Literature DB >> 19582182

Preoperative evaluation, surgical procedure, follow up and results of 150 cochlear implantations.

G Kyriafinis1, V Vital, A Psifidis, J Constantinidis, A Nikolaou, M Hitoglou-Antoniadou, A Kouloulas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cochlear implantation is among the most important achievements of medicine and biotechnology in the last 20 years, because it allows individuals who had never heard or had lost their hearing to perceive sound and improve their quality of life. Selection criteria for candidates are strict and are evaluated in each individual by a scientific committee specially trained for implantations which includes Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeon, audiologist, psychiatrist and speech therapist. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our department, the first cochlear implantation was performed in 1995. During the last ten years more than 250 individuals have been evaluated due to profound hearing loss and 170 of them were found to be suitable candidates for cochlear implantation. One hundred and fifty (150) have already been operated and most of them are children with congenital hearing loss. No major or permanent complications were recorded in any of our 150 patients. Activation and fitting/mapping of the cochlear implant is initiated three weeks post-operatively. Regular follow-up and mapping of the implant are held, more frequently in children, along with specialized speech therapy. Each new mapping is evaluated according to the record of the patient with regard to the acoustic perception of sounds and speech and the discrimination of individual elements of phonation based on a protocol that we have created for the needs of Greek language.
RESULTS: Speech discrimination (AHEPA Hospital protocol), before the Implantation, at the activation of the cochlear implant and till 4 years of the follow-up showed that in our patients, we obtained better and faster results in post-speech acquisition adults with recent or chronic deafness and in children with congenital deafness operated before the 5th year of age, who underwent special preoperative speech therapy programme, fact which is in agreement with current literature. Patient satisfaction evaluated by "Sanders" psychometrics tests, was achieved in accordance to pre-operative expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: In our patients, we observed better and faster results in children with congenital deafness operated before the third year of age, in post-speech acquisition adults with recent deafness and in post-speech acquisition adults with chronic deafness but with auditory memory reserve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; cochlear implantation; follow up of cochlear implantation; results of cochlear implantation; surgical procedure of cochlear implantation

Year:  2007        PMID: 19582182      PMCID: PMC2464273     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippokratia        ISSN: 1108-4189            Impact factor:   0.471


  15 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation in children under the age of two: the MHH experience with the CLARION cochlear implant. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

Authors:  T Lenarz; A Lesinski-Schiedat; S von der Haar-Heise; A Illg; B Bertram; R D Battmer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1999-04

2.  Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rose A Burkholder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-05

3.  [Auditory prosthesis by means of a distant electrical stimulation of the sensory nerve with the use of an indwelt coiling].

Authors:  A DJOURNO; C EYRIES
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1957-08-31       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  A multiple-electrode array for a cochlear implant.

Authors:  G M Clark; R J Hallworth
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; K I Kirk; A M Robbins; S Todd; A Riley; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997

6.  Cochlear implants.

Authors:  W F House
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  T P Nikolopoulos; G M O'Donoghue; S Archbold
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults.

Authors:  R D Battmer; S P Gupta; D J Allum-Mecklenburg; T Lenarz
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

9.  Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential.

Authors:  B J Gantz; C J Brown; P J Abbas
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-03

10.  Short-term auditory memory in children using cochlear implants and its relevance to receptive language.

Authors:  P W Dawson; P A Busby; C M McKay; G M Clark
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  Functional Pattern of Increasing Concentrations of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Research on Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Emina Ramku; Refik Ramku; Dugagjin Spanca; Valbona Zhjeqi
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 2.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.