OBJECTIVE: To examine the joint effects of movie smoking exposure and team sports participation on established smoking. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: School- and telephone-based surveys in New Hampshire and Vermont between September 1999 through November 1999 and February 2006 through February 2007. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2048 youths aged 16 to 21 years at follow-up. Main Exposures Baseline movie smoking exposure categorized in quartiles assessed when respondents were aged 9 to 14 years and team sports participation assessed when respondents were aged 16 to 21 years. Main Outcome Measure Established smoking (having smoked > or =100 cigarettes in one's lifetime) at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, 353 respondents (17.2%) were established smokers. Exposure to the highest quartile of movie smoking compared with the lowest increased the likelihood of established smoking (odds ratio = 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.57), and team sports nonparticipants compared with participants were twice as likely to be established smokers (odds ratio = 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-2.74). The joint effects of movie smoking exposure and team sports participation revealed that at each quartile of movie smoking exposure, the odds of established smoking were greater for team sports nonparticipants than for participants. We saw a dose-response relationship of movie smoking exposure for established smoking only among team sports participants. CONCLUSIONS: Team sports participation clearly plays a protective role against established smoking, even in the face of exposure to movie smoking. However, movie smoking exposure increases the risk of established smoking among both team sports participants and nonparticipants. Parents, teachers, coaches, and clinicians should be aware that encouraging team sports participation in tandem with minimizing early exposure to movie smoking may offer the greatest likelihood of preventing youth smoking.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the joint effects of movie smoking exposure and team sports participation on established smoking. DESIGN:Longitudinal study. SETTING: School- and telephone-based surveys in New Hampshire and Vermont between September 1999 through November 1999 and February 2006 through February 2007. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2048 youths aged 16 to 21 years at follow-up. Main Exposures Baseline movie smoking exposure categorized in quartiles assessed when respondents were aged 9 to 14 years and team sports participation assessed when respondents were aged 16 to 21 years. Main Outcome Measure Established smoking (having smoked > or =100 cigarettes in one's lifetime) at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, 353 respondents (17.2%) were established smokers. Exposure to the highest quartile of movie smoking compared with the lowest increased the likelihood of established smoking (odds ratio = 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.57), and team sports nonparticipants compared with participants were twice as likely to be established smokers (odds ratio = 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-2.74). The joint effects of movie smoking exposure and team sports participation revealed that at each quartile of movie smoking exposure, the odds of established smoking were greater for team sports nonparticipants than for participants. We saw a dose-response relationship of movie smoking exposure for established smoking only among team sports participants. CONCLUSIONS: Team sports participation clearly plays a protective role against established smoking, even in the face of exposure to movie smoking. However, movie smoking exposure increases the risk of established smoking among both team sports participants and nonparticipants. Parents, teachers, coaches, and clinicians should be aware that encouraging team sports participation in tandem with minimizing early exposure to movie smoking may offer the greatest likelihood of preventing youth smoking.
Authors: James D Sargent; Madeline A Dalton; Michael L Beach; Leila A Mott; Jennifer J Tickle; M Bridget Ahrens; Todd F Heatherton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Madeline A Dalton; James D Sargent; Michael L Beach; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Jennifer J Gibson; M Bridget Ahrens; Jennifer J Tickle; Todd F Heatherton Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Madeline A Dalton; M Bridget Ahrens; James D Sargent; Leila A Mott; Michael L Beach; Jennifer J Tickle; Todd F Heatherton Journal: Eff Clin Pract Date: 2002 Jan-Feb
Authors: Patrick Peretti-Watel; Valérie Guagliardo; Pierre Verger; Jacques Pruvost; Patrick Mignon; Yolande Obadia Journal: Addiction Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Brian A Primack; Meghan R Longacre; Michael L Beach; Anna M Adachi-Mejia; Linda J Titus; Madeline A Dalton Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Anna M Adachi-Mejia; Lisa A Sutherland; Meghan R Longacre; Michael L Beach; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Jennifer J Gibson; Madeline A Dalton Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Reiner Hanewinkel; James D Sargent; Sólveig Karlsdóttir; Stefán Hrafn Jónsson; Federica Mathis; Fabrizio Faggiano; Evelien A P Poelen; Ron Scholte; Ewa Florek; Helen Sweeting; Kate Hunt; Matthis Morgenstern Journal: Tob Control Date: 2011-12-18 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Frédéric Chagué; Emmanuel Reboursière; Jean Israël; Jean-Philippe Hager; Patrice Ngassa; Marc Geneste; Jean-Pierre Guinoiseau; Gilles Garet; Jacques Girardin; Jacques Sarda; Yves Cottin; Marianne Zeller Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anna M Adachi-Mejia; Heather A Carlos; Ethan M Berke; Susanne E Tanski; James D Sargent Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-09-01 Impact factor: 2.692