Literature DB >> 19595545

The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients.

Ali F AbuRahma1, John Campbell, Patrick A Stone, Aravinda Nanjundappa, Akhilesh Jain, L Scott Dean, Joseph Habib, Tammi Keiffer, Mary Emmett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initially, patients with a short angulated aortic neck were considered unfit for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Recently, however, more liberal use of EVAR has been advocated. This study analyzes the correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes.
METHODS: We analyzed 238 patients who underwent EVAR during a recent 7-year period. All patients were followed up clinically and underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound imaging or computed tomography angiography, which were repeated every 6 months. Aortic neck length was classified into >or=15 mm (L1, n = 195), 10 to <15 mm (L2, n = 24), and <10 mm (L3, n = 17). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate freedom from late endoleak, early and late reintervention, and survival.
RESULTS: Analyzed were 49 Ancure, 47 AneuRx, 104 Excluder, and 38 Zenith grafts. The mean follow-up was 24.7 months (range, 1-87 months). The initial technical success was 99%. The perioperative complication rates for groups L1, L2, and L3 were 13%, 21%, and 24%, respectively (P = .289). Proximal type I early endoleaks occurred in 12%, 42%, and 53% in groups L1, L2, and L3, respectively (P < .001). Intraoperative proximal aortic cuffs were needed to seal proximal type I endoleaks in 10%, 38%, and 47% in L1, L2, and L3 groups, respectively (P < .0001). However, the rate of late reintervention was comparable in all groups. Postoperatively, the size of the abdominal aortic aneurysm decreased or remained unchanged in 95%, 94%, and 88% in L1, L2, and L3, respectively (P = .660). Rates of freedom from late type I endoleak at 1, 2, and 3 years were 84%, 82%, and 80% for L1; 68%, 54%, and 54% for L2; and 71%, 71%, and 53% for L3 (P = .0263). Rates of freedom from late intervention at 1, 2, and 3 years were 96%, 94%, and 92% for L1; and 94%, 83%, and 83% for L2; and 93%, 93%, and 93% for L3 (P = .5334).
CONCLUSIONS: EVAR can be used for patients with a short aortic neck; however, it was associated with a significantly higher rate of early and late type I endoleaks, resulting in an increased use of proximal aortic cuffs for sealing the endoleaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19595545     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  Editor's Choice - Renal complications after EVAR with suprarenal versus infrarenal fixation among all users and routine users.

Authors:  S L Zettervall; S E Deery; P A Soden; K Shean; J J Siracuse; M Alef; V I Patel; M L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 7.069

2.  Utility of aortic cuffs in converting initially ineligible patients due to unfavorable neck anatomy into successful candidates for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: A Case Series.

Authors:  Omer Awan; Mark Garcia; Yousaf Awan; Mandip Gakhal; Moonjohn Kim; Bogdan Iliescu; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2010-03-01

Review 3.  Advanced endografting techniques: snorkels, chimneys, periscopes, fenestrations, and branched endografts.

Authors:  Kartik Kansagra; Joseph Kang; Matthew-Czar Taon; Suvranu Ganguli; Ripal Gandhi; George Vatakencherry; Cuong Lam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

4.  The Endurant Stent Graft System: 15-month follow-up report in patients with challenging abdominal aortic anatomies.

Authors:  Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr; Tim F Weber; Drossos Kotelis; Fabian Rengier; Johannes Gahlen; Stefanie Böck; Jürgen Köhler; Christoph-M Ratusinski; Dittmar Böckler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Comparison of Renal Complications between Endografts with Suprarenal and Infrarenal Fixation.

Authors:  S L Zettervall; P A Soden; S E Deery; K Ultee; K E Shean; F Shuja; R L Amdur; M L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Feasibility of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outside of the instructions for use and morphological changes at 3 years after the procedure.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Hoshina; Takuya Hashimoto; Masaaki Kato; Nobukazu Ohkubo; Kunihiro Shigematsu; Tetsuro Miyata
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-28

Review 7.  [Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic prostheses : An update].

Authors:  Theresa-Marie Dachs; Sven Rudolf Hauck; Maximilian Kern; Catharina Klausenitz; Martin A Funovics
Journal:  Radiologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-20

8.  Innovative application of available stent grafts in Japan in aortic aneurysm treatment-significance of innovative debranching and chimney method and coil embolization procedure.

Authors:  Daisuke Fukui; Yuko Wada; Kazunori Komatsu; Taisi Fujii; Noburo Ohashi; Takamitsu Terasaki; Tatsuichiro Seto; Tamaki Takano; Jun Amano
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2013-09-05

9.  Thrombotic Occlusion of Stent Graft Limbs due to Severe Angulation of Aortic Neck in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Minsu Kim; Myeong Gun Kim; Woong Chol Kang; Pyung Chun Oh; Ji Yeon Lee; Jin Mo Kang; Wook-Jin Chung; Eak Kyun Shin
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Endograft Sizing for Endovascular Aortic Repair and Incidence of Endoleak Type 1A.

Authors:  Ruben V C Buijs; Clark J Zeebregts; Tineke P Willems; Tryfon Vainas; Ignace F J Tielliu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.