Literature DB >> 19589629

Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (protect): proposed numerical benchmark values.

Pål Andersson1, Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace, Nicholas A Beresford, David Copplestone, Brenda J Howard, Paul Howe, Deborah Oughton, Paul Whitehouse.   

Abstract

Criteria are needed to be able to judge the level of risk associated with dose rates estimated for non-human biota. In this paper, European guidance on the derivation of predicted no-effect chemical concentrations has been applied to appropriate radiation sensitivity data. A species sensitivity distribution fitted to the data for all species resulted in a generic predicted no-effect dose rate of 10 microGy h(-1).Currently, data are inadequate to derive screening values for separate organism groups. A second, higher, benchmark could aid in decision making by putting results into context on the scale of no effect to a risk of 'serious' effect. The need for, meaning and use of such a value needs to be debated by the wider community. This paper explores potential approaches of deriving scientific input to this debate. The concepts proposed in this paper are broadly consistent with the framework for human protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19589629     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Radioact        ISSN: 0265-931X            Impact factor:   2.674


  13 in total

1.  Application of an environmental impact assessment methodology to a site discharging low levels of radioactivity to a freshwater environment in Norway.

Authors:  Ali Hosseini; Justin Emrys Brown; Mark Dowdall; William Standring; Per Strand
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Inter-comparison of population models for the calculation of radiation dose effects on wildlife.

Authors:  Jordi Vives I Batlle; Tatiana G Sazykina; Alexander Kryshev; Luigi Monte; Isao Kawaguchi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Effects of radioactive contamination on Scots pines in the remote period after the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  Stanislav Geras'kin; Alla Oudalova; Nina Dikareva; Sergey Spiridonov; Thomas Hinton; Elena Chernonog; Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 4.  Whole-body to tissue concentration ratios for use in biota dose assessments for animals.

Authors:  Tamara L Yankovich; Nicholas A Beresford; Michael D Wood; Tasuo Aono; Pål Andersson; Catherine L Barnett; Pamela Bennett; Justin E Brown; Sergey Fesenko; J Fesenko; Ali Hosseini; Brenda J Howard; Mathew P Johansen; Marcel M Phaneuf; Keiko Tagami; Hyoe Takata; John R Twining; Shigeo Uchida
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Modelling the effects of ionizing radiation on survival of animal population: acute versus chronic exposure.

Authors:  A I Kryshev; T G Sazykina
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  An approach to the assessment of risk from chronic radiation to populations of European lobster, Homarus gammarus (L.).

Authors:  Jordi Vives i Batlle; R C Wilson; S J Watts; P McDonald; S R Jones; S M Vives-Lynch; A Craze
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Assessment of long-term radiological effects on plants and animals from a deep geological repository: no discernible impact detected.

Authors:  Jesper Torudd; Peter Saetre
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Decline in intertidal biota after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami and the Fukushima nuclear disaster: field observations.

Authors:  Toshihiro Horiguchi; Hiroshi Yoshii; Satoshi Mizuno; Hiroaki Shiraishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Radiocaesium transfer and radiation exposure of frogs in Fukushima Prefecture.

Authors:  Keiko Tagami; Shigeo Uchida; Michael D Wood; Nicholas A Beresford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.