Literature DB >> 19581803

Implementation of a mandatory checklist of protocols and objectives improves compliance with a wide range of evidence-based intensive care unit practices.

Matthew C Byrnes1, Douglas J E Schuerer, Marilyn E Schallom, Carrie S Sona, John E Mazuski, Beth E Taylor, Wendi McKenzie, James M Thomas, Jeffrey S Emerson, Jennifer L Nemeth, Ruth A Bailey, Walter A Boyle, Timothy G Buchman, Craig M Coopersmith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine a) if a checklist covering a diverse group of intensive care unit protocols and objectives would improve clinician consideration of these domains and b) if improved consideration would change practice patterns.
DESIGN: Pre- and post observational study.
SETTING: A 24-bed surgical/burn/trauma intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 1399 patients admitted between June 2006 and May 2007.
INTERVENTIONS: The first component of the study evaluated whether mandating verbal review of a checklist covering 14 intensive care unit best practices altered verbal consideration of these domains. Evaluation was performed using real-time bedside audits on morning rounds. The second component evaluated whether the checklist altered implementation of these domains by changing practice patterns. Evaluation was performed by analyzing data from the Project IMPACT database after patients left the intensive care unit.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Verbal consideration of evaluable domains improved from 90.9% (530/583) to 99.7% (669/671, p < .0001) after verbal review of the checklist was mandated. Bedside consideration improved on the use of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (p < .05), stress ulcer prophylaxis (p < .01), oral care for ventilated patients (p < 0.01), electrolyte repletion (p < .01), initiation of physical therapy (p < .05), and documentation of restraint orders (p < .0001). Mandatory verbal review of the checklist resulted in a greater than two-fold increase in transferring patients out of the intensive care unit on telemetry (16% vs. 35%, p < .0001) and initiation of physical therapy (28% vs. 42%, p < .0001) compared with baseline practice.
CONCLUSIONS: A mandatory verbal review of a checklist covering a wide range of objectives and goals at each patient's bedside is an effective method to improve both consideration and implementation of intensive care unit best practices. A bedside checklist is a simple, cost-effective method to prevent errors of omission in basic domains of intensive care unit management that might otherwise be forgotten in the setting of more urgent care requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19581803     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a96379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  29 in total

Review 1.  Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist for antibiotics: do we need a co-pilot in the ICU?

Authors:  Curtis H Weiss; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.687

2.  Checklist & prompting in intensive care unit: quality of care is improved but long way to go for better outcome.

Authors:  Souvik Maitra
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist and process of care and clinical outcomes: a single-site study.

Authors:  Curtis H Weiss; Farzad Moazed; Colleen A McEvoy; Benjamin D Singer; Igal Szleifer; Luís A N Amaral; Mary Kwasny; Charles M Watts; Stephen D Persell; David W Baker; Jacob I Sznajder; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Prevention of Nosocomial Infection in the Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit: Remember the Basics.

Authors:  Rob Boots
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Feasibility and utility of the use of real time random safety audits in adult ICU patients: a multicentre study.

Authors:  M Bodí; M Olona; M C Martín; R Alceaga; J C Rodríguez; E Corral; J M Pérez Villares; G Sirgo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Integrating palliative care in the surgical and trauma intensive care unit: a report from the Improving Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit (IPAL-ICU) Project Advisory Board and the Center to Advance Palliative Care.

Authors:  Anne C Mosenthal; David E Weissman; J Randall Curtis; Ross M Hays; Dana R Lustbader; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen A Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Karen J Brasel; Margaret Campbell; Judith E Nelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Safety climate reduces medication and dislodgement errors in routine intensive care practice.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Michael Schiffinger; Johannes Steyrer; Clemens Huber; Guido Strunk
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Top stories of 2009.

Authors:  S K Todi
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01

9.  Peer reviewing critical care: a pragmatic approach to quality management.

Authors:  Jan-Peter Braun; Hanswerner Bause; Frank Bloos; Götz Geldner; Marc Kastrup; Ralf Kuhlen; Andreas Markewitz; Jörg Martin; Hendrik Mende; Michael Quintel; Klaus Steinmeier-Bauer; Christian Waydhas; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-08

10.  A clinical trial comparing physician prompting with an unprompted automated electronic checklist to reduce empirical antibiotic utilization.

Authors:  Curtis H Weiss; David Dibardino; Jason Rho; Nina Sung; Brett Collander; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.