Literature DB >> 19594287

Hysteresis effects in a motor task with cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus).

Daniel J Weiss1, Jason Wark.   

Abstract

The way human adults grasp an object is influenced by their recent history of motor actions. Previously executed grasps are often more likely to reoccur on subsequent grasps. This type of hysteresis effect has been incorporated into cognitive models of motor planning, suggesting that when planning movements, individuals tend to reuse recently used plans rather than generating new plans from scratch. To the best of our knowledge, the phylogenetic roots of this phenomenon have not been investigated. Here, the authors asked whether 6 cotton-top tamarin monkeys (Saguinus oedipus) would demonstrate a hysteresis effect on a reaching task. The authors tested the monkeys by placing marshmallow pieces within grasping distance of a hole through which the monkeys could reach. On subsequent trials, the marshmallow position changed such that it progressed in an arc in either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction. The authors asked whether the transition point in right- versus left-handed reaches would differ depending on the direction of the progression. The data supported this hysteresis prediction. The outcome provides additional support for the notion that human motor planning strategies may have a lengthy evolutionary history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19594287     DOI: 10.1037/a0013964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  11 in total

1.  Human posterior parietal cortex mediates hand-specific planning.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Motor hysteresis in a sequential grasping and pointing task is absent in task-critical joints.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Matthias Weigelt; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Hand selection for object grasping is influenced by recent motor history.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

5.  Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-10-13

6.  Pulling to scale: Motor planning for sequences of repeated actions by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Kate M Chapman; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-04

7.  Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Movement plans for posture selection do not transfer across hands.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-11

9.  Now and then: Hand choice is influenced by recent action history.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Aoife M Fitzpatrick; Neil M Dundon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

10.  Shifts of the point-of-change can be attributed to a lower mechanical cost of motor execution.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.