Literature DB >> 19581804

Regional techniques and outcome: what is the evidence?

Marie N Hanna1, Jamie D Murphy, Kanupriya Kumar, Christopher L Wu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite some controversy regarding the strength of the available data, the use of regional anesthesia and analgesia does provide improvement in patient outcomes. Although the majority of available data have examined the effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on patient outcomes, an increasing number of studies recently have investigated the effect of peripheral regional techniques on patient outcomes. RECENT
FINDINGS: Data generally indicate that the perioperative use of regional anesthesia and analgesia may be associated with improvement in both major (e.g. mortality, major morbidity) outcomes and rehabilitation. The majority of evidence favors an ability of epidural analgesia to reduce postoperative cardiovascular and pulmonary complications and there is also consistent evidence that epidural analgesia with local anesthetics is associated with faster resolution of postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. Overall, regional analgesic techniques provide statistically superior analgesia compared with systemic opioids.
SUMMARY: Perioperative use of regional analgesic techniques may provide improvement in conventional outcomes, although the benefit appears to be limited to high-risk patients and those undergoing high-risk procedures. The benefits conferred by perioperative regional anesthetic techniques need to be weighed against any potential risks and this should be assessed on an individual basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19581804     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832f330a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Complications of peripheral regional anesthesia].

Authors:  M Neuburger; J Büttner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Recommendations for the implementation of a Patient Blood Management programme. Application to elective major orthopaedic surgery in adults.

Authors:  Stefania Vaglio; Domenico Prisco; Gianni Biancofiore; Daniela Rafanelli; Paola Antonioli; Michele Lisanti; Lorenzo Andreani; Leonardo Basso; Claudio Velati; Giuliano Grazzini; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  Intravenous versus Epidural Routes of Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dmitriy Viderman; Karina Tapinova; Fatima Nabidollayeva; Ramil Tankacheev; Yerkin G Abdildin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults.

Authors:  Jon H Salicath; Emily Cy Yeoh; Michael H Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-30

5.  Postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  C Chelazzi; G Villa; A R De Gaudio
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-22

6.  Regional Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery: Can It Be a Standard in the Future?

Authors:  Jae-Koo Lee; Jong Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun; Daniel Hodel; Oliver N Hausmann
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

7.  Perioperative effects of caudal block on pediatric patients in laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bingdong Tao; Kun Liu; Dandan Wang; Mengmeng Ding; Ni Yang; Ping Zhao
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.125

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.