Literature DB >> 19596626

Aesthetic and functional reduction of the labia minora using the Maas and Hage technique.

N S Solanki1, R Tejero-Trujeque, A Stevens-King, C M Malata.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Enlarged labia minora can cause functional, aesthetic and psychosocial problems. There are many reported techniques for their surgical correction in both the gynaecological and surgical literature suggesting that no one method is superior to the others. The problem is compounded because an individual surgeon's experience is likely to be small given the infrequent request for surgery. For these reasons it is important that existing techniques are validated by independent surgeons rather than describing yet another variation.
METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical reduction of their labia minora from 2001-2008 were retrospectively reviewed. All cases were performed by the same surgeon using the Maas and Hage technique of a running interdigitating W-shaped excision.
RESULTS: 12 patients aged from 15 to 52 years underwent reduction labioplasty for idiopathic hypertrophy. Postoperatively there were no wound dehiscences or infections. One patient developed a painful haematoma 2h after surgery necessitating surgical evacuation while another went into postoperative urinary retention relieved by overnight catheterisation. Both made uneventful recoveries. All patients were satisfied with their 'natural looking' cosmetic results and have returned to their normal activities without recurrence of their presenting symptoms. The mean follow up was 14 weeks but none have subsequently required or requested revisional surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The running W-shaped resection was found to be an easy and effective method of reducing the labia minora by a single operator in a small series of cases. This independent review demonstrates the reproducibility of this technique and the favourable aesthetic and functional outcomes for the patient. Copyright 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596626     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.05.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

Review 1.  Female genital cosmetic surgery: a review of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Ladin Yurteri-Kaplan; Red Alinsod
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the external genitalia.

Authors:  Raoul C M Hennekam; Judith E Allanson; Leslie G Biesecker; John C Carey; John M Opitz; Eric Vilain
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Individual male perception of female genitalia.

Authors:  Emma Horrocks; Jay Iyer; Althea Askern; Nadine Becuzzi; Venkat N Vangaveti; Ajay Rane
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The Butterfly Technique: A Retrospective Study for Labia Minora Reduction Using an Integrated Approach.

Authors:  Mathias Tremp; Carlo M Oranges; Dirk J Schaefer; Natascha J Waldkircher; Andrea C Schleh; Daniel F Kalbermatten
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-13

Review 5.  Cosmetic labiaplasty on minors: a review of current trends and evidence.

Authors:  Andreas Kalampalikis; Lina Michala
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 6.  The Safe Practice of Female Genital Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Heather J Furnas; Francisco L Canales; Rachel A Pedreira; Carly Comer; Samuel J Lin; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.