Literature DB >> 19592503

Analysis of 75 marketed pharmaceuticals using the GADD45a-GFP 'GreenScreen HC' genotoxicity assay.

Paul W Hastwell1, Thomas W Webster, Matthew Tate, Nicholas Billinton, Anthony M Lynch, James S Harvey, Robert W Rees, Richard M Walmsley.   

Abstract

The GADD45a-GFP (GreenScreen HC) reporter assay detects genotoxic damage in the human lymphoblastoid TK6 cell line and gives positive results for all classes of genotoxin, including mutagens, aneugens and clastogens. In this study, a collection of 75 marketed pharmaceuticals were tested in the assay. Compounds in the collection represent a broad range of chemical structures, pharmacologies and therapeutic indications, including neoplasia and viral infection where positive genotoxicity results are often associated with the pharmacological activity. Based on the results of this study, two main conclusions can be drawn: (i) the GreenScreen HC is more predictive of in vivo genotoxicity (88%) and genotoxic carcinogenicity (93%) data than the any of the other regulatory in vitro genotoxicity assay and (ii) no compounds were uniquely positive in the GADD45a-GFP assay. This analysis therefore provides additional evidence to support the use of the GADD45a-GFP assay as an effective tool either in early genotoxic liability identification or non-clinical safety assessment of candidate pharmaceuticals during development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19592503     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gep029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  9 in total

Review 1.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Genotoxicity of the some selective estrogen receptor modulators: a review.

Authors:  Serkan Yilmaz; Ilknur M Gönenç; Ebru Yilmaz
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines.

Authors:  S H Doak; B Manshian; G J S Jenkins; N Singh
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Development of a Fish Cell Biosensor System for Genotoxicity Detection Based on DNA Damage-Induced Trans-Activation of p21 Gene Expression.

Authors:  Deyu Geng; Zhixia Zhang; Huarong Guo
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-10

5.  Evaluation of impedance-based label-free technology as a tool for pharmacology and toxicology investigations.

Authors:  Franck André Atienzar; Helga Gerets; Karen Tilmant; Gaëlle Toussaint; Stéphane Dhalluin
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-15

6.  QSAR ligand dataset for modelling mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and rodent carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Davy Guan; Kevin Fan; Ian Spence; Slade Matthews
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-02-02

7.  The BlueScreen HC assay to predict the genotoxic potential of fragrance materials.

Authors:  Yax Thakkar; Kaushal Joshi; Christina Hickey; Joseph Wahler; Brian Wall; Sylvain Etter; Benjamin Smith; Peter Griem; Matthew Tate; Frank Jones; Gladys Oudraogo; Stefan Pfuhler; Christopher Choi; Gary Williams; Helmut Greim; Gerhard Eisenbrand; Wolfgang Dekant; Anne Marie Api
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Aneugenic effects of epirubicin in somatic and germinal cells of male mice.

Authors:  Sabry Mohamed Attia; Sheikh Fayaz Ahmad; Radwa Mohamed Okash; Saleh Abdulrahman Bakheet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Evaluation of the Suitability of Mammalian In Vitro Assays to Assess the Genotoxic Potential of Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Bernhard Rainer; Thomas Czerny; Elisabeth Riegel; Benoît Schilter; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-02-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.