Literature DB >> 19586427

Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies.

G David Adamson1.   

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is the most successful treatment for the 9% of people at reproductive age who suffer with infertility, but only a small percentage of those needing ART actually access it. Access varies greatly internationally owing to religious, cultural and political factors, probably the most important factor being each society's perspective on the moral status of the embryo. Economic factors, the nature of the healthcare system and public funding affect access both among and within countries. Regulations and guidelines are highly variable, but critical, in determining access and types of services. Cross-border travel for reproductive care is not uncommon. In the future, better public funding of ART, technological improvements, lower cost and slow international harmonization with fewer differences in ART services will probably increase access significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19586427     DOI: 10.2217/whe.09.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)        ISSN: 1745-5057


  11 in total

1.  A Comparison of Immigrant and Canadian-Born Patients Seeking Fertility Treatment.

Authors:  Phyllis Zelkowitz; Leonora King; Rob Whitley; Togas Tulandi; Carolyn Ells; Nancy Feeley; Ian Gold; Zeev Rosberger; Peter Chan; Sharon Bond; Neal Mahutte; Sophia Ouhilal; Hananel Holzer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-08

2.  The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties.

Authors:  Jacky Boivin; Janet Takefman; Andrea Braverman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Cultural determinants influence assisted reproduction usage in Europe more than economic and demographic factors.

Authors:  Patrick Präg; Melinda C Mills
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil.

Authors:  Shana Ginar da Silva; Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi; Mariângela Freitas da Silveira; Marlos Rodrigues Domingues; Kelly R Evenson; Iná Silva Dos Santos
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  Development and Validation of A Decision-Making Donor Conception Questionnaire in Iranian Infertile Couples.

Authors:  Fatemeh Hadizadeh-Talasaz; Masoumeh Simbar; Habibollah Esmaily; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-07-14

6.  Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection.

Authors:  James M Kemper; Christopher Gyngell; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 1.352

7.  Honeymoon, medical treatment or big business? An analysis of the meanings of the term "reproductive tourism" in German and Israeli public media discourses.

Authors:  Sharon Bassan; Merle A Michaelsen
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.464

8.  Cosmopolitan conceptions in global Dubai? The emiratization of IVF and its consequences.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-05-20

9.  Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

Authors:  C Calhaz-Jorge; C H De Geyter; M S Kupka; C Wyns; E Mocanu; T Motrenko; G Scaravelli; J Smeenk; S Vidakovic; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-02-06

10.  The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties.

Authors:  Jacky Boivin; Janet Takefman; Andrea Braverman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 7.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.