Literature DB >> 19596690

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery.

S L Hetherington1, Z Adam, R Morley, M A de Belder, J A Hall, D F Muir, A G C Sutton, N Swanson, R A Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of emergency transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
DESIGN: Single-centre observational study with prospective data collection.
SETTING: A regional cardiac centre, United Kingdom. PATIENTS: 1051 consecutive patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, without cardiogenic shock, between November 2004 and October 2008.
INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral access MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were procedural success, major vascular complication and failed initial access strategy. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, needle-to-balloon times, contrast volume used, radiation dose absorbed and time to discharge. Multiple regression analysis was used to adjust for potential differences between the groups.
RESULTS: 571 patients underwent radial access and 480 femoral. A variable preference for radial access was observed among the lead operators (between 21% and 90%). Procedural success was similar between the radial and femoral groups, but major vascular complications were more frequent at the site of femoral access (0% radial versus 1.9% femoral, p = 0.001). Failure of the initial access strategy was more frequent in the radial group (7.7% versus 0.6%, p<0.001). Adjustment for other procedural and clinical predictors did not alter these findings. Needle-to-balloon time, as a measure of procedural efficiency, was equal for radial and femoral groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock, transradial primary angioplasty is safe, with comparable outcomes to a femoral approach and a lower risk of vascular complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596690     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.170233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  15 in total

1.  Successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery by transradial approach.

Authors:  Woo Taek Kim; Sung Gyun Ahn; Jun-Won Lee; Joong Kyung Sung; Seung Hwan Lee; Junghan Yoon
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  The Higher Cross-over Rate from Transradial to Transfemoral Coronary Angiography: Do we have the explanation?

Authors:  Mansour Sallam; Hafidh Al-Hadi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2010-07-19

3.  Effectiveness and safety of transradial artery access for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Schussler
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2011-07

Review 4.  The transradial approach. An increasingly used standard for coronary diagnosis and interventions.

Authors:  J Ludwig; S Achenbach; W G Daniel; M Arnold
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.

Authors:  Piotr Iwachow; Izabela Miechowicz; Piotr Kałmucki; Beata Dziki; Andrzej Szyszka; Artur Baszko; Tomasz Siminiak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Radial access protects from contrast media induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Thorsten Feldkamp; Maya Luedemann; Martina E Spehlmann; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Julia Gaensbacher; Kevin Schulte; Amer Bajrovic; Dieter Hinzmann; Hans-Joerg Hippe; Ulrich Kunzendorf; Norbert Frey; Mark Luedde
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Major Cardiovascular Outcomes for Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Ernesto Ruiz-Rodriguez; Ahmed Asfour; Georges Lolay; Khaled M Ziada; Ahmed K Abdel-Latif
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Impact of Center Experience on Patient Radiation Exposure During Transradial Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Intervention: A Patient-Level, International, Collaborative, Multi-Center Analysis.

Authors:  Trevor Simard; Benjamin Hibbert; Madhu K Natarajan; Mathew Mercuri; Simon L Hetherington; Robert Wright; Ronak Delewi; Jan J Piek; Ralf Lehmann; Zoltán Ruzsa; Helmut W Lange; Håkan Geijer; Michael Sandborg; Vinay Kansal; Jordan Bernick; Pietro Di Santo; Ali Pourdjabbar; F Daniel Ramirez; Benjamin J W Chow; Aun Yeong Chong; Marino Labinaz; Michel R Le May; Edward R O'Brien; George A Wells; Derek So
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Almanac 2011: Acute Coronary Syndromes. The National Society Journals Present Selected Research that has Driven Recent Advances in Clinical Cardiology.

Authors:  Charles Knight; Adam D Timmis
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2011

10.  Propofol to relieve radial artery spasm.

Authors:  Monish Raut; R R Mantri; Manish Sharma; Arun Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.