BACKGROUND: Minority populations have been under-represented in mental health research studies. The systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder developed the Community Partners Program (CPP) to address this issue in a large, prospective treatment study of persons with bipolar disorder. PURPOSE: The primary goal of CPP was to develop a community-based infrastructure for studying bipolar disorder that would enhance the ethnic/racial and socioeconomic diversity of participants. METHODS: Selected academic sites partnered with local clinics (n = 6 partnerships in five cities). This report describes the conceptualization, implementation, and qualitative evaluation of CPP, as well as quantitative analysis of clinical and sociodemographic differences between the samples recruited at academic versus community sites. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of the 155 participants from the six partnerships revealed enrollment of 45% from minority populations (vs. 15% in academic sites). Significant sociodemographic differences were evident not only between academic and community sites, but within minority and non-minority groups across site types. Notably, clinical differences were not evident between participants from academic and community sites. Review of qualitative data suggests that certain factors around implementation of research protocols may enhance community participation. CONCLUSIONS: Moving research recruitment and participation into community sites was more successful in increasing minority enrollment than efforts to attract such individuals to academic sites. Recommendations for creating and maintaining academic/community partnerships are given. LIMITATIONS: Several important variables were not considered including mood severity, hospitalization, or treatment differences. Minority participants were grouped by combining African American and Hispanics, which may have obscured subgroup differences. A derivation of standard qualitative methods was used in this study.
BACKGROUND: Minority populations have been under-represented in mental health research studies. The systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder developed the Community Partners Program (CPP) to address this issue in a large, prospective treatment study of persons with bipolar disorder. PURPOSE: The primary goal of CPP was to develop a community-based infrastructure for studying bipolar disorder that would enhance the ethnic/racial and socioeconomic diversity of participants. METHODS: Selected academic sites partnered with local clinics (n = 6 partnerships in five cities). This report describes the conceptualization, implementation, and qualitative evaluation of CPP, as well as quantitative analysis of clinical and sociodemographic differences between the samples recruited at academic versus community sites. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of the 155 participants from the six partnerships revealed enrollment of 45% from minority populations (vs. 15% in academic sites). Significant sociodemographic differences were evident not only between academic and community sites, but within minority and non-minority groups across site types. Notably, clinical differences were not evident between participants from academic and community sites. Review of qualitative data suggests that certain factors around implementation of research protocols may enhance community participation. CONCLUSIONS: Moving research recruitment and participation into community sites was more successful in increasing minority enrollment than efforts to attract such individuals to academic sites. Recommendations for creating and maintaining academic/community partnerships are given. LIMITATIONS: Several important variables were not considered including mood severity, hospitalization, or treatment differences. Minority participants were grouped by combining African American and Hispanics, which may have obscured subgroup differences. A derivation of standard qualitative methods was used in this study.
Authors: Jodi Gonzalez Arnold; Stephanie Salcedo; Terrence A Ketter; Joseph R Calabrese; Dustin J Rabideau; Andrew A Nierenberg; Melissa Bazan; Andrew C Leon; Edward S Friedman; Dan Iosifescu; Louisa G Sylvia; Michael Ostacher; Michael Thase; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Charles L Bowden Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-03-14 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Thomas W Concannon; Melissa Fuster; Tully Saunders; Kamal Patel; John B Wong; Laurel K Leslie; Joseph Lau Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lyndsay A Nelson; Sarah E Williamson; Lauren M LeStourgeon; Lindsay S Mayberry Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: Margaret O Akinhanmi; Joanna M Biernacka; Stephen M Strakowski; Susan L McElroy; Joyce E Balls Berry; Kathleen R Merikangas; Shervin Assari; Melvin G McInnis; Thomas G Schulze; Marion LeBoyer; Carol Tamminga; Christi Patten; Mark A Frye Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Beatrice Huang; Denise De Vore; Chris Chirinos; Jessica Wolf; Devon Low; Rachel Willard-Grace; Stephanie Tsao; Chris Garvey; Doranne Donesky; George Su; David H Thom Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 4.615