Literature DB >> 19595866

Utility of the telephone interview for cognitive status for enrollment in clinical trials.

Roy Yaari1, Adam S Fleisher, Anthony C Gamst, Victor P Bagwell, Leon J Thal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) assesses cognitive status via the telephone and has been used to recruit for clinical trials by screening for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). The utility of screening for aMCI has not been validated, and it is unknown which questions best predict aMCI.
METHODS: The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) used the TICS-m to recruit for an aMCI clinical trial. If telephone respondents screened positive for aMCI on the TICS-m, they were referred to a clinical site where they were assessed for the operational criteria of aMCI. Univariate analyses identified the TICS-m questions that best predicted aMCI, creating a final model using forward stepwise logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of 52,722 calls, 16,312 were screened for trial entry. Of these, 4,883 received the TICS-m. The 2,431 that screened positive for aMCI were referred to a clinic, and 527 arrived for clinical assessment. Of these, 266 met operational criteria for aMCI. The positive predictive value of the TICS-m in this population is 50.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.2% to 54.8%). The final model included 5 variables: (1) 10-word list delayed recall (p < 0.001), (2) day of month (p = 0.002), (3) season (p = 0.009), (4) last name of current president (p = 0.020), and (5) month (p = 0.036). This model has a predictive accuracy of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.71) which is similar to the entire TICS-m. The predictive accuracy of the 10-word list delayed recall alone was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.72).
CONCLUSION: The TICS-m is not optimally efficient for recruitment of subjects for aMCI clinical trials. The 10-word delayed recall has a predictive accuracy similar to that of the entire TICS-m.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 19595866     DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2006.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimers Dement        ISSN: 1552-5260            Impact factor:   21.566


  13 in total

1.  Validation of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and intact elders.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; William H Adams
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Correcting for demographic variables on the modified telephone interview for cognitive status.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; David Shprecher; Irene Litvan; Adam Gerstenecker; Benjamin Mast
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.105

3.  Telephone interview for cognitive status.

Authors:  Oscar L Lopez; Lewis H Kuller
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS) screening for clinical trials of physical activity and cognitive training: the seniors health and activity research program pilot (SHARP-P) study.

Authors:  Mark A Espeland; Stephen R Rapp; Jeff A Katula; Lee Ann Andrews; Deborah Felton; Sarah A Gaussoin; Dale Dagenbach; Claudine Legault; Janine M Jennings; Kaycee M Sink
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Telephone assessment of cognitive function in the late-onset Alzheimer's disease family study.

Authors:  Robert S Wilson; Sue E Leurgans; Tatiana M Foroud; Robert A Sweet; Neill Graff-Radford; Richard Mayeux; David A Bennett
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2010-07

6.  The Memory and Aging Telephone Screen: development and preliminary validation.

Authors:  Laura A Rabin; Andrew J Saykin; Heather A Wishart; Katherine E Nutter-Upham; Laura A Flashman; Nadia Pare; Robert B Santulli
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Differential memory test sensitivity for diagnosing amnestic mild cognitive impairment and predicting conversion to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Laura A Rabin; Nadia Paré; Andrew J Saykin; Michael J Brown; Heather A Wishart; Laura A Flashman; Robert B Santulli
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-04-07

8.  Demographic corrections for the modified telephone interview for cognitive status.

Authors:  Kathryn Dennett; Danielle Tometich; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS): Italian adaptation, psychometrics and diagnostics.

Authors:  Ildebrando Appollonio; Nadia Bolognini; Edoardo Nicolò Aiello; Antonella Esposito; Ilaria Giannone; Lorenzo Diana
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.830

Review 10.  Cognitive Assessment via Telephone: A Scoping Review of Instruments.

Authors:  Anne R Carlew; Hudaisa Fatima; Julia R Livingstone; Caitlin Reese; Laura Lacritz; Cody Pendergrass; Kenneth Chase Bailey; Chase Presley; Ben Mokhtari; Colin Munro Cullum
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.