| Literature DB >> 19595920 |
J Wesson Ashford1, Soo Borson, Ruth O'Hara, Paul Dash, Lori Frank, Philippe Robert, William R Shankle, Mary C Tierney, Henry Brodaty, Frederick A Schmitt, Helena C Kraemer, Herman Buschke, Howard Fillit.
Abstract
Multiple arguments for considering routine dementia screening have been presented. Furthermore, dementia diagnoses are widely unrecognized. As a result, persons with dementia are missing important clinical care and treatment interventions. By distinction, the problems of defining, diagnosing, and treating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are not yet resolved, and MCI is not ready for a screening recommendation. Dementia screening approaches, including cognitive testing and functional assessment, must be evaluated on their scientific merits, including sensitivity and specificity for recognizing affected individuals in at-risk populations. Screening tests must be "cost-worthy", with the benefits of true-positive test results justifying the costs of testing and resolving false-positive cases, with due consideration for proper diagnostic evaluation and potential harms. With the tremendous number of new cases projected in the near future and the expected emergence of beneficial therapies, considerably more research is needed to develop more efficient screening systems.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 19595920 PMCID: PMC2804947 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Dement ISSN: 1552-5260 Impact factor: 21.566