BACKGROUND: California has significantly decreased racial/ethnic and educational disparities in smoke-free home and indoor work policies. California's ethnic-specific surveys present an opportunity to disaggregate data and examine the impact of California's smoke-free social norm campaign for Asian-American women. METHODS: The California Tobacco Use Surveys for Chinese Americans and Korean Americans were conducted in 2003 and analyzed in 2008 to compare women with lower (<or= high school graduate) or higher education status for smoke-free policy adoption and enforcement. RESULTS: Lower-educated and higher-educated women had similar proportions of smoke-free policies at home (58%) or indoor work (90%). However, lower-educated women were more likely than higher-educated women to report anyone ever smoking at home (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.06, 2.48, p=0.03) and exposure during the past 2 weeks at an indoor workplace (OR=2.43, 95% CI= 1.30, 4.55, p=0.005), even after controlling for ethnicity, smoke-free policy, knowledge about the health consequences of secondhand smoke exposure, and acculturation. There was no interaction between education and knowledge about secondhand smoke health harms. CONCLUSIONS: The intended consequences of California's tobacco-control efforts have resulted in similar rates of smoke-free policies at home and in indoor work environments among Asian-American women across educational levels. However, an unintended consequence of this success is a disparity in enforcement by educational status, with lower-educated Asian-American women reporting greater smoke exposure despite similar rates of knowledge about the health consequences of secondhand smoke exposure. Besides establishing policies, lower-educated Asian-American women may need to be empowered to assert and enforce their right to smoke-free environments.
BACKGROUND: California has significantly decreased racial/ethnic and educational disparities in smoke-free home and indoor work policies. California's ethnic-specific surveys present an opportunity to disaggregate data and examine the impact of California's smoke-free social norm campaign for Asian-American women. METHODS: The California Tobacco Use Surveys for Chinese Americans and Korean Americans were conducted in 2003 and analyzed in 2008 to compare women with lower (<or= high school graduate) or higher education status for smoke-free policy adoption and enforcement. RESULTS: Lower-educated and higher-educated women had similar proportions of smoke-free policies at home (58%) or indoor work (90%). However, lower-educated women were more likely than higher-educated women to report anyone ever smoking at home (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.06, 2.48, p=0.03) and exposure during the past 2 weeks at an indoor workplace (OR=2.43, 95% CI= 1.30, 4.55, p=0.005), even after controlling for ethnicity, smoke-free policy, knowledge about the health consequences of secondhand smoke exposure, and acculturation. There was no interaction between education and knowledge about secondhand smoke health harms. CONCLUSIONS: The intended consequences of California'stobacco-control efforts have resulted in similar rates of smoke-free policies at home and in indoor work environments among Asian-American women across educational levels. However, an unintended consequence of this success is a disparity in enforcement by educational status, with lower-educated Asian-American women reporting greater smoke exposure despite similar rates of knowledge about the health consequences of secondhand smoke exposure. Besides establishing policies, lower-educated Asian-American women may need to be empowered to assert and enforce their right to smoke-free environments.
Authors: Grace X Ma; Steven E Shive; Yin Tan; Jamil I Toubbeh; Carolyn Y Fang; Rosita L Edwards Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Lois Biener; Catherine A Garrett; Elizabeth A Gilpin; Anthony M Roman; Douglas B Currivan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Elisa K Tong; Pebbles Fagan; Leslie Cooper; Maria Canto; William Carroll; John Foster-Bey; James R Hébert; Maria Lopez-Class; Grace X Ma; Patricia Nez Henderson; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; LorrieAnn Santos; Justin H Smith; Yin Tan; Janice Tsoh; Kenneth Chu Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Carla J Berg; Laura Lessard; Pratibha P Parelkar; James Thrasher; Michelle C Kegler; Cam Escoffery; Kathryn Goldade; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2010-12-01
Authors: Jon-Patrick Allem; John W Ayers; Jennifer B Unger; Robert E Vollinger; Carl Latkin; Hee-Soon Juon; Hae-Ryun Park; Hee-Young Paik; C Richard Hofstetter; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Asia Pac J Public Health Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 1.399