PURPOSE: To evaluate noninvasive imaging methods as predictive biomarkers of response to trastuzumab in mouse models of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. The correlation between tumor regression and molecular imaging of apoptosis, glucose metabolism, and cellular proliferation was evaluated longitudinally in responding and nonresponding tumor-bearing cohorts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Mammary tumors from MMTV/HER2 transgenic female mice were transplanted into syngeneic female mice. BT474 human breast carcinoma cell line xenografts were grown in athymic nude mice. Tumor cell apoptosis (NIR700-Annexin V accumulation), glucose metabolism [2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET)], and proliferation [3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine-PET ([18F]FLT-PET)] were evaluated throughout a biweekly trastuzumab regimen. Imaging metrics were validated by direct measurement of tumor size and immunohistochemical analysis of cleaved caspase-3, phosphorylated AKT, and Ki67. RESULTS: NIR700-Annexin V accumulated significantly in trastuzumab-treated MMTV/HER2 and BT474 tumors that ultimately regressed but not in nonresponding or vehicle-treated tumors. Uptake of [18F]FDG was not affected by trastuzumab treatment in MMTV/HER2 or BT474 tumors. [18F]FLT-PET imaging predicted trastuzumab response in BT474 tumors but not in MMTV/HER2 tumors, which exhibited modest uptake of [18F]FLT. Close agreement was observed between imaging metrics and immunohistochemical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular imaging of apoptosis accurately predicts trastuzumab-induced regression of HER2+ tumors and may warrant clinical exploration to predict early response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab. Trastuzumab does not seem to alter glucose metabolism substantially enough to afford [18F]FDG-PET significant predictive value in this setting. Although promising in one preclinical model, further studies are required to determine the overall value of [18F]FLT-PET as a biomarker of response to trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer.
PURPOSE: To evaluate noninvasive imaging methods as predictive biomarkers of response to trastuzumab in mouse models of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. The correlation between tumor regression and molecular imaging of apoptosis, glucose metabolism, and cellular proliferation was evaluated longitudinally in responding and nonresponding tumor-bearing cohorts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Mammary tumors from MMTV/HER2transgenic female mice were transplanted into syngeneic female mice. BT474humanbreast carcinoma cell line xenografts were grown in athymic nude mice. Tumor cell apoptosis (NIR700-Annexin V accumulation), glucose metabolism [2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET)], and proliferation [3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine-PET ([18F]FLT-PET)] were evaluated throughout a biweekly trastuzumab regimen. Imaging metrics were validated by direct measurement of tumor size and immunohistochemical analysis of cleaved caspase-3, phosphorylated AKT, and Ki67. RESULTS:NIR700-Annexin V accumulated significantly in trastuzumab-treated MMTV/HER2 and BT474tumors that ultimately regressed but not in nonresponding or vehicle-treated tumors. Uptake of [18F]FDG was not affected by trastuzumab treatment in MMTV/HER2 or BT474tumors. [18F]FLT-PET imaging predicted trastuzumab response in BT474tumors but not in MMTV/HER2 tumors, which exhibited modest uptake of [18F]FLT. Close agreement was observed between imaging metrics and immunohistochemical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular imaging of apoptosis accurately predicts trastuzumab-induced regression of HER2+ tumors and may warrant clinical exploration to predict early response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab. Trastuzumab does not seem to alter glucose metabolism substantially enough to afford [18F]FDG-PET significant predictive value in this setting. Although promising in one preclinical model, further studies are required to determine the overall value of [18F]FLT-PET as a biomarker of response to trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer.
Authors: Syed K Mohsin; Heidi L Weiss; M Carolina Gutierrez; Gary C Chamness; Rachel Schiff; Michael P Digiovanna; Chun-Xia Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck; C Kent Osborne; D Craig Allred; Richard Elledge; Jenny C Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Garry M McDermott; Andrew Welch; Roger T Staff; Fiona J Gilbert; Lutz Schweiger; Scott I K Semple; Tim A D Smith; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-08-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Barbara J Fueger; Johannes Czernin; Isabel Hildebrandt; Chris Tran; Benjamin S Halpern; David Stout; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marta Guix; Nara de Matos Granja; Ingrid Meszoely; Theresa B Adkins; Bobbye M Wieman; Kerek E Frierson; Violeta Sanchez; Melinda E Sanders; Ana M Grau; Ingrid A Mayer; Gary Pestano; Yu Shyr; Senthil Muthuswamy; Benjamin Calvo; Helen Krontiras; Ian E Krop; Mark C Kelley; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephanie L Barnes; Jennifer G Whisenant; Mary E Loveless; Gregory D Ayers; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Matthew R Hight; Yiu-Yin Cheung; Michael L Nickels; Eric S Dawson; Ping Zhao; Samir Saleh; Jason R Buck; Dewei Tang; M Kay Washington; Robert J Coffey; H Charles Manning Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Todd W Miller; James T Forbes; Chirayu Shah; Shelby K Wyatt; H Charles Manning; Maria G Olivares; Violeta Sanchez; Teresa C Dugger; Nara de Matos Granja; Archana Narasanna; Rebecca S Cook; J Phillip Kennedy; Craig W Lindsley; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 12.531