Literature DB >> 19584168

The influence of prostate volume on prostate-specific antigen performance: implications for the prostate cancer prevention trial outcomes.

Christopher S Elliott1, Rajesh Shinghal, Joseph C Presti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although showing a 25% reduction in the biopsy prevalence of cancer compared with placebo in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, finasteride was associated with a higher prevalence of high-grade disease. This observation was driven by "for-cause" biopsies. We sought to understand how volume-dependent changes in prostate-specific antigen test performance characteristics may have contributed. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A retrospective review was done on 1,304 men referred for initial biopsy with a prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/mL or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Receiver-operator curves and positive predictive values were ascertained for prostate-specific antigen stratified by diagnosis and prostate volume.
RESULTS: The performance of prostate-specific antigen changed for any and high-grade (Gleason, > or =3 + 4) cancer in a volume-specific manner. For any cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) decreased from 0.758 to 0.629 to 0.520 as prostate volume increased (<30, 30-50, >50 cm(3), respectively). For high-grade cancer, a similar trend was shown (AUC, 0.712, 0.639, and 0.497, respectively). The positive predictive value of a prostate-specific antigen of > or =4 ng/mL was also affected by prostate volume. Trends for Gleason < or = 6 decreased as prostate volume increased (positive predictive value for <30 cm(3), 25.0%; positive predictive value for 30-50 cm(3), 23.8%; and positive predictive value for >50 cm(3), 17.3%). A more significant trend was seen for high-grade cancer (positive predictive value for <30 cm(3), 39.0%; positive predictive value for 30-50 cm(3), 22.3%; and positive predictive value for >50 cm(3), 10.7%).
CONCLUSION: Decreases in prostate volume over time and the resultant change in prostate-specific antigen performance characteristics may have contributed a bias toward the detection of high-grade disease in the finasteride arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19584168     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  5 in total

1.  Impact of common medications on serum total prostate-specific antigen levels: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Steven L Chang; Lauren C Harshman; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  MRI determined prostate volume and the incidence of prostate cancer on MRI-fusion biopsy: a systemic review of reported data for the last 20 years.

Authors:  Andrew S Knight; Pranav Sharma; Werner T W de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Prostate size and adverse pathologic features in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Bing Ying Poon; Daniel D Sjoberg; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Preventive and therapeutic efficacy of finasteride and dutasteride in TRAMP mice.

Authors:  Alexander B Opoku-Acheampong; Dave Unis; Jamie N Henningson; Amanda P Beck; Brian L Lindshield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Any Correlation Between Prostate Volume and Incidence of Prostate Cancer: A Review of Reported Data for the Last Thirty Years.

Authors:  Justine R Yamashiro; Werner T W de Riese
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-10-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.