Literature DB >> 19584688

Validity and feasibility of transient elastography for the transplanted liver in the peritransplantation period.

Yosuke Inoue1, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Sumihito Tamura, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Masataka Taguri, Masatoshi Makuuchi, Norihiro Kokudo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transient elastography has recently been suggested to be capable of detecting dynamic changes in stiffness that accompanies acute liver damage. Its feasibility and usefulness in the perioperative period in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have not been studied.
METHODS: We evaluated 678 liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) obtained in the peritransplantation period from 24 LDLT recipients, 24 corresponding donors (preoperatively only), another five donors with a remnant right liver, and three deceased donor liver transplantation recipients. The LSM was performed once preoperatively, every morning postoperatively until postoperative day 14, and three times a week after that until the patient was discharged from the hospital.
RESULTS: Overall LSM success rate (valid shots/total shots) was 0.929+/-0.119. There was a significant negative relationship between the LSM success rate and thoracic belt thickness (P<0.0021). The interquartile range to median value rate of LSMs remained high (21.1%+/-11.2%) compared with the preoperative values (15.6%+/-8.5%), even 1 month after the transplantation. Among LDLT recipients (n=24), the LSM value was highest in the first postoperative week and declined thereafter. Recipients with complications had significantly higher LSM values than those without complications in the fourth postoperative week (POW4; P=0.0066) and POW5 or later (P=0.0028). All cases of acute cellular rejection had a concomitant sharp rise in liver stiffness and a rapidly depleted portal flow.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high variability of the results, transient elastography may be an efficient method for monitoring changes in dynamic liver stiffness in the early posttransplant period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19584688     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181aacb7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  3 in total

1.  New Approaches to the Diagnosis of Rejection and Prediction of Tolerance in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Timucin Taner; Julia Bruner; Juliet Emamaullee; Eliano Bonaccorsi-Riani; Ali Zarrinpar
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.385

2.  Functional assessment of liver regeneration after major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Fadi Rassam; Pim B Olthof; Bart Takkenberg; Marc G Besselink; Olivier R Busch; Joris I Erdmann; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Krijn P van Lienden; Ulrich H Beuers; Roelof J Bennink; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 8.265

Review 3.  Elastography for hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Yosuke Inoue; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 2.549

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.