Purpose/ Objectives: To identify treatment, intrapersonal, and provider factors that influence childhood cancer survivors' adherence to recommended mammography screening.Design: Secondary analysis of data derived from three consecutive surveys within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.Sample: Female childhood cancer survivors: N = 335, X age = 30.92, X years after diagnosis = 21.79. Methods: T tests and structural equation modeling.Main Research Variables: Mammogram recency, health concerns, affect, motivation, and survivor-provider interaction.Findings: Forty-three percent of the variance was explained in mammogram recency. Survivors most likely to follow the recommended mammogram schedule were directly influenced by cancer treatment exposure to mantle radiation (p = 0.01), less intrinsic motivation (p = 0.01), positive affect (p = 0.05), recent visits to an oncology clinic (p = 0.01), discussion of subsequent cancer risks with a physician (p = 0.001), perceptions of more severe late effects (p = 0.05), age (40 years or older) (p </= 0.001), and a print media intervention detailing breast cancer risks and follow-up strategies.Conclusions: Perceived symptoms, motivation, affect, provider influences, readiness for medical follow-up, and knowledge of treatment exposures are potential modifiable targets for intervention to support mammography screening in childhood cancer survivors at risk.Implications for Nursing: (a) Provide written summaries of treatment exposures and recommended schedule of mammography screening at the end of cancer treatment and throughout follow-up; (b) identify and address survivor symptoms and concerns that may negate screening; and (c) enhance motivation for screening by tailoring personal risk information to health concerns, affect, and readiness for follow-up.
Purpose/ Objectives: To identify treatment, intrapersonal, and provider factors that influence childhood cancer survivors' adherence to recommended mammography screening.Design: Secondary analysis of data derived from three consecutive surveys within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.Sample: Female childhood cancer survivors: N = 335, X age = 30.92, X years after diagnosis = 21.79. Methods: T tests and structural equation modeling.Main Research Variables: Mammogram recency, health concerns, affect, motivation, and survivor-provider interaction.Findings: Forty-three percent of the variance was explained in mammogram recency. Survivors most likely to follow the recommended mammogram schedule were directly influenced by cancer treatment exposure to mantle radiation (p = 0.01), less intrinsic motivation (p = 0.01), positive affect (p = 0.05), recent visits to an oncology clinic (p = 0.01), discussion of subsequent cancer risks with a physician (p = 0.001), perceptions of more severe late effects (p = 0.05), age (40 years or older) (p </= 0.001), and a print media intervention detailing breast cancer risks and follow-up strategies.Conclusions: Perceived symptoms, motivation, affect, provider influences, readiness for medical follow-up, and knowledge of treatment exposures are potential modifiable targets for intervention to support mammography screening in childhood cancer survivors at risk.Implications for Nursing: (a) Provide written summaries of treatment exposures and recommended schedule of mammography screening at the end of cancer treatment and throughout follow-up; (b) identify and address survivor symptoms and concerns that may negate screening; and (c) enhance motivation for screening by tailoring personal risk information to health concerns, affect, and readiness for follow-up.
Authors: Cheryl L Cox; Rosemary A McLaughlin; Shesh N Rai; Brenda D Steen; Melissa M Hudson Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Amanda K Shaw; Lisa Pogany; Kathy N Speechley; Elizabeth Maunsell; Maru Barrera; Leslie S Mery Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Yutaka Yasui; Wendy Hobbie; Hegang Chen; James G Gurney; Mark Yeazel; Christopher J Recklitis; Neyssa Marina; Leslie R Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-24 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Michele Montgomery; Sujuan Huang; Cheryl L Cox; Wendy M Leisenring; Kevin C Oeffinger; Melissa M Hudson; Jill Ginsberg; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Kirsten K Ness Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Casey L Daniel; Connie L Kohler; Kayla L Stratton; Kevin C Oeffinger; Wendy M Leisenring; John W Waterbor; Kimberly F Whelan; Gregory T Armstrong; Tara O Henderson; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Paul C Nathan Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Deirdre A Caplin; Ken R Smith; Kirsten K Ness; Heidi A Hanson; Stephanie M Smith; Paul C Nathan; Melissa M Hudson; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Cheryl L Cox; Liang Zhu; Lorna Finnegan; Brenda D Steen; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-03-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: K Reynolds; M Spavor; Y Brandelli; C Kwok; Y Li; M Disciglio; L E Carlson; F Schulte; R Anderson; P Grundy; J Giese-Davis Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Cheryl L Cox; Liang Zhu; Melissa M Hudson; Brenda D Steen; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; John D Boice; Eric J Chow; Stella M Davies; Sarah S Donaldson; Daniel M Green; Sue Hammond; Anna T Meadows; Ann C Mertens; John J Mulvihill; Paul C Nathan; Joseph P Neglia; Roger J Packer; Preetha Rajaraman; Charles A Sklar; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K Zeltzer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Catherine Benedict; Jason Wang; Marina Reppucci; Charles L Schleien; Jonathan D Fish Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Debra L Friedman; John Whitton; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Sue Hammond; Marilyn Stovall; Sarah S Donaldson; Anna T Meadows; Leslie L Robison; Joseph P Neglia Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 11.816