Literature DB >> 19592038

In vitro S. epidermidis and S. aureus adherence to composite and lightweight polypropylene grafts.

Kuzey Aydinuraz1, Canan Ağalar, Fatih Ağalar, Sabahat Ceken, Nihal Duruyürek, Tayfun Vural.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant risk of infection, prosthetic graft materials have become indispensable for incisional hernia repair. Composite and lightweight grafts have been developed to overcome adhesion and rigidity. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro S. epidermidis and S. aureus adherence to these new generation grafts, which have modified composition and textile properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, sterile samples of multifilament polypropylene, multifilament lightweight composite, monofilament composite, and monofilament polypropylene grafts were incubated with slime positive S. epidermidis and S. aureus strains for 24 h. The grafts were washed and vortexed in saline. The saline was passaged to blood agar and incubated for 24 h. The colonies were counted. Naïve and incubated graft materials were examined by scanning electron microscopy to reveal both textile properties and biofilm formation. Physicochemical properties were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Friedman test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: S. epidermidis showed a significantly decreased adherence to monofilament polypropylene graft, and increased adherence to multifilament polypropylene graft (P<0.05). S. aureus showed a significant affinity for monofilament composite graft (P<0.05). SEM studies showed that biofilm formation was present on multifilament polypropylene graft.
CONCLUSIONS: Both S. epidermidis and S. aureus had significantly less adherence to multifilament lightweight composite than multifilament polypropylene graft. S. epidermidis showed a greater affinity to monofilament composite graft compared with monofilament polypropylene graft. Overall S. epidermidis adherence for multifilament lightweight composite and monofilament composite was less than multifilament polypropylene and higher than monofilament polypropylene. S. epidermidis and S. aureus showed different adherence for each graft. Changes in material composition and textile properties may well influence bacterial adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19592038     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  12 in total

1.  Searching for the best polypropylene mesh to be used in bowel contamination.

Authors:  A Díaz-Godoy; M A García-Ureña; J López-Monclús; V Vega Ruíz; D Melero Montes; N Erquinigo Agurto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Synthesis, Characterization, and in vitro Testing of a Bacteria-Targeted MR Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Lauren M Matosziuk; Allison S Harney; Keith W Macrenaris; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Eur J Inorg Chem       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.524

3.  Novel in vitro model for assessing susceptibility of synthetic hernia repair meshes to Staphylococcus aureus infection using green fluorescent protein-labeled bacteria and modern imaging techniques.

Authors:  Ihab Halaweish; Karem Harth; Ann-Marie Broome; Gabriela Voskerician; Michael R Jacobs; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  History of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surgical site infection may not be a contraindication to ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C W Hicks; J A Blatnik; D M Krpata; Y W Novitsky; M J Rosen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Does presoaking synthetic mesh in antibiotic solution reduce mesh infections? An experimental study.

Authors:  Emmanuel E Sadava; David M Krpata; Yue Gao; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Biofilms and effective porosity of hernia mesh: are they silent assassins?

Authors:  A S W Jacombs; A Karatassas; B Klosterhalfen; K Richter; P Patiniott; C Hensman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence.

Authors:  D Sanders; J Lambie; P Bond; R Moate; J A Steer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Transcription and translation products of the cytolysin gene psm-mec on the mobile genetic element SCCmec regulate Staphylococcus aureus virulence.

Authors:  Chikara Kaito; Yuki Saito; Gentaro Nagano; Mariko Ikuo; Yosuke Omae; Yuichi Hanada; Xiao Han; Kyoko Kuwahara-Arai; Tomomi Hishinuma; Tadashi Baba; Teruyo Ito; Keiichi Hiramatsu; Kazuhisa Sekimizu
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Evaluation of a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate/absorbable barrier composite mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Scott; Corey R Deeken; Robert G Martindale; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Preclinical Bioassay of a Polypropylene Mesh for Hernia Repair Pretreated with Antibacterial Solutions of Chlorhexidine and Allicin: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Francisca García-Moreno; Thierry Brune; Gemma Pascual; Juan Manuel Bellón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.