Literature DB >> 19586722

Pain language and gender differences when describing a past pain event.

J Strong1, T Mathews, R Sussex, F New, S Hoey, G Mitchell.   

Abstract

Pain is a largely subjective experience, and one which is difficult to convey to others, and relies significantly on language to be communicated. The language used to describe pain is therefore an important aspect of understanding and assessing another's pain. A growing body of research has reported differences in the pain experienced by men and women. However, few studies have examined gender differences, where gender is understood in both the biological and the social sense, in the language used when reporting pain. The purpose of this descriptive and analytical study was to explore gender differences in the language used by articulate men and women when describing a recollected painful event. Two-hundred and one students from an Australian university (35.32% males and 64.68% females) provided written descriptions of a past pain event. These descriptions were analysed using content analysis. Gender differences were identified in the words and patterns of language used, the focus of pain descriptions, and the reported emotional response to pain. Women were found to use more words (t=4.87, p<0.001), more McGill Pain Questionnaire descriptors (chi(2)=3.07, p<0.05), more graphic language than men, and typically focused on the sensory aspects of their pain event. Men used fewer words, less descriptive language, and focused on events and emotions. Common themes were the functional limitations caused by pain, difficulty in describing pain, and the dual nature of pain. Clinical implications include the value of gathering free pain descriptions as part of assessment, and the use of written pain descriptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19586722     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Pain Research: A Narrative Review of Emerging Pain Methods, Their Technosocial Implications, and Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Approaches.

Authors:  Sara E Berger; Alexis T Baria
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Patient Race, Ethnicity, Language, and Pain Severity in Primary Care: A Retrospective Electronic Health Record Study.

Authors:  Maichou Lor; Theresa A Koleck
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.356

3.  Prevalence of Biopsychosocial Factors of Pain in 865 Sports Students of the Dach (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) Region - A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Anke Bumann; Winfried Banzer; Johannes Fleckenstein
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  The psycholinguistic and affective structure of words conveying pain.

Authors:  Eleonora Borelli; Davide Crepaldi; Carlo Adolfo Porro; Cristina Cacciari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  'Barbed wire wrapped around my feet': Metaphor use in chronic pain.

Authors:  Imogene Munday; Toby Newton-John; Ian Kneebone
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2020-05-25

6.  Pain quality descriptors and sex-related differences in patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Chi-Lun Rau; Jing-Lan Yang; Jiu-Jenq Lin; Pei-Chi Wu; Chieh-Yi Hou; Chen-Yi Song; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.