Literature DB >> 1959394

Low-intensity anticoagulation in mechanical cardiac prosthetic valves.

D B Wilson1, M I Dunn, K Hassanein.   

Abstract

Retrospectively, we reviewed the charts of 101 patients at the University of Kansas Medical Center who received low-intensity anticoagulation for mechanical prosthetic valves implanted over a 17-yr period. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.6 yr, and the total duration of follow-up was 466.5 patient-yr. The patients' records were evaluated for evidence of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications. A prothrombin time ratio of 1.3 to 1.5 times control was considered to be low-intensity anticoagulation. There were three thromboembolic events or 2.9/100 patient-yr of follow-up at a prothrombin time ratio of less than 1.3, four thromboembolic events or 2.5/100 patient-yr of follow-up at 1.3 to 1.5 times control, four thromboembolic events or 2.2/100 patient-yr of follow-up at 1.6 to 2.0 times control, and no thromboembolic events at prothrombin time ratios greater than 2.0 times control. Hemorrhagic events occurred in three patients at a prothrombin time ratio of less than 1.3 times control or 2.8/100 patient-yr of follow-up, in six patients at 1.3 to 1.5 times control or 3.8/100 patient-yr of follow-up, in ten patients at 1.6 to 2.0 times control or 5.5/100 patient-yr of followup, and in two patients at 2.1 to 2.5 times control or 12.2/100 patient-yr of follow-up. The rate of hemorrhagic events at 2.5 times control was 470/100 patient-yr follow-up. While not providing definitive proof, we believe that our retrospective study provides supportive evidence for the use of low-intensity anticoagulation in patients with mechanical cardiac prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1959394     DOI: 10.1378/chest.100.6.1553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

Review 1.  Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Alexander S Gallus; Ann Wittkowsky; Mark Crowther; Elaine M Hylek; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Achieved anticoagulation vs prosthesis selection for mitral mechanical valve replacement: a population-based outcome study.

Authors:  Thierry Le Tourneau; Vanessa Lim; Jocelyn Inamo; Fletcher A Miller; Douglas W Mahoney; Hartzell V Schaff; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Current status of anticoagulation and thrombosis-related issues in mechanical valves.

Authors:  R J Gray
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

Review 4.  Relationship between test frequency and outcomes of anticoagulation: a literature review and commentary with implications for the design of randomized trials of patient self-management.

Authors:  G P Samsa; D B Matchar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Drug treatment associated with heart valve replacement.

Authors:  D S Coulshed; M A Fitzpatrick; C H Lee
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  The effects of lower intensity anticoagulation therapy on coagulation system in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves.

Authors:  X Du; K Zhang; Z Hu; H Lan; J Luo; Y Jin
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  1999
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.