Literature DB >> 19593418

Ankle bracing and the neuromuscular factors influencing joint stiffness.

Steven M Zinder1, Kevin P Granata, Sandra J Shultz, Bruce M Gansneder.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Health care professionals commonly prescribe external stabilization to decrease the incidence and severity of ankle sprains. The mechanism for this decrease is not clearly understood. Examining the effects of ankle bracing on biomechanical stability and influencing factors may provide important information regarding the neuromuscular effects of bracing.
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of 2 different ankle braces on the neuromuscular factors influencing ankle stiffness.
DESIGN: Mixed-model repeated-measures design.
SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight physically active participants composing 2 groups: 14 with unilateral functional ankle instability (age = 26.19 +/- 6.46 years, height = 166.07 +/- 12.90 cm, mass = 69.90 +/- 13.46 kg) and 14 with bilaterally stable ankles (age = 23.76 +/- 5.82 years, height = 174.00 +/- 11.67 cm, mass = 68.60 +/- 13.12 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants were fitted with surface electromyography electrodes over the peroneus longus, peroneus brevis, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles. Each participant received transient motion oscillations to his or her ankle on a custom-built medial-lateral swaying cradle in each of 3 conditions: no ankle brace (NB), lace-up brace (LU), and semirigid brace (SR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ankle stiffness as measured by the cradle and preactivation levels (percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction) of the 4 test muscles.
RESULTS: Stiffness levels increased across brace conditions (NB = 24.79 +/- 6.59 Nm/rad, LU = 28.29 +/- 7.05 Nm/rad, SR = 33.22 +/- 8.78 Nm/rad; F(2,52) = 66.185, P < .001). No differences were found between groups for rotational stiffness (stable = 27.36 +/- 6.17 Nm/rad, unstable = 30.18 +/- 8.21 Nm/rad; F(1,26) = 1.084, P = .307). Preactivation levels did not change for any of the tested muscles with the application of an ankle brace (F(2,52) = 1.326, P = .275).
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in ankle rotational stiffness with the addition of an ankle brace and the lack of any demonstrable neuromuscular changes suggested ankle braces passively contributed to the stability of the system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  orthoses; preactivation; reflexes; stability

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19593418      PMCID: PMC2707072          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.4.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  38 in total

Review 1.  Managing ankle injuries in the emergency department.

Authors:  R B Birrer; M H Fani-Salek; V Y Totten; L M Herman; V Politi
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 2.  Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.

Authors:  A Bergmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

3.  The effect of an abdominal belt on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure during squat lifts.

Authors:  S M McGill; R W Norman; M T Sharratt
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Proprioception and joint stability.

Authors:  J Jerosch; M Prymka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Role of muscles in lumbar spine stability in maximum extension efforts.

Authors:  M Gardner-Morse; I A Stokes; J P Laible
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains.

Authors:  J G Garrick; R K Requa
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1973

7.  Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with displacement amplitude.

Authors:  R E Kearney; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A prospective study of ankle injury risk factors.

Authors:  J F Baumhauer; D M Alosa; A F Renström; S Trevino; B Beynnon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Inversion lateral ankle trauma: differential diagnosis, review of the literature, and prospective study.

Authors:  M Perlman; D Leveille; J DeLeonibus; R Hartman; J Klein; R Handelman; E Schulz; S Wertheimer
Journal:  J Foot Surg       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr

Review 10.  Effectiveness of prophylactic ankle stabilisers for prevention of ankle injuries.

Authors:  M R Sitler; M Horodyski
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Assessing musculo-articular stiffness using free oscillations: theory, measurement and analysis.

Authors:  Massimiliano Ditroilo; Mark Watsford; Aron Murphy; Giuseppe De Vito
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of ankle braces on lower extremity muscle activation during functional exercises in participants with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Mark A Feger; Luke Donovan; Joe M Hart; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08

3.  People with chronic ankle instability benefit from brace application in highly dynamic change of direction movements.

Authors:  Patrick Fuerst; Albert Gollhofer; Markus Wenning; Dominic Gehring
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Angle-torque relationship of the subtalar pronators and supinators in younger and elderly males and females.

Authors:  Marco Hagen; Daniel Sanchez-Bergmann; Sebastian Seidel; Matthias Lahner
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.303

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.