Literature DB >> 19588271

Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity.

Andrea Marinozzi1, Nicolò Martinelli, Manlio Panascì, Francesco Cancilleri, Edoardo Franceschetti, Bruno Vincenzi, Alberto Di Martino, Vincenzo Denaro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients affected by hallux valgus.
METHODS: The MOXFQ was translated into Italian and culturally adapted following the forward and backward translation method. A sample of 172 patients with hallux valgus was asked to fill in the MOXFQ and the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). Two-week retest was performed on a random sub-sample of 40 patients. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was assessed with the use of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, using a priori hypothesized correlations with SF-36 domains.
RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability was acceptable for all MOXFQ domains (Pain, Walking/standing and Social interaction) with Cronbachs' alpha coefficients ranging from 0.72 to 0.83. The assessment of test-retest reliability reveals satisfactory values with ICCs ranging from 0.85 to 0.92. Construct validity was supported by the presence of all the hypothesized correlation, with the exception of Italian Walking/standing domain with the SF-36 Role-Physical domain (rho = -0.29).
CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of MOXFQ is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating foot pain and functional status in patients affected by hallux valgus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19588271     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9508-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  11 in total

Review 1.  Development and validation of health-related quality of life measures for the knee.

Authors:  James J Irrgang; Allen F Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Interventions for treating hallux valgus (abductovalgus) and bunions.

Authors:  J Ferrari; J P T Higgins; T D Prior
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

3.  Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus.

Authors:  J Dawson; H Doll; J Coffey; C Jenkinson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming.

Authors:  G Apolone; P Mosconi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--II: Scaling methods.

Authors:  D G Froberg; R L Kane
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  F Guillemin; C Bombardier; D Beaton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Jane Coffey; Helen Doll; Grahame Lavis; Paul Cooke; Mark Herron; Crispin Jenkinson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The prevalence of foot problems in older women: a cause for concern.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Margaret Thorogood; Sally-Anne Marks; Ed Juszczak; Chris Dodd; Grahame Lavis; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2002-06

9.  A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?

Authors:  Gavin Button; Stephen Pinney
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Foot pain and disability in older women.

Authors:  S G Leveille; J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; R Hirsch; E Simonsick; M C Hochberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases.

Authors:  Yuanxi Jia; Hsiaomin Huang; Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Validation of pediatric Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: patient version 2 of "brain tumor survivor" for grade school patients aged 7-12 years.

Authors:  Heejung Yoo; Young-Shin Ra; Hyeon-Jin Park; Jin-Shei Lai; David Cella; Hee-Young Shin; Dong-Seok Kim; Woo-Chul Kim; Yong-Soon Shin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Validation of Pediatric Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Questionnaire (Version 2.0) in Brain Tumor Survivor Aged 13 Years and Older (Parent Form)(PedsFACT-BrS Parent of Adolescent).

Authors:  Hee-Jung Yoo; Dong-Seok Kim; Jin-Shei Lai; David Cella; Hee-Young Shin; Young-Shin Ra
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-03-31

Review 4.  Measures of foot function, foot health, and foot pain: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Assessment: Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAM), Bristol Foot Score (BFS), Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R), Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI), Podiatric Health Questionnaire (PHQ), and Rowan Foot Pain Assessment (ROFPAQ).

Authors:  Jody L Riskowski; Thomas J Hagedorn; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS).

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Grahame Lavis
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  An analysis of Euroqol EQ-5D and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire scores six months following podiatric surgery.

Authors:  Anthony J Maher; Timothy E Kilmartin
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  The effect of BMI on long-term outcomes after operatively treated ankle fractures: a study with up to 16 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Diogo Vieira Cardoso; Joris Paccaud; Victor Dubois-Ferrière; Christophe Barea; Didier Hannouche; Andrea Veljkovic; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index into Spanish.

Authors:  Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron; Mwidimi Ndosi; Alejandro Luque-Suarez; Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch; Pedro Vicente Munuera; Adam Garrow; Anthony C Redmond
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score.

Authors:  D Morley; C Jenkinson; H Doll; G Lavis; R Sharp; P Cooke; J Dawson
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.