS was purified from 1 mg of mouse kidney by RIP, digested with heparinases, and labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and the disaccharides were separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” HPLC analysis was performed on one-half of the extracted sample. Free tag elutes before 10 min under the wash conditions used and thus does not interfere with clear measurement of the disaccharides.

Structural profiling of disaccharides derived from RIP-extracted tissue HS using fluorescence detection. HS was purified from differing amounts of mouse kidney by RIP, and disaccharide compositions were profiled using HPLC and BODIPY fluorescence detection. Representative profiles are shown for data obtained from 100 (a), 10 (b), and 1 mg (c) of starting material (analysis was performed on one-half of each sample). Elution positions of the eight commonly occurring disaccharides are indicated. d, quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles expressed as the percentage of total disaccharides (mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Disaccharide standards are as follows: standard 1, UA-GlcNAc; standard 2, UA-GlcNAc(6S); standard 3, UA-GlcNS; standard 4, UA-GlcNS(6S); standard 5, UA(2S)-GlcNS; standard 6, UA(2S)-GlcNS(6S); standard 7, UA(2S)-GlcNAc; standard 8, UA(2S)-GlcNAc(6S). Expanded chromatogram of BODIPY-labeled mouse kidney HS disaccharides showing early eluting free tag peaks. HS was purified from 1 mg of mouse kidney by RIP, digested with heparinases, and labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and the disaccharides were separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” HPLC analysis was performed on one-half of the extracted sample. Free tag elutes before 10 min under the wash conditions used and thus does not interfere with clear measurement of the disaccharides. To determine the minimum amount of starting material required to obtain accurate structural data, we extracted HS from 100, 10, and 1 mg of mouse kidney (wet weight) and undertook comparative disaccharide analysis using BODIPY hydrazide (Fig. 3). All three samples gave comparable results, indicating the effectiveness and accuracy of the RIP-BODIPY method. The signal obtained from 500 μg of tissue was still above the detection limits, so it should in principle be possible to analyze smaller amounts. This confirms that minute quantities of tissue can be used for accurate structural profiling of HS. To demonstrate the profiling potential of this methodology, we repeated the RIP extraction and BODIPY structural analysis of a range of mouse organs (Fig. 5). Liver, lung, spleen, and heart were all analyzed and compared with the kidney, along with a comparison between fluorescence and standard UV detection (Fig. 6 and Table 1). Each tissue yielded a unique compositional profile, with heart and kidney being relatively low sulfated and liver and lung being more highly sulfated. Although the UV data were generally in very close agreement with that obtained by BODIPY detection, some differences in quantitation between these two modes of detection were noted (Table 1), as seen in previous studies (20). The data were also in broad agreement with previous tissue HS data obtained using standard purification and analysis techniques including UV detection or post-column fluorescence labeling (20–22). In addition, data on the disaccharide composition of porcine mucosal heparin obtained by BODIPY detection were comparable with that obtained by UV detection data and also literature values (data not shown). Taken together, this provides validation of the RIP-BODIPY methodology.
FIGURE 5.

Structural profiling of HS from different mouse tissues using RIP extraction and fluorescence detection. HS was purified from 100 mg of each tissue by RIP, digested with heparinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Representative data are shown for the tissues: a, liver; b, lung. Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3. c shows a quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles (data are expressed the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D., n = 5). Data from the full panel of tissues are provided in Fig. 6 and Table 1.

FIGURE 6.

Comparison of UV Bar charts of the data in Table 1 are shown. HS was purified by RIP from 100 mg of each tissue by RIP and digested with heparinases, and disaccharide composition was measured by HPLC with UV or fluorescence detection (in the latter case, after BODIPY hydrazide labeling) as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Quantitative comparisons of the compositional profiles are shown for kidney, liver, spleen, lung, and heart (data are expressed the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D., n = 5). Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3.

TABLE 1

Comparison of UV

HS was purified from 100 mg of starting material, digested with heparitinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and run on HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Data are expressed percentage of total disaccharide (mean +/− S.D., n = 5). It should be noted that the small differences in the amounts of specific disaccharides detected using BODIPY versus UV are likely related to small differences in the extinction coefficients of the non-reducing end double bond caused by differences in structure (39) In contrast, the BODIPY-labeled saccharides are quantitated with a correction factor for variations in reducing end-labeling efficiencies based on chemical quantities, based on studies with authentic disaccharide standards (12). UV data are also subject to variable differences in the accuracy of subtraction of background noise from peaks, particularly so in the case of minor peaks and where sample amounts are low. There are often high levels of contaminating buffer or sample peaks in the earlier parts of the chromatogram, combined with general baseline drift. This results in a tendency to overestimate the amounts of lower sulfated disaccharides and underestimate the amounts of the higher sulfated or low abundance disaccharides. Fluorescence chromatograms are generally much less susceptible to these effects. ND, not detected.

DisaccharideDetection methodKidneyLiverSpleenLungHeart
1 UA-GlcNAcUV56.33 (1.88)52.25 (2.33)56.33 (5.38)49.71 (2.54)61.19 (3.65)
Fluorescence52.07 (1.56)51.35 (1.03)56.58 (2.26)51.20 (5.63)57.23 (11.45)
2 UA-GlcNAc(6S)UV6.61 (0.85)4.86 (0.9)10.13 (0.97)10.96 (0.32)8.23 (0.84)
Fluorescence8.91 (0.27)3.96 (0.08)9.52 (9.52)11.48 (0.46)9.63 (0.29)
3 UA-GlcNSUV19.42 (3.55)18.19 (1.45)18.37 (1.77)20.45 (4.11)19.69 (1.35)
Fluorescence14.47 (0.43)18.11 (0.36)17.75 (3.55)21.15 (0.21)21.42 (3)
4 UA-GlcNS(6S)UV7.35 (0.13)7.01 (1.07)10.36 (0.21)2.41 (0.35)2.16 (0.72)
Fluorescence8.38 (0.17)6.84 (0.14)9.30 (0.09)1.20 (0.16)2.33 (0.09)
5 UA(2S)-GlcNSUV4.27 (0.13)6.73 (0.69)2.09 (0.1)9.94 (0.27)4.62 (0.22)
Fluorescence6.18 (0.19)5.67 (0.11)3.58 (2.18)9.83 (1.28)5.34 (1.07)
6 UA(2S)-GlcNS(6S)UV2.12 (0.41)8.05 (1.07)1.02 (0.93)3.06 (0.72)2.59 (0.61)
Fluorescence5.59 (0.56)11.41 (1.6)1.36 (0.12)3.33 (0.43)2.96 (0.06)
7 UA-2S-GlcNAcUV2.87 (0.76)1.79 (0.31)1.40 (0.76)3.47 (0.82)ND (0)
Fluorescence3.16 (0.73)1.05 (0.02)1.90 (2.43)1.81 (0.36)0.94 (0.09)
8 UA-2S-GlcNAc(6S)UV1.03 (0.24)1.12 (0.30)0.3 (0.05)ND (0)1.52 (0.35)
Fluorescence1.24 (0.50)1.61 (0.03)0.01 (0.01)ND (0)0.15 (0.02)
Structural profiling of HS from different mouse tissues using RIP extraction and fluorescence detection. HS was purified from 100 mg of each tissue by RIP, digested with heparinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Representative data are shown for the tissues: a, liver; b, lung. Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3. c shows a quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles (data are expressed the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D., n = 5). Data from the full panel of tissues are provided in Fig. 6 and Table 1. Comparison of UV Bar charts of the data in Table 1 are shown. HS was purified by RIP from 100 mg of each tissue by RIP and digested with heparinases, and disaccharide composition was measured by HPLC with UV or fluorescence detection (in the latter case, after BODIPY hydrazide labeling) as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Quantitative comparisons of the compositional profiles are shown for kidney, liver, spleen, lung, and heart (data are expressed the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D., n = 5). Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3. Comparison of UV HS was purified from 100 mg of starting material, digested with heparitinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and run on HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Data are expressed percentage of total disaccharide (mean +/− S.D., n = 5). It should be noted that the small differences in the amounts of specific disaccharides detected using BODIPY versus UV are likely related to small differences in the extinction coefficients of the non-reducing end double bond caused by differences in structure (39) In contrast, the BODIPY-labeled saccharides are quantitated with a correction factor for variations in reducing end-labeling efficiencies based on chemical quantities, based on studies with authentic disaccharide standards (12). UV data are also subject to variable differences in the accuracy of subtraction of background noise from peaks, particularly so in the case of minor peaks and where sample amounts are low. There are often high levels of contaminating buffer or sample peaks in the earlier parts of the chromatogram, combined with general baseline drift. This results in a tendency to overestimate the amounts of lower sulfated disaccharides and underestimate the amounts of the higher sulfated or low abundance disaccharides. Fluorescence chromatograms are generally much less susceptible to these effects. ND, not detected.

Structural Profiling of HS from Tissue Culture Cells by Fluorescence Detection

We next tested the application of the RIP method to cells grown in culture. HS was purified from Swiss 3T3 cells by RIP and analyzed by BODIPY labeling and strong anion exchange HPLC. HS purified from 3T3 cells grown in 100-mm dishes (250,000 cells), 35-mm dishes (40,000 cells), or 24-well plates (4,000 cells) produced comparable results, indicating that the methodology permits profiling from as little as a few thousand cells (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the HS from 3T3 cells has a higher proportion of di- and trisulfated disaccharides (standards 5, 6, and 8) than the mouse tissues (Fig. 6 and Table 1). These data demonstrate the utility of the methodology for profiling HS structures from small numbers of tissue culture cells.
FIGURE 7.

Structural profiling of HS extracted from Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. HS was purified from Swiss 3T3 cells by RIP, digested with heparinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The whole of each extracted sample was run, and representative data are shown for 250,000 cells (a); 40,000 cells (b); 4,000 cells (c). d shows a quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles (expressed as the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3.

Structural profiling of HS extracted from Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. HS was purified from Swiss 3T3 cells by RIP, digested with heparinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The whole of each extracted sample was run, and representative data are shown for 250,000 cells (a); 40,000 cells (b); 4,000 cells (c). d shows a quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles (expressed as the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3.

RIP-BODIPY Analysis of HS from Sulf1 Knock-out Mice

A major advantage of the new methodology is application in systems that have previously been intractable due to lack of sufficient sample, such as knock-out mouse models with altered HS molecular phenotypes, exemplified by the Sulf family of enzymes. These are glucosamine endosulfatases that remove 6-O-sulfates from HS in the extracellular environment (23). This activity is considered crucial for the proper regulation of several growth factors (24). Mice deficient in Sulf activity show a number of specific developmental defects, which become most obvious for the brain (25). A lack of Sulf activity would be expected to result in HS with more 6-O-sulfates than wild type mice. This has been observed in Sulf knock-out mouse embryonic fibroblasts grown in vitro (23, 26) but has not yet been studied in vivo. However, it is known that HS biosynthesis is dynamic and alters when cells are placed in culture conditions (27–29). This leaves open the question as to whether the in vitro data truly reflect the in vivo HS molecular phenotype in tissues where the Sulfs are known to be expressed in cell type- and developmental stage-specific patterns (23). To explore this issue, we analyzed individual cerebella (average weight 26.8 ± 4.3 mg) from postnatal day 6 Sulf1 knock-out mice, using the RIP-BODIPY methodology (Fig. 8). We found that the cerebellar HS from Sulf1 null mice displayed significantly higher proportions of each of the specific 6-O-sulfate-containing disaccharides (2, UA-GlcNAc(6S); 4, UA-GlcNS(6S); 6, UA(2S)-GlcNS(6S), and 8, UA(2S)-GlcNAc(6S)) than wild type littermates (Fig. 8c). However, the increase was most significant for disaccharides 6 and 8, and an increase in a non-6-O-sulfated disaccharide 5 (UA(2S)-GlcNS) was also notable. The RIP-BODIPY methodology was also used to demonstrate differences in HS structure between Sulf1 and Sulf2 knock-out mice. These data represent the first measurement of in vivo changes in the HS structural profile in these knock-out mice and demonstrate the potential for RIP-BODIPY to be used for glycomics profiling of HS in function-specific contexts in animal models.
FIGURE 8.

Increase in 6- HS was purified from single postnatal day 6 mouse cerebella from Sulf1 knock-out and wild type mice by RIP, digested with heparinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Representative data were obtained for Sulf1+/+ mice (a) and Sulf1−/− mice (b). c shows a quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles (expressed as the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3. Inset: expansion of the y axis showing detail of disaccharides 5–8.

Increase in 6- HS was purified from single postnatal day 6 mouse cerebella from Sulf1 knock-out and wild type mice by RIP, digested with heparinases, labeled with BODIPY hydrazide, and separated by HPLC as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Representative data were obtained for Sulf1+/+ mice (a) and Sulf1−/− mice (b). c shows a quantitative comparison of the compositional profiles (expressed as the percentage of total disaccharide; mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Disaccharide standards were as described in the legend for Fig. 3. Inset: expansion of the y axis showing detail of disaccharides 5–8.

Bioassay of HS Purified from Mouse Tissue by RIP

A further advantage of RIP is rapid purification of HS samples for bioassays. To demonstrate this, we studied mice with mutations in the HS biosynthetic enzyme 2-O-sulfotransferase (2OST); the null genotype results in early postnatal lethality due to lack of kidneys (14) and also defects in neural development (30). Embryonic mice fibroblasts lacking this enzyme activity have altered HS structure with essentially no 2-O-sulfation and a compensatory increase in 6-O- and N-sulfation (31). To explore the functional effects of these changes in HS structure, we purified HS by RIP from the brains of mice that were null, heterozygous, and wild type for the 2OST gene and tested the samples in HS-dependent bioassays of FGF signaling in HS-dependent BaF3 lymphoid cell lines (15). HS purified by RIP from wild type mice supported FGF-2 signaling via FGFR1 (Fig. 9); in marked contrast, HS from null mice lacked any ability to activate FGF2-FGFR1c signaling (Fig. 6), as predicted from the critical role of 2-O-sulfate groups in HS binding to FGF2 (32). Unexpectedly however, we also noted that HS from heterozygous mice also lacked activity (Fig. 9), revealing for the first time that gene dosage is critical for maintaining correct 2OST action in HS biosynthesis to create functional HS sequences for FGF2 signaling via FGFR1.
FIGURE 9.

Bioactivity of HS purified from brains of mice deficient in 2- BaF3 lymphoid cells expressing FGFR1c were incubated with 1 nm FGF-2 for 72 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of heparin or HS purified by RIP (from the brains of mice wild type, heterozygous, or null for 2-O-sulfotransferase activity). Proliferation was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures” (mean ± S.D.; n = 3).

Bioactivity of HS purified from brains of mice deficient in 2- BaF3 lymphoid cells expressing FGFR1c were incubated with 1 nm FGF-2 for 72 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of heparin or HS purified by RIP (from the brains of mice wild type, heterozygous, or null for 2-O-sulfotransferase activity). Proliferation was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures” (mean ± S.D.; n = 3).

DISCUSSION

Purification and analysis of specific structures from HS that relate to particular biological functions is a significant challenge yet remains a requirement to identify HS structures in cell culture and in vivo that have specific activities. Given the low abundance of specific structures and the pressing need for higher throughput glycomics studies, rapid scalable methods that minimize sample loss and are compatible with sensitive detection are now essential. Here we have described a new method for HS GAG purification, RIP (Fig. 1), which is compatible with many different types of tissue (Fig. 5) and cells (Fig. 7). Furthermore, using BODIPY labeling and fluorescence detection with a standard HPLC fluorometer provides a 10–100-fold increase in sensitivity (8) over previous fluorescent methods (10–13) and permits structural profiling data on HS to be generated with less than a milligram of starting material (Fig. 5) or as little as a few thousand cultured cells (Fig. 7). This means that new biological systems can be accessed for the first time. In addition, the streamlined nature of the protocol increases the number of samples that can be purified at one time, providing high throughput potential for the first time for these molecules. Data obtained are comparable with previously used standard methods (20–22). Interestingly, we have noted some differences in quantitation between UV and fluorescence detection, as noted previously by other investigators (20). Assuming careful experimental procedures and application of appropriate labeling correction factors, these differences may reflect more accurate measurement of compositional analysis by fluorescence detection due to less inherent susceptibility to sample contamination and background noise (see legend, Table 1). The latter are a significant limitation for UV detection, especially where only small amounts of sample are available. Here we demonstrated that purification of HS using RIP and subsequent disaccharide profiling with BODIPY detection allowed us to detect structural changes in HS from single postnatal cerebella of mice mutant in Sulf1 (Fig. 8). These changes suggest that Sulf1 normally removes 6-O-sulfates from all potential 6-O-sulfated disaccharides, but most notably, from trisulfated disaccharides (UA(2S)-GlcNS(6S)); interestingly, this action pattern of Sulf-1 differs significantly from that observed in fibroblast cells derived from Sulf-1 knock-out animals and cultured in vitro. In the latter case, an increase in all 6-O-sulfated disaccharides was also observed (23) but with far less pronounced effects than those observed here for the in vivo analysis of cerebellum tissue and in different relative ratios. This is likely due to altered biosynthesis induced by placing the cells in culture conditions (29) and emphasizes the importance of studying HS structures from in vivo tissues to accurately decode the true structure-function relationships of HS. The application of the RIP-BODIPY methodology was also exploited to compare HS from Sulf1 and Sulf2 knock-out mice; clear differences in the HS molecular phenotype were revealed that suggest divergent action of these enzymes in vivo.4 These data represent the first measurement of in vivo changes in the HS structural profile in these knock-out mice and demonstrate the potential for RIP-BODIPY to be used for glycomics profiling of HS in function-specific contexts in animal models. It should also prove possible to exploit and adapt the RIP-BODIPY methodology both for oligosaccharide mapping of HS domain structures (33) and for integral glycan sequencing (34), probably using HPLC (15) or capillary electrophoresis separation. Furthermore, the sensitivity of BODIPY detection can potentially be further increased (∼100–1,000-fold) using laser-induced fluorescence detection (35), allowing even smaller amounts of tissue or cells to be analyzed in the future. RIP purification does not alter the structure of the HS, and the HS that is purified can also be used in bioassays (Fig. 9), allowing structure-activity relationships to be explored directly and providing insights into the functional consequences of altered HS molecular phenotypes. Here we demonstrated differences in the bioactivity of HS from mice with variant genotypes for HS 2-O-sulfotransferase. Although HS from wild type mice activates FGF-2 signaling through FGFR1, HS from null mice cannot (Fig. 9), in agreement with previous data on FGF2 stimulation of embryonic fibroblasts from these mice (31). This is not unexpected because 2-O-sulfates have been shown to be important for the binding of FGF-2 to heparin (32). Surprisingly however, our new data revealed that HS from heterozygous mice was also unable to activate FGF-2 signaling, indicating the importance of gene dosage for correct 2OST action in HS biosynthesis (Fig. 6). Although HS from heterozygous mice has 2-O-sulfates, changes in the fine structure of HS are known to affect its biological activity and presumably underlie this lack of activity (15). Thus, RIP methodology provides an important additional tool for tackling the complexities of HS structure-activity relationships from in vivo tissue samples. In summary, the RIP method opens up new avenues for studying specific HS and other GAG structures present in cells or tissues despite their low abundance when coupled with high sensitivity techniques such as fluorescent labeling (12). The application of RIP should enhance development of glycomics approaches for GAGs (36, 37), including emerging mass spectrometry-based approaches (38), and will undoubtedly bring progress in uncovering the in vivo structure-function relationships of the heparanome (1, 3, 6) in complex biological systems.
  37 in total

1.  Variant heparan sulfates synthesized in developing mouse brain differentially regulate FGF signaling.

Authors:  Miriam Ford-Perriss; Scott E Guimond; Una Greferath; Magdalena Kita; Kay Grobe; Hiroko Habuchi; Koji Kimata; Jeffrey D Esko; Mark Murphy; Jeremy E Turnbull
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.313

2.  Electrophoretic sequencing of heparin/heparan sulfate oligosaccharides using a highly sensitive fluorescent end label.

Authors:  K J Drummond; E A Yates; J E Turnbull
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Fibroblast growth factor receptor signalling is dictated by specific heparan sulphate saccharides.

Authors:  S E Guimond; J E Turnbull
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-11-18       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The molecular phenotype of heparan sulfate in the Hs2st-/- mutant mouse.

Authors:  C L Merry; S L Bullock; D C Swan; A C Backen; M Lyon; R S Beddington; V A Wilson; J T Gallagher
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method with fluorometric detection for the determination of heparin and heparan sulfate in biological samples: application to human urinary heparan sulfate.

Authors:  H Toyoda; T Nagashima; R Hirata; T Toida; T Imanari
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  1997-12-19

6.  Laser-induced fluorescence as a powerful detection tool for capillary electrophoretic analysis of heparin/heparan sulfate disaccharides.

Authors:  Maria Militsopoulou; Céline Lecomte; Christopher Bayle; Francois Couderc; Nikos K Karamanos
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 7.  Heparan sulfate: decoding a dynamic multifunctional cell regulator.

Authors:  J Turnbull; A Powell; S Guimond
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 20.808

8.  Sulf loss influences N-, 2-O-, and 6-O-sulfation of multiple heparan sulfate proteoglycans and modulates fibroblast growth factor signaling.

Authors:  William C Lamanna; Marc-André Frese; Martina Balleininger; Thomas Dierks
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Redundant function of the heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatases Sulf1 and Sulf2 during skeletal development.

Authors:  Andreas Ratzka; Ina Kalus; Markus Moser; Thomas Dierks; Stefan Mundlos; Andrea Vortkamp
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 10.  The heparanome and regulation of cell function: structures, functions and challenges.

Authors:  Alessandro Ori; Mark Charles Wilkinson; David Garth Fernig
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-05-01
View more
  24 in total

1.  Analysis of axon guidance defects at the optic chiasm in heparan sulphate sulphotransferase compound mutant mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Conway; David J Price; Thomas Pratt; John O Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Proteoglycomics: recent progress and future challenges.

Authors:  Mellisa Ly; Tatiana N Laremore; Robert J Linhardt
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-08

Review 3.  Glycobiology and the growth plate: current concepts in multiple hereditary exostoses.

Authors:  Kevin B Jones
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 4.  Glycosaminoglycanomics: where we are.

Authors:  Sylvie Ricard-Blum; Frédérique Lisacek
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.916

5.  Disaccharide compositional analysis of heparan sulfate and heparin polysaccharides using UV or high-sensitivity fluorescence (BODIPY) detection.

Authors:  Mark A Skidmore; Scott E Guimond; Audrey F Dumax-Vorzet; Edwin A Yates; Jeremy E Turnbull
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Glycosaminoglycan characterization by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry including fourier transform mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tatiana N Laremore; Franklin E Leach; Kemal Solakyildirim; I Jonathan Amster; Robert J Linhardt
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Generating heparan sulfate saccharide libraries for glycomics applications.

Authors:  Andrew K Powell; Yassir A Ahmed; Edwin A Yates; Jeremy E Turnbull
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Genetic analysis of the heparan modification network in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Robert A Townley; Hannes E Bülow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Targeting heparin and heparan sulfate protein interactions.

Authors:  Ryan J Weiss; Jeffrey D Esko; Yitzhak Tor
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Mass spectral profiling of glycosaminoglycans from histological tissue surfaces.

Authors:  Chun Shao; Xiaofeng Shi; Joanna J Phillips; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.