Literature DB >> 19585068

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) partial nephrectomy in a porcine model.

Ugur Boylu1, Mathew Oommen, Virendra Joshi, Raju Thomas, Benjamin R Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transgastric partial nephrectomy without hilar clamping in a porcine model.
METHODS: A 45-kg male pig was placed in the supine position after endotracheal general anesthesia. A therapeutic gastroscope was introduced through the esophagus, and a 2-cm gastrotomy was performed using a diathermy electrocautery needle at the junction of the fundus and the proximal body. After incision of Gerota's fascia, the left kidney's upper pole was excised using the thulium laser without hilar dissection or clamping. An endoscopic wire loop was used to entrap and extract the specimen into the stomach. The gastroscope was subsequently withdrawn with the intact specimen. After hemostasis via reinsertion of the endoscope was ensured, metal clips were applied endoscopically to close the gastrotomy.
RESULTS: The total operative time for the NOTES transgastric partial nephrectomy was 240 min. Use of the therapeutic double-channel gastroscope allowed for scarless NOTES. The available 3.7- and 2.8-mm gastroscope ports were used for gastrotomy, excision, removal of the specimen, and endoscopic clip application. The procedure was performed in a nonischemic fashion with application of the thulium laser, which provided adequate hemostasis. No further interventions such as suturing of the renal capsule or use of hemostatic agents were required. The final specimen was 3 cm in size, and the estimated blood loss was 200 ml. A major drawback of the thulium laser was excessive smoke produced by vaporization of the tissue, which was minimized with the use of external irrigation.
CONCLUSION: The findings show that NOTES transgastric partial nephrectomy with thulium laser is feasible. Further studies are needed to demonstrate long-term efficacy and provide additional data regarding practical applications of this novel approach and technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19585068     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0610-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm.

Authors:  Michael F McGee; Michael J Rosen; Jeffrey Marks; Raymond P Onders; Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Victor K Chen; Jeffrey Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 3.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Uzzo; A C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Less smoke and minimal tissue carbonization using a thulium laser for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar clamping in a porcine model.

Authors:  Matthew H Bui; Alberto Breda; Dorina Gui; Johnathan Said; Peter Schulam
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Third-generation nephrectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Estevao Lima; Carla Rolanda; José M Pêgo; Tiago Henriques-Coelho; David Silva; Luís Osório; Ivone Moreira; José L Carvalho; Jorge Correia-Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Rapid communication: transvaginal single-port NOTES nephrectomy: initial laboratory experience.

Authors:  Ralph V Clayman; Geoffrey N Box; Jose Benito A Abraham; Hak J Lee; Leslie A Deane; Eric R Sargent; Ninh T Nguyen; Kenneth Chang; Amy K Tan; Lee E Ponsky; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments in the porcine model.

Authors:  Justin P Isariyawongse; Michael F McGee; Michael J Rosen; Edward E Cherullo; Lee E Ponsky
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Edward E Cherullo; Anoop M Meraney; Fred Borsuk; David P Murphy; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy with vaginal delivery of the intact kidney.

Authors:  G Breda; P Silvestre; A Giunta; D Xausa; A Tamai; L Gherardi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Luise Andersen; Ole Lerberg Nielsen; Barbara Juliane Holzknecht; Peter Vilmann; Søren Meisner; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survival study in a sheep model.

Authors:  Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Francisco J Pérez; Miguel A Sánchez; Jaime Bachiller; Alvaro Juárez; Alvaro Serrano; María José Ribal; Antonio Alcaraz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Douglas S Berkman; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  [Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: feasability of a transrectal, flexible retroperitoneoscopy in a porcine model].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; A Hackethal; S Tacke; P Collet
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Comparison of acute phase protein and hemodynamic variables in dogs undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic vs. open pneumonectomy.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Liu; Qing-Ming Ren; Zhi-Bo Wang; Xin Li; Sheng Jiang; Jian-Tao Zhang; Hong-Bin Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Urological applications of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  NOTES new frontier: Natural orifice approach to retroperitoneal disease.

Authors:  Pierre Allemann; Silvana Perretta; Mitsuhiro Asakuma; Bernard Dallemagne; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-27

Review 8.  Current evidence for transurethral laser therapy of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mario W Kramer; Thorsten Bach; Mathias Wolters; Florian Imkamp; Andreas J Gross; Markus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Feasibility of the transtracheal approach for the thoracic cavity in a large animal model.

Authors:  Yun-Hen Liu; Yen Chu; Chien-Ying Liu; Hung-Pin Liu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Hui-Ping Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Transgastric pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal cancers: a survival and feasibility study.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Peter Vilmann; Søren Meisner; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.