Literature DB >> 19596563

Methacholine challenge--comparison of an ATS protocol to a new rapid single concentration technique.

Johannes Schulze1, Martin Rosewich, Carsten Riemer, Melanie Dressler, Markus A Rose, Stefan Zielen.   

Abstract

Bronchial methacholine challenge is well established in asthma diagnostics and research. ATS guidelines propose a five step standard dosimeter (SDM) protocol with incremental concentrations of methacholine to calculate the concentration causing a 20% drop in FEV(1) in an individual (PC(20)FEV(1)). In contrast, the aerosol provocation system (APS) by Viasys automatically determines the administered dose of methacholine by measuring the effective nebulisation time and referring it to drug concentration and nebuliser power. Therefore, it offers a feasible and less time-consuming provocation procedure by applying incremental doses (PD(20)) of methacholine using a single concentration (16mg/mL methacholine, APS-SC). In this study we compared these two methods in 52 young adults (25+/-5.8 years). Following a screening visit, subjects were randomly assigned to undergo either SDM or APS-SC followed by the other method within 1 week. A close correlation between concentration and dosage causing a 20% fall of FEV(1) was found (r=0.69, p<0.001). Using the ATS categorisation of bronchial responsiveness we interpreted the results of the APS-SC method as follows: PD(20) methacholine<0.3mg as "moderate to severe BHR", 0.3 - 0.6mg as "mild BHR", 0.6 - 1.0mg as "borderline BHR", and>1.0mg as "normal bronchial response". We conclude that the five-step APS-SC is a suitable method, providing reliable results. In clinical practice the APS-SC is a timesaving procedure and less prone to errors since only one dilution of methacholine is necessary compared to the SDM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596563     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  6 in total

1.  Clinical assessment of speech correlates well with lung function during induced bronchoconstriction.

Authors:  Nicholas Tayler; Christopher Grainge; Kerry Gove; Peter Howarth; Judith Holloway
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.871

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge tests assessing airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic patients - a multifunctional approach.

Authors:  Richard Kraemer; Hans-Jürgen Smith; Thomas Sigrist; Gabi Giger; Roland Keller; Martin Frey
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  Characterization of a subgroup of non-type 2 asthma with cow's milk hypersensitivity in young subjects.

Authors:  N Tsolakis; L Nordvall; C Janson; N Rydell; A Malinovschi; K Alving
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.871

4.  Airway responses and inflammation in subjects with asthma after four days of repeated high-single-dose allergen challenge.

Authors:  Johannes Schulze; Sandra Voss; Ulrich Zissler; Markus A Rose; Stefan Zielen; Ralf Schubert
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2012-09-19

5.  Medical and pharmacological approach to adjust the salbutamol anti-doping policy in athletes.

Authors:  Fabien Pillard; Michel Lavit; Valérie Lauwers Cances; Jacques Rami; Georges Houin; Alain Didier; Daniel Rivière
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2015-12-24

6.  Diagnostic possibility of the combination of exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil count for eosinophilic asthma.

Authors:  Jiang-Hua Li; Rui Han; Yu-Bo Wang; Min Cheng; Heng-Yi Chen; Wen-Hui Lei; Li Li; Chen Gao; Na-Na Zhao; Nai-Fu Nie; Zhong-Yan Li; Guo-Qing Yin; Shuai Huang; Yong He
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.317

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.