Literature DB >> 19593609

Fludarabine and melphalan conditioning with tacrolimus as GVHD prophylaxis for allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients is an effective reduced-intensity combination regimen compared to the conventional regimen.

Osamu Imataki1, Hiroaki Ohnishi, Yumiko Ohbayashi, Akira Kitanaka, Yoshitsugu Kubota, Toshihiko Ishida, Terukazu Tanaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a reduced-intensity stem-cell transplantation (RIST) regimen, the combination of fludarabine and melphalan (FM) with an appropriate immunosuppressant reduces nonrelapse mortality (NRM).
METHODS: We retrospectively compared the efficacy of a RIST regimen with FM with that of a conventional stem cell transplantation (CST) regimen. Eighty-two consecutive hematological patients who underwent allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) at our hospital were enrolled. Preparation for RIST consisted of 25 mg/m(2) fludarabine and melphalan 70 mg/m(2). The conventional regimen employed high-dose cyclophosphamide and total-body irradiation (12 Gy) or busulfan and high-dose cyclophosphamide. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for RIST consisted of tacrolimus alone or in conjunction with short-term methotrexate for unrelated donors.
RESULTS: Of the 82 patients, 42 received the conventional CST regimen (median age, 35 years) and 40 received the RIST regimen (median age, 51 years). The probability of NRM was 17% (7/42) in the CST group and 8% (3/40) in the RIST group. Grade II to IV GVHD occurred in significantly more CST patients (38%) than RIST patients (28%). However, the overall survival was the same in the two groups (43%).
CONCLUSION: The RIST regimen with FM incorporating tacrolimus and methotrexate demonstrated low TRM incidence and moderate control of GVHD and had efficacy comparable to that of the CST regimen, despite the advanced age of the RIST patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19593609     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-008-0826-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  14 in total

1.  Stable engraftment after a conditioning regimen with fludarabine and melphalan for bone marrow transplantation from an unrelated donor.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Inamoto; Taku Oba; Koichi Miyamura; Seitaro Terakura; Akane Tsujimura; Yachiyo Kuwatsuka; Masahiro Tokunaga; Masanobu Kasai; Makoto Murata; Tomoki Naoe; Yoshihisa Kodera
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  Reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: current perspectives.

Authors:  Brenda M Sandmaier; Stephen Mackinnon; Richard W Childs
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Limiting transplantation-related mortality following unrelated donor stem cell transplantation by using a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen.

Authors:  Ronjon Chakraverty; Karl Peggs; Rajesh Chopra; Donald W Milligan; Panagiotis D Kottaridis; Stephanie Verfuerth; Johanne Geary; Dharsha Thuraisundaram; Kate Branson; Suparno Chakrabarti; Premini Mahendra; Charles Craddock; Anne Parker; Ann Hunter; Geoff Hale; Herman Waldmann; Catherine D Williams; Kwee Yong; David C Linch; Anthony H Goldstone; Stephen Mackinnon
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemias: 'what is the best recipe?'.

Authors:  A A Kassim; W Chinratanalab; J L M Ferrara; S Mineishi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  The primacy of the gastrointestinal tract as a target organ of acute graft-versus-host disease: rationale for the use of cytokine shields in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  G R Hill; J L Ferrara
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: harnessing graft-versus-leukemia without myeloablative therapy.

Authors:  S Giralt; E Estey; M Albitar; K van Besien; G Rondón; P Anderlini; S O'Brien; I Khouri; J Gajewski; R Mehra; D Claxton; B Andersson; M Beran; D Przepiorka; C Koller; S Kornblau; M Kørbling; M Keating; H Kantarjian; R Champlin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative versus conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Marco Mielcarek; Paul J Martin; Wendy Leisenring; Mary E D Flowers; David G Maloney; Brenda M Sandmaier; Michael B Maris; Rainer Storb
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Karnofsky Memorial Lecture. Marrow transplantation for malignant diseases.

Authors:  E D Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine used for prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease improves outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors, but not from HLA-identical sibling donors: a nationwide survey conducted in Japan.

Authors:  M Yanada; N Emi; T Naoe; H Sakamaki; S Takahashi; N Hirabayashi; A Hiraoka; Y Kanda; R Tanosaki; S Okamoto; K Iwato; Y Atsuta; N Hamajima; M Tanimoto; S Kato
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after ablative and nonmyeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel R Couriel; Rima M Saliba; Sergio Giralt; Issa Khouri; Borje Andersson; Marcos de Lima; Chitra Hosing; Paolo Anderlini; Michelle Donato; Karen Cleary; James Gajewski; Joyce Neumann; Cindy Ippoliti; Gabriela Rondon; Agueda Cohen; Richard Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.