Literature DB >> 19583539

Canadian academic experience with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Michelle O'Neill1, Paul E Beaule, Ahmad Bin Nasser, Donald Garbuz, Martin Lavigne, Clive Duncan, Paul R Kim, Emil Schemitsch.   

Abstract

The current depth and breadth of experience in hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers is not well known. This study endeavors to increase awareness of the prevalence of programs and current experience in a select number of representative teaching centers by examining the learning curve of high-volume surgeons. A questionnaire was sent to all academic centers in Canada to identify the volume of hip resurfacing, surgical approach, and type of prosthesis. In addition, five surgeons, not fellowship-trained in hip resurfacing, were selected for a detailed review of their first 50 cases, including survey of patient demographics, surgical approach, radiographic evaluation, complications, and revision. Eleven of 14 academic centers are currently performing hip resurfacing. All of these centers had performed more than 50 cases, with 10 of 11 of them having more than one surgeon performing the procedure. The posterior approach was found to be the most commonly utilized in surgeries. The overall revision rate was 3.2% at a mean time of 2 years, with femoral neck fracture (1.6%) being the most common cause for failure. The failure rate was comparable to other centers of expertise and lower than previously published multicenter trials. All surgeons reviewed were in specialized arthroplasty practices, which may contribute to the relatively low complication rates reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19583539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis        ISSN: 1936-9719


  9 in total

1.  Profunda femoris pseudoaneurysm following Birmingham hip resurfacing: an important differential diagnosis for a periarticular cystic mass.

Authors:  M S Thomas; J N O'Hara; A M Davies; Steven L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Surgical management of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Socket position determines hip resurfacing 10-year survivorship.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard N de Steiger; Lisa N Miller; Gareth H Prosser; Stephen E Graves; David C Davidson; Tyman E Stanford
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Are component positioning and prosthesis size associated with hip resurfacing failure?

Authors:  David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Aaron J Johnson; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Incidence of groin pain after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Ahmad Bin Nasser; Paul E Beaulé; Michelle O'Neill; Paul R Kim; Anna Fazekas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So.

Authors:  Henri Migaud; Sophie Putman; Antoine Combes; Charles Berton; Donatien Bocquet; Laurent Vasseur; Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-11

8.  Groin pain after metal on metal hip resurfacing: mid-term follow-up of a prospective cohort of patients.

Authors:  Emmanuel Illical; Heather Belanger; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-26

9.  ELIGIBILITY FOR THE HIP-RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE: AN EVALUATION ON 592 HIPS.

Authors:  Roberto Dantas Queiroz; Rafael Salomon Silva Faria; David Marcelo Duarte; Marcelo Itiro Takano; Mauricio Morita Sugiyama
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.