PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in several tumor types, and its expression is influenced by the length of a 5'-end microsatellite repeat (CA)n: the longer the repeat, the lower the expression. Dinucleotide repeats accumulate insertion/deletion types of mutations in tumors with microsatellite instability. We designed this study to estimate the occurrence of these mutations in EGFR(CA)n and their relevance in carcinogenesis of microsatellite instability-positive colon and gastric tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed the frequency of EGFR(CA)n mutations in vivo in 55 colorectal and 14 gastric microsatellite instability-positive cancers, and in vitro in single-cell clone cultures of microsatellite instability-positive colon tumor cell line LS174. Single-cell clone cultures with different repeat lengths were analyzed by fluorescent-activated cell sorter for EGFR cell-surface expression. A correlation analysis was done between EGFR(CA)n mutations and mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and p53. RESULTS: Unlike single-cell clone cultures, which exhibited higher rate of deletions compared with insertions, most of EGFR(CA)n mutations in colon and gastric tumors were insertions. Longer EGFR(CA)n correlated with lower EGFR cell-surface expression in single-cell clone cultures. In colon cancers, the elongation of the repeat was associated negatively with mutations in KRAS and BRAF, but not in p53. CONCLUSIONS: The EGFR(CA)n elongation observed in tumors cannot be explained by an intrinsic property of this repeat favoring insertions versus deletions. Instead, a selection for repeat elongation occurs in microsatellite instability-positive tumors, leading to EGFR down-regulation. These findings suggest that in microsatellite instability-positive tumors current therapies targeting EGFR overexpression may have either no effect or an opposite to the expected effect.
PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in several tumor types, and its expression is influenced by the length of a 5'-end microsatellite repeat (CA)n: the longer the repeat, the lower the expression. Dinucleotide repeats accumulate insertion/deletion types of mutations in tumors with microsatellite instability. We designed this study to estimate the occurrence of these mutations in EGFR(CA)n and their relevance in carcinogenesis of microsatellite instability-positive colon and gastric tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed the frequency of EGFR(CA)n mutations in vivo in 55 colorectal and 14 gastric microsatellite instability-positive cancers, and in vitro in single-cell clone cultures of microsatellite instability-positive colon tumor cell line LS174. Single-cell clone cultures with different repeat lengths were analyzed by fluorescent-activated cell sorter for EGFR cell-surface expression. A correlation analysis was done between EGFR(CA)n mutations and mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and p53. RESULTS: Unlike single-cell clone cultures, which exhibited higher rate of deletions compared with insertions, most of EGFR(CA)n mutations in colon and gastric tumors were insertions. Longer EGFR(CA)n correlated with lower EGFR cell-surface expression in single-cell clone cultures. In colon cancers, the elongation of the repeat was associated negatively with mutations in KRAS and BRAF, but not in p53. CONCLUSIONS: The EGFR(CA)n elongation observed in tumors cannot be explained by an intrinsic property of this repeat favoring insertions versus deletions. Instead, a selection for repeat elongation occurs in microsatellite instability-positive tumors, leading to EGFR down-regulation. These findings suggest that in microsatellite instability-positive tumors current therapies targeting EGFR overexpression may have either no effect or an opposite to the expected effect.
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Philip E Dubé; Fang Yan; Shivesh Punit; Nandini Girish; Steven J McElroy; M Kay Washington; D Brent Polk Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: David N Cooper; Albino Bacolla; Claude Férec; Karen M Vasquez; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; Jian-Min Chen Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Melanie M Ivancic; Edward L Huttlin; Xiaodi Chen; Jennifer K Pleiman; Amy A Irving; Adrian D Hegeman; William F Dove; Michael R Sussman Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Ma Deqin; Zhao Chen; Christopher Nero; Keyur P Patel; Emad M Daoud; Hanyin Cheng; Bojana Djordjevic; Russell R Broaddus; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Asif Rashid; Rajyalakshmi Luthra Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: R L Rego; N R Foster; T C Smyrk; M Le; M J O'Connell; D J Sargent; H Windschitl; F A Sinicrope Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur; David Sefrioui; David Tougeron; Aude Lamy; France Blanchard; Florence Le Pessot; Frédéric Di Fiore; Pierre Michel; Stéphane Bézieau; Jean-Baptiste Latouche; Thierry Frebourg; Richard Sesboüé Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 4.430